Treatment Systems for Population Management of Substance Use Disorders: Requirements and Priorities from a Public Health Perspective

Reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter describes the requirements and priorities of service systems designed to treat persons with substance use disorders. Research and theory are reviewed to inform policymakers, program administrators, and treatment providers about the best ways to organize or to expand treatment services using a public health systems perspective, which is concerned primarily with how services contribute to the health and welfare of a population. The requirements of a service system include sound policies (especially stable financing); appropriate structural features, such as facilities and trained personnel; and services that are accessible, affordable, and integrated. The priorities for establishing such a system will depend on the assessment of population needs, as well as needs-based planning and the support of mutual help organizations. It is concluded that a public health approach to the development of treatment systems provides a useful way of responding to the changing needs of the population in relation to substance use disorders.

References

  1. Aasland OG, Johannesen A (2008) Screening and brief intervention for alcohol problems in Norway. Not a big hit among general practitioners. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs 25:515–522Google Scholar
  2. Babor TF, Del Boca FK (eds) (2003) Treatment matching in alcoholism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Babor TF, Poznyak V (2010) The World Health Organization substance abuse instrument for mapping services. Rationale, structure and functions. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs 27:703–711Google Scholar
  4. Babor T, Caulkins J, Edwards G, Fischer B, Foxcroft D, Humphreys K, Obot I, Rehm J, Reuter P, Room R, Rossow I, Strang J (2010) Drug policy and the public good. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Babor TF, McRee B, Kassebaum P, Grimaldi P, Ahmed K, Bray J (2007) Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): toward a public health approach to the management of substance abuse. Subst Abus 28:7–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babor TF, Stenius K, Romelsjo A (2008) Alcohol and drug treatment systems in public health perspective: mediators and moderators of population effects. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 17(S1):S50–S59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barfod S (2008) A GP’s reflections on brief intervention in primary health care in Denmark. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs 25:523–528Google Scholar
  8. Bray J, Hayashi S, Babor T, Clark W (in press) Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): rationale, program overview and cross-site evaluation. AddictionGoogle Scholar
  9. Bukten A, Skurtveit S, Gossop M et al (2012) Engagement with opioid maintenance treatment and reductions in crime: a longitudinal national cohort study. Addiction 107:393–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooney NL, Babor TF, DiClemente CC, Del Boca FK (2003) Clinical and scientific implications of project MATCH. In: Babor TF, Del Boca FK (eds) Treatment matching in alcoholism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 222–237Google Scholar
  11. Donald M, Dower J, Kavanagh D (2005) Integrated versus non-integrated management and care for clients with co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders: a qualitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Soc Sci Med 60:1371–1383PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eibner C, Morral A, Pacula RL, MacDonald J (2006) Is the drug court model exportable? An examination of the cost-effectiveness of a Los Angeles-based DUI court. J Subst Abus Treat 31(1):75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glaser FB, Greenberg SW, Barrett M (1978) A systems approach to alcohol treatment. Alcohol Research Foundation, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  14. Gustafson DH, Quanbeck AR, Robinson JM et al (2013) Which elements of improvement collaboratives are most effective? A cluster-randomized trial. Addiction 108:1145–1157PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holder H, Parker RN (1992) Effect of alcoholism treatment on cirrhosis mortality: a 20-year multivariate time series analysis. Br J Addict 87:1263–1274PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Humphreys K (2004) Circles of recovery: self-help organizations for addictions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  17. Humphreys K, McLellan T (2011) A policy-oriented review of strategies for improving the outcomes of services for substance use disorder patients. Addiction 106:2058–2066PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huntington D, Banzon E, Recidoro Z (2012) A system approach to improving maternal health in the Philippines. Bull World Health Organ 90:104–110PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Institute of Medicine (1990) Broadening the base of treatment for alcohol problems. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Klingemann H, Hunt G (eds) (1998) Treatment systems in an international perspective: drugs, demons and delinquents. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi, pp 3–19Google Scholar
  21. Klingemann H, Takala JP, Hunt G (1992) Cure, care or control: alcoholism treatment in sixteen countries. State University of New York Press, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  22. Klingemann H, Takala JP, Hunt G (1993) The development of alcohol treatment systems: an international perspective. Alcohol Health Res World 3:221–227Google Scholar
