Rho Family Proteins
Synonyms
Definition
The Rho branch of the Ras superfamily. To date, 20 distinct mammalian Rho family proteins have been identified. Based on sequence and/or functional similarities, the 20 human Rho family GTPases are subdivided into the RhoA-related subfamily (RhoA, RhoB, and RhoC), the Rac1-related subfamily (Rac1, Rac1b, Rac2, and Rac3), the Cdc42-related subfamily (Cdc42, TC10, TCL, Wrch-1, and Chp/Wrch-2), the Rnd subfamily (Rnd1, Rnd2, and Rnd3/RhoE), and the RhoBTB subfamily (RhoBTB1 and RhoBTB2/DBC2). The RhoD, Rif, and RhoH/TTF proteins do not fall into any of these subfamilies. Generally, members of a subfamily are regulated by common RhoGEFs and RhoGAPs and utilize overlapping effectors. However, some Rho family proteins are GTPase deficient and constitutively GTP bound and may not be regulated by GEFs or GAPs
Characteristics
Primary structure of Rho GTPases. Rho GTPases are comprised of an amino terminal G domain that is characterized by consensus GDP/GTP-binding motifs shared with other GTP-binding proteins and a carboxyl terminal CAAX tetrapeptide sequence (C cysteine, A aliphatic amino acid, X terminal amino acid). Residue numbers for the switch I (SI), switch II (SII), and core effector (E) sequences correspond to those of analogous residues of human Ras proteins. Triangle indicates Rho insert sequences positioned between Ras residues 122 and 123. The terminal X residue dictates modification by FTase (X = Ser, Met, Ala) or GGTaseI (X = Leu). While the CAAX-signaled modifications are necessary for Rho GTPase membrane association, additional sequences upstream of the CAAX motif (hypervariable region) contain sequence elements (palmitoylated cysteines or polybasic sequences) that are required for proper subcellular localization and membrane association
Posttranslational processing of Rho GTPases is necessary for membrane association. (a) The majority of Rho family GTPases terminate with CAAX tetrapeptide sequences that signal posttranslational processing required for membrane association and function. The first step is catalyzed by either farnesyltransferase (FTase)- or geranylgeranyltransferase I (GGTaseI)-stimulated covalent modification of the cysteine residue by a C15 farnesyl or C20 geranylgeranyl isoprenoid. Rce1 catalyzes proteolytic cleavage of the AAX residues, and Icmt catalyzes carboxylmethylation of the now terminal prenylated cysteine residue. (b) Rho GTPase membrane association typically requires a second signal provided by sequences directly upstream by either palmitoylated cysteines or lysine or arginine-rich sequences. RhoBTB proteins lack CAAX motifs and are not predicted to undergo posttranslational lipid modification. Shown are the verified or predicted (*) membrane targeting and posttranslational modifications of the carboxyl terminal sequences of Rho GTPases
Cellular and Molecular Regulation
Rho family proteins function as GDP/GTP-regulated binary switches. In response to extracellular stimuli, RhoGEFs stimulate formation of active Rho-GTP, which in turn forms complexes with various downstream effectors (designated E) to initiate downstream signaling events. RhoGAPs serve as negative regulators of the GDP/GTP cycle and stimulate GTP hydrolysis. Deregulated Rho GTPase activity can occur by upregulated activation of RhoGEFs (e.g., fusion protein, missense mutation, phosphorylation), loss of function of RhoGAPs (e.g., deletion, promoter methylation), and altered gene expression of Rho GTPases, RhoGEFs, and RhoGAPs. Deregulated expression of RhoGDIs can lead to altered membrane association of Rho GTPases
The second class of regulators of Rho family proteins is GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that stimulate the weak intrinsic GTP hydrolysis activity of Rho family proteins to promote formation of the inactive GDP-bound protein. Presently, at least 60 RhoGAPs have been identified (e.g., chimerins, BCR). The third class of regulators is the Rho guanine nucleotide dissociation inhibitory (GDI) factors. While RhoGDIs can inhibit GDP dissociation as well as GAP-stimulated GTP hydrolysis, their main cellular function involves regulation of the association of Rho family proteins with membranes. To date, three distinct Rho GDIs have been identified.
Structural analyses of Ras and Rho family proteins reveal that the GDP- and GTP-bound proteins differ in conformation in two regions, designated switch I and switch II (Fig. 2). The conformation of the GTP-bound protein results in increased binding affinity for downstream effector proteins. Each Rho family protein recognizes multiple effectors, and some effectors are recognized by multiple Rho family proteins. Rho family protein interaction and activation of effector function lead to the stimulation of effector-mediated cytoplasmic signaling pathways that regulate the diverse functions of Rho family proteins. The effectors for RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 have been the most intensively studied and characterized. The multitude of effectors identified for each Rho family protein reflects the complex and diverse functional properties of these proteins.
Genetically engineered structural mutants of Rho family proteins have provided very useful research reagents to evaluate the biochemical and biological functions of Rho family proteins. The first class of mutants is gain-of-function mutants. Single amino acid substitutions at residues analogous to those that convert normal Ras proteins into highly oncogenic, constitutively activated proteins (at Ras residues glycine 12 or glutamine 61) also create constitutively activated mutants of Rho family proteins. These mutations render Ras and Rho proteins insensitive to GAP stimulation, and thus, these proteins persist in the GTP-bound state. The second class of mutants is dominant-negative mutants that contain a serine to asparagine substitution at the residue analogous to amino acid 17 of Ras proteins. These mutants can prevent activation of specific Rho family proteins, presumably by forming inactive complexes with specific Dbl family proteins. The third class of mutants is effector domain mutants that possess single amino acid substitutions in the core effector domain. These impair interaction of Rho family proteins with downstream effectors, thus leading to impairment in biological activity. Since a particular effector domain mutation leads to differential impairment of effector interaction, such mutants have been very useful reagents in establishing the specific contribution of different effector targets to Rho family protein function.
Functions
Rho family proteins regulate extracellular stimulus-activated actin cytoskeletal organization. Extracellular stimuli that activate cell surface G protein-coupled receptors, for example, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and bradykinin, or receptor tyrosine kinases (e.g., platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF)) cause Rho GTPase-dependent actin reorganization. LPA activates RhoA and causes formation of actin stress fibers, whereas bradykinin activation causes formation of actin microspikes and filopodia. PDGF activates Rac and accumulation of cortical actin at the leading edge of migrating cells and formation of lamellipodia and membrane ruffling. Shown are immunofluorescence analyses of NIH 3 T3 mouse fibroblasts stimulated with the indicated ligand (provided by Dr. Cercina Onesto). NIH 3 T3 cells were incubated for 16 h in serum-free growth medium, and the cultures were then stimulated for 15 min with the indicated ligand and then fixed, and actin filaments were visualized with Alexa phalloidin. Scale bar represents 20 μm
-
A first major function of Rho family proteins involves their regulation of actin cytoskeletal organization. For example, extracellular stimuli that activate cell surface GPCRs (e.g., lysophosphatidic acid, thrombin) or integrins (e.g., fibronectin) cause activation of cytoplasmic signaling cascades that promote the formation of actin stress fibers and focal adhesions (Fig. 3).
-
A second major function of Rho family proteins involves the stimulation of cytoplasmic signaling pathways that regulate the activity of nuclear transcription factors. These transcription factors include those that regulate genes involved in the regulation of cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. For example, Rac1 and Cdc42 activate the Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs; also called SAPKs), and activated Jun can stimulate transcription from promoters containing AP-1 DNA-binding motifs. RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 are activators of the NF-kB transcription factor. NF-kB regulates the expression of genes that serve an anti-apoptotic function. Rho family proteins activate the serum response factor (SRF), which forms a complex with ternary complex factors (e.g., Elk-1) at the serum response DNA element in promoter sequences of growth factor early response genes (e.g., fos).
-
A third major function of Rho family proteins involves their regulation of cellular proliferation. RhoA, Rac1, and Cdc42 have been shown to be essential components required for cells to progress through the G1 phase of the cell cycle. Constitutively activated mutants of some Rho family proteins can promote G1 progress and DNA synthesis in quiescent cells and growth transformation of rodent fibroblasts. Extracellular signals that regulate cell proliferation cause transient activation of specific Rho family proteins. For example, platelet-derived growth factor is a potent growth factor for many cell types and is an activator of Rac1 function. Hence, Rho family proteins may facilitate the mitogenic actions initiated by extracellular stimuli.
Clinical Relevance
There is presently considerable experimental evidence linking Rho family proteins to cancer (Fig. 4). Unlike Ras, where mutational activation of Ras proteins is associated with 25% of human cancers, mutationally activated Rho GTPases are not found commonly in cancer. Rac1 activating mutations are found in melanoma, whereas apparent loss-of-function mutations in RhoA are found in gastric adenocarcoma. Instead, more commonly indirect mechanisms that include altered gene transcription or the altered function of Rho regulators are most commonly observed. For example, the Vav1 RhoGEF, normally hematopoietic cell restricted in expression, is ectopically overexpressed and activated in pancreatic cancers. Tiam1, a Rac-specific GEF, functions as an effector of Ras and is required for Ras-mediated oncogenesis. Ras binds to and activates Tiam1, leading to persistent Rac activation. The expression of DLC-1 and related RhoGAPs is lost in a wide variety of human cancers. Since DLC-1 (deleted in liver cancer 1) functions as a negative regulator of RhoA, the loss of DLC-1 may promote oncogenesis by causing persistent RhoA activation. Rac1b is a splice variant of Rac1 that is preferentially expressed in breast and colon cancers. Unlike Rac1, Rac1b is persistently activated and cannot bind RhoGDI and, consequently, is a transforming variant of Rac1.
Aberrant Rho GTPase function is also associated with other human diseases. Oligophrenin-1 is a RhoGAP whose expression is lost and involved in nonspecific X-linked mental retardation. FGD1 is a Cdc42-specific RhoGEF that is mutated and inactivated in Aarskog-Scott syndrome (also called faciogenital dysplasia), which is a rare, clinically and genetically heterogeneous condition characterized by facial dysmorphic features, short stature, brachydactyly, and genital anomalies. Salmonella typhimurium, Yersinia pestis, Shigella flexneri, and other virulent bacteria have evolved mechanisms that alter the Rho GTPase function of their human host cells that facilitate their ability to promote infection and disease. Salmonella typhimurium causes typhoid fever, Yersinia pestis was the causative agent for the Black Death plague which accounted for the death of approximately one-third of the European population in the fourteenth century, and Shigella flexneri causes dysentery. These bacteria use a type III secretion system to deliver bacterial effector proteins directly into the host cell. These function as activators or inactivators of human Rho GTPases and include proteins that act as RhoGEFs or RhoGAPs. Since bacteria do not possess Rho GTPases that are regulated by these effector proteins, these proteins exist solely for the purpose of deregulating the cellular functions of host cells.
References
- Cox AD, Fesik SW, Kimmelman AC, Luo J, Der, CJ (2014) Drugging the undruggable Ras: mission possible? Nat Rev Drug Discov 13:828–851Google Scholar
- Jaffe AB, Hall A (2005) Rho GTPases: biochemistry and biology. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21:247–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ridley AJ (2006) Rho GTPases and actin dynamics in membrane protrusions and vesicle trafficking. Trends Cell Biol 16:522–529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sahai E, Marshall CJ (2002) RHO-GTPases and cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2:133–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wennerberg K, Der CJ (2004) Rho-family GTPases: it’s not only Rac and Rho (and I like it). J Cell Sci 117:1301–1312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar




