Navigating Access to Addictions Literature: The Hubert H. Humphrey Fellowship Experience

  • Nita Bryant
Reference work entry


Treatment providers lacking access to university libraries and/or costly journals have greater access than ever before to the scientific literature in the field and to the companion gray literature that distills the science into practical information. Educational sources essential for understanding and engaging in evidence-based practice (EBP) are also increasingly available online free of charge. While this is clearly cause for celebration, awareness of these resources is low, and navigating this highly complex and disjointed literature terrain can be daunting without professional guidance. The intent of this chapter is to raise awareness of these complementary sources, demonstrate their scope and utility, and encourage their use.


Harm Reduction Gray Literature Open Access Journal Motivational Incentive Needle Exchange Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alberani VP, De Castro P, Mazza AM (1990) The use of grey literature in health sciences: a preliminary survey. Bull Med Libr Assoc 78(4):358–363PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ali H, Calabria B, Phillips B, Singleton J, Sigmundsdottir L, Roberts A, Congreve E, McLaren J, Mathers B, Degenhardt L (2010) Searching the grey literature to access information on drugs, alcohol and HIV/AIDS research: an update. J Am Med Inf Assoc 14(2):212–220Google Scholar
  3. Andrews J, Pearce KA, Ireson C, Love MM (2005) Information-seeking behaviors of practitioners in a primary care practice-based research network. J Am Med Inf Assoc 93(2):206–212Google Scholar
  4. Arunachalam S (2003) Information for research in developing countries – information technology, a friend or foe? Int Inf Libr Rev 35(2–4):133–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brower SM (2010) Medical education and information literacy in the era of open access. Med Ref Serv Q 29(1):85–91PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown BS (1995) Reducing impediments to technology transfer in drug abuse programming. NIDA Res Monogr 155:169–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Carr S, Iredell H, Newton-Smith C, Clark C (2011) Evaluation of information literacy skill development in first year medical students. Aust Acad Res Libr 42(2):136–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chan L, Subbiah A, Kirsop B (2009) The chain of communication in health science: from researcher to health worker through open access. Open Med 3(3):111–119Google Scholar
  9. Clark HW (2002) Bridging the gap between substance abuse practice and research: the national treatment plan initiative. J Drug Issues 32(3):757–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Condon TP, Miner LL, Balmer CW, Pintello D (2008) Blending addiction research and practice: strategies for technology transfer. J Subst Abus Treat 35(2):156–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coomber R, Millward L, Chambers J (2003) A rapid interim review of the ‘grey’ literature on drug prevention in young people aged 11–18 with a special emphasis on vulnerable groups. Health Development Agency, London, Accessed 1 May 2012
  12. Cullen R, Clark M, Esson R (2011) Evidence-based information-seeking skills of junior doctors entering the workforce: an evaluation of the impact of information literacy training during pre-clinical years. Health Inf Libr J 28(2):119–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. DiCenso A, Bayley L, Haynes RB (2009) Accessing pre-appraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model. Evid Based Nurs 12(4):99–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ilic D (2009) Assessing competency in evidence based practice: strengths and limitations of current tools in practice. BMC Med Educ 9:53PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Judd T, Kennedy G (2011) Expediency-based practice? Medical students’ reliance on Google and Wikipedia for biomedical inquiries. Br J Educ Technol 42(2):351–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. LaPelle NR, Luckmann R, Hatheway Simpson E, Martin ER (2006) Identifying strategies to improve access to credible and relevant information for public health professionals: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health 6:89PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lasserre KE, Foxlee N, Kruesi L, Walters J (2011) Health sciences librarians’ research on medical students’ use of information for their studies at the medical school, University of Queensland, Australia. Med Ref Serv Q 30(2):141–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Leckie G, Pettigrew KE, Sylvain C (1996) Modeling the information seeking of professionals: a general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Libr Q 66(2):161–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Leffler JM, Jackson Y, West AE, McCarty CA, Atkins MS (2013) Training in evidence-based practice across the professional continuum. Prof Psychol Res Pract 44(1):20–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin Y, Vaska M (2009) Information literacy and librarians’ experiences with teaching grey literature to medical students and healthcare practitioners. Grey J 5(3):134–141Google Scholar
  21. Marinelli-Casey P, Domier CP, Rawson RA (2002) The gap between research and practice in substance abuse treatment. Psychiatr Serv 53(8):984–987PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McGrath Y, Sumnall H, Edmonds K, McVeigh J, Bellis M (2006) Review of grey literature on drug prevention among young people. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, London, Accessed 28 June 2012
  23. Meats E, Brassey J, Heneghan C, Glasziou P (2007) Using the turning research into practice (TRIP) database: how do clinicians really search? J Med Libr Assoc 95(2):156–163PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mokhtar IA, Majid S, Foo S, Zhang X, Theng Y, Chang Y et al (2012) Evidence-based practice and related information literacy skills of nurses in Singapore: an exploratory case study. Health Inform J 18(1):12–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosa C, Ghitza U, Tai B (2012) Selection and utilization of assessment instruments in substance abuse treatment trials: the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network experience. Subst Abuse Rehabil 3(1):81–89PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schardt C, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P, Adams MB, Owens T, Keitz S, Fontelo P (2007) Utilization of the PICO framework to improve searching PubMed for clinical questions. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 7(16)Google Scholar
  27. Thomson H (2013) Improving utility of evidence synthesis for healthy public policy: the three rs (relevance, rigor, and readability [and resources]). Am J Public Health 103(8):e17–e23PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Academic OutreachJames Branch Cabell Library, Virginia Commonwealth UniversityRichmondUSA

Personalised recommendations