  23. Kuussaari K, Partanen A (2010) Administrative challenges in the Finnish alcohol and drug treatment system. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs 27:667–684Google Scholar
  24. Madras B, Compton W, Avulac D, Stegbauerc T, Steinc J, Clark HW (2009) Screening, brief interventions, referral to treatment (SBIRT) for illicit drug and alcohol use at multiple healthcare sites: Comparison at intake and 6 months later. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 99:280–295PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mäkelä K, Room R, Single E, Sulkunen P, Walsh B (1981) Alcohol, society, and the state. A comparative study of alcohol control, vol 1. Alcohol Research Foundation, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  26. Mann RE, Smart R, Anglin L, Rush B (1988) Are decreases in liver cirrhosis rates a result of increased treatment for alcoholism. Br J Addict 83:683–688PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marsch L (1998) The efficacy of methadone maintenance interventions in reducing illicit opiate use, HIV risk behavior and criminality: a meta-analysis. Addiction 93:515–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McCrady B, Miller W (1993) Research on alcoholic anonymous. Opportunities and alternatives. Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  29. McRee B, Tait E, Hernandez A, Del Boca F, Aldridge A, Dowd W (in press) SBIRT program impact on existing medical and substance abuse treatment systems. AddictionGoogle Scholar
  30. Myers B, Louw J, Pasche S (2011) Gender differences in barriers to alcohol and other drug treatment in Cape Town, South Africa. Afr J Psychiatry (South Afr) 14:146–153Google Scholar
  31. Niccols A, Milligan K, Smith A et al (2012) Integrated programs for mothers with substance abuse issues and their children: a systematic review of studies reporting on child outcomes. Child Abuse Negl 36:308–322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ouimette PC, Finney JW, Gima K, Moos RH (1999) A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: examining mechanisms underlying patient-treatment matching hypotheses for 12-step and cognitive-behavioral treatments for substance abuse. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 23:545–551PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ritter A, Berends L, Clemens C, Devaney M, Bowen K, Tiffen R (2003) Pathways: a review of the Victorian drug treatment service system. Final report. Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  34. Ritter A, Chalmers J, Sunderland M (2013) Planning for drug treatment services: estimating population need and demand for treatment drug policy modelling program. National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales. http://economia.uniandes.edu.co/content/download/46991/393951/file/Alison_Ritter.pdf
  35. Room R (2010) Alcohol and drug treatment systems: what is meant, and what determines their development. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs 27:575–579Google Scholar
  36. Rush B (2010) Tiered frameworks for planning substance use service delivery systems: Origins and key principles. Nordic Stud Alcohol and Drugs 27:617–636Google Scholar
  37. Rush B, Tremblay J, Fougere C, Perez W, Fineczko J (2013) Development of a needs-based planning model for substance use services and supports in Canada: Final report. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ONGoogle Scholar
  38. Seale JP, Monteiro M (2008) The dissemination of screening and brief intervention for alcohol problems in developing countries: lessons from Brazil and South Africa. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs 25:565–577Google Scholar
  39. Seppä K, Kuokkanen M (2008) Implementing brief alcohol intervention in primary and occupational health care. Reflections on two Finnish projects. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs 25:505–514Google Scholar
  40. Smart RG, Mann RE (2000) The impact of programs for high-risk drinkers on population levels of alcohol problems. Addiction 95:37–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Souria JC (1990) A history of alcoholism. Basil Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Souza-Formigoni M, Boerngen-Lacerda R, Vianna VP (2008) Implementing screening and brief intervention in primary care units in two Brazilian states: a case study. Nordic Stud Alcohol Drugs 25:553–564Google Scholar
  43. Stenius K, Witbrodt J, Engdahl B, Weisner C (2010) For the marginalized, or for the integrated? A comparative study of the treatment systems in Sweden and the US. Contemp Drug Probl 37:417–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Timko C, Moos RH, Finney JW, Lesar MD (2000) Long-term outcomes of alcohol use disorders: comparing untreated individuals with those in alcoholics anonymous and formal treatment. J Stud Alcohol 61:529–538PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ungemack J, Babor TF, Bidiorini A (2001) Connecticut compendium on substance abuse treatment need. Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, HartfordGoogle Scholar
  46. Walsh DC, Hingson RW, Merrigan DM, Levenson SM, Cupples LA, Heeren T, Coffman GA, Becker CA, Barker TA, Hamilton SK, McGuire TG, Kelly CA (1991) A randomized trial of treatment options for alcohol-abusing workers. N Engl J Med 325:775–781PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. White W (1998) Slaying the dragon: the history of addiction treatment and recovery in America. Chestnut Health Systems, BloomingtonGoogle Scholar
  48. World Health Organization (2010) ATLAS on substance use: resources for the prevention and treatment of substance use disorders. WHO, FranceGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Community MedicineUniversity of Connecticut School of MedicineFarmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations