CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering

2019 Edition
| Editors: Sami Chatti, Luc Laperrière, Gunther Reinhart, Tullio Tolio

Synthesis

  • Juan Manuel Jauregui-BeckerEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53120-4_16777

Synonyms

Definition

Generally speaking, synthesis can be defined as the composition or combination of parts – building blocks, elements – to create a new whole product, artifact, technology, machine, or graphic, whose ruling behavior emerges from the interaction of its constituent parts. In the context of design, synthesis follows different definitions (Chakrabarti 2002). The two most relevant to this work are “synthesis as designing” and “synthesis as solution generation.” In the first definition, synthesis is defined as an iterative process of solution generation and solution evaluation. The second definition narrows its scope to that of generation solutions.

Theory and Application

A synthesis process comprehends a complex combination of cognitive and mathematical mechanism (e.g., random generation, backward reasoning, abduction, case-based reasoning, and constraint-solving). Although no unified theory exists for explaining the nature of the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Becker JMJ (2010) From how much to how many. Managing complexity in routine design automation. PhD thesis, Gilde Print, EnschedeGoogle Scholar
  2. Chakrabarti A (2002) Engineering design synthesis: understanding approaches and tools. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandrasekaran B, Goel A et al (1993) Functional representation as design rationale. IEEE Comp 26:48–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gero JS, Kannengiesser U (2004) The situated function–behaviour–structure framework. Des Stud 25:373–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. McMahon CA (1994) Observations on modes of incremental change in design. J Eng Des 5(3):195–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Pahl G, Beitz W et al (2007) Engineering design: a systematic approach. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Schotborgh WO, McMahon C, van Houten FJAM (2012) A knowledge acquisition method to model parametric engineering design processes. Int J Comput Aided Eng Technol 4(4):373–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Umeda Y, Tomiyama T (1995) FBS modeling: modeling scheme of function for conceptual design. Working papers of the 9th international workshop on qualitative reasoning about physical systems, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. Umeda Y, Tomiyama T (1997) Functional reasoning in design. IEEE Expert Intell Syst Appl 12(2):42–48Google Scholar
  10. Webber C (2005) CPM/PDD – an extended theoretical approach to modelling products and product development processes. In: 2nd German–Israeli symposium on advances in methods and systems for development of products and processes, Fraunhofer-IRB-Verlag, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  11. Zhang WJ, Lin Y, Niraj S (2005) On the function-behavior-structure model for design. The 2nd CDEN Conference, Alberta, 18–20 July. CD ROM, 8Google Scholar

Copyright information

© CIRP 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Design, Production and ManagementUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Section editors and affiliations

  • Eric Lutters
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Twente, Faculty of Engineering Technology Laboratory of Design, Production and ManagementEnschedeThe Netherlands