International Comparisons of Child Well-Being

Reference work entry

Abstract

Over recent years the number of international comparisons of child well-being has grown. These comparisons have taken advantage of new data available in expanding international surveys of children to assess what countries are achieving for their children, and whether lessons for child and family policies can be drawn across nations. This chapter reflect on the purposes and challenges of international comparisons of child well-being, how these comparisons are constructed, the results, and how robust these results are. It goes on to introduce follow-up work to comparison of well-being outcomes, such as comparisons of child public expenditure and policy comparisons, which have been developed to explain why countries of similar levels of economic development produce such a broad range of children’s outcomes. The chapter concludes with a short reflection on key steps to improve international comparisons of child well-being, before finally addressing a key question of “what has comparative research taught us so far about how to improve children’s well-being?.”

Keywords

Child Poverty Family Policy Income Poverty Qualitative Comparative Analysis OECD Member Country 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. African Child Policy Forum. (2010). The African report on child wellbeing: Budgeting for children. Addis Ababa: The African Child Policy Forum.Google Scholar
  2. Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110(2), 305–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradshaw, J., & Richardson, D. (2009). An index of child well-being in Europe. Child Indicators Research, 2(3), 319–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P., & Richardson, D. (2006). Comparing child well-being in OECD countries: Concepts and methods (Innocenti Working Paper No. 2006–03). Florence: UNICEF Innocenti Research Centre.Google Scholar
  5. Bradshaw, J., Hoelscher, P., & Richardson, D. (2007). An index of child well-being in the European Union. Social Indicators Research, 80(1), 133–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. J. (2007). The technology of skill formation. AEA Papers and Proceedings, 97(2), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dijkstra, T. (2009). Child well-being in rich countries: UNICEF’s ranking revisited, and new symmetric aggregating operators exemplified. Child Indicators Research, 2(3), 303–317.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission, Social Protection Committee. (2008). Child poverty and well-being in the EU: Current status and way forward. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://www.libertysecurity.org/IMG/pdf_ke3008251_en.pdf. Accessed October 2012.
  9. Hagerty, M., & Land, K. (2006). Constructing summary indices of quality of life: A model for the effect of heterogeneous importance weights, see http://www.economics.ucr.edu/workshop/papers/MichaelHagerty.pdf. Accessed October 2012.
  10. Hobbs, F., & Lippmann, L. (1990). Children’s well-being: An international comparison (International Population Reports Series P-95, No.80). Washington, DC: U.S Dept. of Commerce, Bureau of Census.Google Scholar
  11. Lau, M., & Bradshaw, J. (2010). Child well-being in the Pacific Rim. Child Indicators Research, 3(3), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. OECD. (2009). Doing better for children. Paris: OECD Publishing. www.oecd.org/els/social/childwellbeing. Accessed October 2012.
  13. OECD. (2011). Doing better for families. Paris: OECD Publishing. www.oecd.org/els/social/family/doingbetter. Accessed October 2012.
  14. OECD. (2012). OECD Family Database. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  15. Richardson, D. (2009). Regional case studies – Child well-being in Europe. In S. B. Kamerman et al. (Eds.), From child welfare to child well-being: Indicators and research (Vol. 1). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Richardson, D. (2012). An evaluation of international surveys of children, Forthcoming report (OECD SEM Working paper series).Google Scholar
  17. Richardson, D., Hoelscher, P., & Bradshaw, J. (2008). Child well-being in Central and Eastern European Countries (CEE) and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS). Child Indicators Research, 1, 211–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Save the Children (2008) The Child Development Index: Holding Governments to account for children’s wellbeing, Save The Children, London. http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/docs/Child_Development_Index%281%29_1.pdf. Accessed October 2012.
  19. Save The Children (2012) The Child Development Index 2012, Progress, Challenges and Inequality, Save The Children, London. http://www.savethechildren.org.uk/sites/default/files/docs/Child_Development_Index_2012_UK_low_res.pdf. Accessed October 2012.
  20. Stiglitz, J. E., Sen, A., & Fitoussi J. (2010). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress. www.stiglitz-sen-fitoussi.fr/documents/rapport_anglais.pdf. Accessed November 2010.
  21. Tarki/Applica. (2010). Child poverty and child well-being in the European Union: Report for the European Commission. Budapest: Tarki Social Research Institute.Google Scholar
  22. UNICEF. (2007). Child poverty in perspective: An overview of child well-being in rich countries (Innocenti report card 7). Florence: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  23. UNICEF. (2010). The children left behind: A league table of inequality in child well-being in the world's richest countries (Innocenti report card 9). Florence: UNICEF.Google Scholar
  24. United Nations. (1989/1990). United Nations convention for the rights of children. www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/k2crc.htm. Accessed October 2012.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Policy Division, Department of Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (DELSA)Organization for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentParisFrance

Personalised recommendations