Monozygotic, monochorionic, and isosexual twins united by a part of their anatomy are known as Conjoined Twins. This is a rare and fascinating malformation that represents one of the more complex challenges of pediatric surgery. The twins are classified into two main groups: asymmetric and symmetric. Asymmetric ones are acardius acephalus, fetus-in-fetu, or heteropagus twins. In all these, only one component, the autositus supplying circulation, is viable. Symmetric twins are designated craniopagus, thoracopagus, omphalopagus, rachiopagus, ischiopagus, pygopagus, or parapagus according to the location of the joining bridge. This can be large and often contains shared organs. The cardiovascular systems of both components of the set are communicated and the internal environment is also shared to a variable extent.
Mortality is high before and after birth because of frequent and severe associated malformations. Viability of separation is difficult to determine and requires sophisticated imaging studies. Separation not only involves lengthy and complex operations but also difficult ethical decisions with familial, medical, and even court participation.
Separation, when possible, requires various groups of specialists under a strong leadership. Bony parts, nervous system, hearts, great vessels, digestive and genitourinary organs, as well as the skin and musculoskeletal tissues have to be divided and reconstructed to achieve separation with preservation for each component of as much function as possible. Survival is nearly impossible when the hearts are united, but it is possible for one or both twins in all the other forms. Complications are frequent and long-term quality of life is often burdened by fecal and urinary incontinence or by abnormal limbs and genitalia that are the price to pay for separation.
The quality of a pediatric surgical group is heavily put to test by these cases that can only be managed when outstanding expertise is available in the various specialties involved.
KeywordsConjoined Twin Acardius Acephalus Heteropagus Parasitic Craniopagus Thoracopagus Omphalopagus Ischiopagus Pygopagus Parapagus Separation Ethics
- Chiu CT, Hou SH, Lai HS, Lee PH, Lin FY, Chen WJ, Chen MT, Lin TW, Chu SH. Separation of thoracopagus conjoined twins. A case report. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1994;35(5):459–62.Google Scholar
- Martinez-Frias ML, Bermejo E, Mendioroz J, Rodriguez-Pinilla E, Blanco M, Egues J, Felix V, Garcia A, Huertas H, Nieto C, Lopez JA, Lopez S, Paisan L, Rosa A, Vazquez MS. Epidemiological and clinical analysis of a consecutive series of conjoined twins in Spain. J Pediatr Surg. 2009;44(4):811–20. Epub 2009/04/14PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Mutchinick OM, Luna-Munoz L, Amar E, Bakker MK, Clementi M, Cocchi G, da Graca Dutra M, Feldkamp ML, Landau D, Leoncini E, Li Z, Lowry B, Marengo LK, Martinez-Frias ML, Mastroiacovo P, Metneki J, Morgan M, Pierini A, Rissman A, Ritvanen A, Scarano G, Siffel C, Szabova E, Arteaga-Vazquez J. Conjoined twins: a worldwide collaborative epidemiological study of the international clearinghouse for birth defects surveillance and research. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2011;157C(4):274–87. Epub 2011/10/18PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rode H, Fieggen AG, Brown RA, Cywes S, Davies MR, Hewitson JP, Hoffman EB, Jee LD, Lawrenson J, Mann MD, Matthews LS, Millar AJ, Numanoglu A, Peter JC, Thomas J, Wainwright H. Four decades of conjoined twins at Red Cross Children’s Hospital – lessons learned. S Afr Med J. 2006;96(9 Pt 2):931–40.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Spencer R. Conjoined twins. Developmental malformations and clinical implications. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2003. 476 p.Google Scholar
- Szmuk P, Rabb MF, Curry B, Smith KJ, Lantin-Hermoso MR, Ezri T. Anaesthetic management of thoracopagus twins with complex cyanotic heart disease for cardiac assessment: special considerations related to ventilation and cross-circulation. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96(3):341–5.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar