Skip to main content

Flatness

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering
  • 110 Accesses

Synonyms

Deviation from flatness; Flatness deviation; Planeness

Definition

The minimum distance separating two parallel planes between which the surface can be contained.

Theory and Application

Scale of Flatness

Although in theory there is no minimum or maximum, in engineering practice we take as minimum size the field of view of a microscope, even an STM type, and as a maximum the size of large telescope mirrors or very large surface plates. This means that sizes where flatness is relevant can range between a few nm2 and a few m2.

A flatness deviation is a geometrical error, where this error is determined, implicitly or explicitly, for surface wavelengths from a minimum value, while all longer wavelengths that define the geometrical deviation are not filtered. This implies that the bandwidth can be rather small when flatness is assessed over a course grid. For example, for a square grid, this implies that surface wavelengths smaller than twice the pitch are neglected and are assumed...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 869.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Creath K, Wyant JC (1990) Absolute measurement of surface roughness. Appl Opt 29:3823–3827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debenham M, Dew GD (1980) Determination gravitational deformation of an optical flat by liquid surface interferometry. Precis Eng 2:93–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drescher J (2003) Analytical estimation of measurement uncertainty in surface plate calibration by the Moody method using differential levels. Precis Eng 27:323–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans CJ, Davies AD (2013) Certification, self-calibration and uncertainty in optical surface testing. Int J Precision Technol 3(4):388–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans CJ, Kestner RN (1996) Test optics error removal. Appl Opt 35:1015–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans CJ, Tyler Estler W (1996) Self-calibration: reversal, redundancy, error separation, and ‘Absolute Testing’. Ann CIRP 45(2):617–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans CJ, Parks PE, Sullivan PJ, Taylor JS (1995) Visualization of surface figure by the use of Zernike polynomials. Appl Opt 34:7815–7819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geckeler RD, Weingärtner I (2002) Sub-nm topography measurement of large flats: an ultra-precise flatness standard for semiconductor industry. Proc SPIE 4779:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geckeler RD, Just A, Probst R, Weingärtner I (2002) Sub-nm-Topographiemessung mit hochgenauen Autokollimatoren [Sub-nm topography measurements with highly accurate autocollimators]. Tech Mess 69:535–541 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzanna J, Schultz G (1990) Absolute testing of flatness standards at square grid points. Opt Commun 77:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haitjema H (1992) Uncertainty propagation in surface plate measurements. In: Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on dimensional metrology in production and quality control. ISMQC, Tampere, pp 304–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Haitjema H, Meijer J (1993) Evaluation of surface plate flatness measurements. Eur J Mech Eng 38:165–172

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 1011 (2012) GPS geometrical tolerancing – tolerances of form, orientation, location and run-out. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 12781-1 (2011) GPS-flatness-part 1: vocabulary and parameters of flatness. ISO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer J (1989) From straightness to flatness: about surface plate measurement. Thesis, Twente University

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer J, de Bruijn W (1981) Determination of flatness from straightness measurements and characterization of the surface by four parameters. Precis Eng 3:17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moody JC (1955) How to calibrate surface plates in the plant. Tool Eng 1955:85–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell I, Goulet E (1998) Absolute figure measurements with a liquid-flat reference. Appl Opt 37:2579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zernike, F (1934) Beugungstheorie des Schneidenverfahrens und seine verbesserten Form, der Phasenkontrastmethode. [Diffraction theory of the knife-edge test and its improved form, the phase-contrast method] Physica 1 :689–704 (in German)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Haitjema .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 CIRP

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Haitjema, H. (2019). Flatness. In: Chatti, S., Laperrière, L., Reinhart, G., Tolio, T. (eds) CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53120-4_16794

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics