Advertisement

Rekonstruktive Tubenchirurgie

  • Jürgen Kleinstein
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer Reference Medizin book series (SRM)

Zusammenfassung

Die rekonstruktive Tubenchirurgie ist ein Teilgebiet der organerhaltenden Operationen in der Gynäkologie. Als weitere Teilgebiete dieses Komplexes sind die Myomenukleation, die Resektion von Endometriose und Adhäsionen sowie die Korrektur von Fehlbedingungen des inneren Genitales zu nennen. Zunehmende Bedeutung hat der Fertilitätserhalt bei benignen und malignen Erkrankungen mittels Ovartransposition oder Ovarpräservation. Im weitesten Sinne gehören aber auch die Inkontinenz- und Prolapschirurgie zur rekonstruktiven Chirurgie in der Gynäkologie.

Literatur

  1. Bloechle M, Schreiner T, Lisse K (1997) Case report: recurrence of hydrosalpinges after transvaginal aspiration of tubal fluid in a cycle and the developement of a serometra. Hum Reprod 12:703–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Boeckxstaens A, Devroey P, Collins J, Tournaye H (2007) Getting pregnant after tubal sterilization: surgical reversal or IVF? Hum Reprod 22:2660–2664CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Boer-Meisel ME, te Velde ER, Habbema IDF, Kardaun WPF (1986) Predicting the pregnancy outcome in patients treated for hydrosalpinx: a prospective study. Fertil Steril 45:23–29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F, Merlet F, Nisand I, Philippe HI (1999) Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum Reprod 14:1243–1249CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Eytan O, Azem F, Gull I, Wolman I, Elad D, Jaffa AJ (2001) The mechanism of hydrosalpinx in embryo implantation. Hum Reprod 16:2662–2667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Gargiulo AR, Nezhat C (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopy, natural orifice transluminal endoscopy, and single-site laparoscopy in reproductive surgery. Semin Reprod Med 29:155–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gomel V (1977) Reconstructive surgery of the oviduct. J Reprod Med 18:181–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Gomel V (1983) Salpingo-ovariolysis by laparoscopy in infertility. Fertil Steril 34:607–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gomel V (2010) Chapter 23. Reproductive surgery. In: Gomel V, Brill AI (Hrsg) Reconstructive and reproductive surgery in gynecology. Informa Healthcare, London, S 259–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gordts S, Campo R, Puttemans P, Gordts S (2009) Clinical factors determening pregnancy outcome after microsurgical tubal reanastomosis. Fertil Steril 92:1198–1202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hanafi MM (2003) Factors affecting the pregnancy rate after microsurgical reversal of tubal ligation. Fertil Steril 80:434–440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson N, van Voorst S, Sowter MC, Strandell A, Mol BWJ (2011) Tubal surgery before IVF. Hum Reprod Update 17:3CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lindig T (2001) Wertigkeit der mikrochirurgischen Korrektur von Hydrosalpingen für die assistierte Reproduktion. Dissertation Med Fak Univ MagdeburgGoogle Scholar
  14. Meyer WR, Castelbaum AJ, Somkuti S, Sagoskin AW, Doyle M, Harris JE, Lessey BA (1997) Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity. Hum Reprod 12:1393–1398CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Petrucco OM, Silber SJ, Chamberlain SL, Warnes GM, Davies M (2007) Live birth following ay surgery reversal of female sterilisation in women older than 40 years: a realistic option in Australia? Med J Aust 187(5):271–273PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Reich H, Mcglynn F, Parente C, Sekel L, Levie M (1993) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1:16–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Saravelos HG, Li TC, Cook ID (1995) An analysis of the outcome of microsurgical and laparoscopic adhesiolysis for infertility. Hum Reprod 10:2887–2894CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Steptoe PC, Edwards RG (1978) Birth after the implantation of a human embryo. Lancet 2:336Google Scholar
  19. Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenström U, Thorburn J, Janson PO, Hamberger L (1999) Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective, randomized multicentre trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum Reprod 14:2762–2769CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenström U, Thorburn J (2001) Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: cumulative results after salpingectomy in a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod 16:2403–2410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Swolin K (1975) Electro microsurgery and salpingostomy: long-term results. Am J Obstet Gynecol 121:418–419CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Yoon TK, Sung HR, Kang HG, Cha SH, Lee CN, Cha KY (1999) Laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: fertility outcome in 202 cases. Fertil Steril 72:1121–1126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Yossry M, Aboulghar M, D’Angelo A, Gillet W (2010) In vitro fertilisation versus tubal reanastomosis (sterilisation reversal) for subfertility after tubal sterilisation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (3):CD004144Google Scholar
  24. Zeyneloglu HB, Arici A, Olive DL (1998) Adverse effects of hydrosalpinx on pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 70:492–499CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Zentrum für Frauen medizin Department für Reproduktionsmedizin und Gyn. EndokrinologieHelios Klinik Jerichower LandBurgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations