Advertisement

Innovations in Minimally Invasive Surgery in Children

  • Todd A. PonskyEmail author
  • Gavin A. Falk
Reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of recent innovations in pediatric minimally invasive surgery that have enabled pediatric surgeons to operate safely on their smallest patients through tiny incisions. The development of size appropriate laparoscopes and instruments has been key in the development of this specialty. We also discuss NOTES, telemedicine, and robotic surgery in our pediatric population.

The numerous MIS techniques, originally used in the adult population, have been successfully applied to our pediatric patients. MIS has become routine for the treatment of many pediatric surgical disease processes, due to the numerous benefits these techniques confer on the patient: decreased wound complications, shorter length of stay, and improved postoperative pain. Inherent in the application of these complex techniques to infants and children are many risks due to the size of these patients. Pediatric surgeons must be aware and understand these risks if they are to successfully and safely practice MIS.

MIS will continue to develop as long as industry is committed to developing pediatric equipment to provide better care for our patients. Surgical training must continue to evolve, to ensure that the next generation of surgeons is adequately trained in these complex techniques. The future of pediatric MIS is exciting for our patients and indeed the specialty of pediatric surgery.

Keywords

Minimally invasive surgery Inguinal hernias Laparoscopy NOTES Telemedicine Robotic surgery 

References

  1. Abell TL, et al. Gastric electrical stimulation in intractable symptomatic gastroparesis. Digestion. 2002;66(4):204–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adikibi BT, et al. The risks of minimal access surgery in children: an aid to consent. J Pediatr Surg. 2012;47(3):601–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal S, Slovick A, Soon Y. Single-port laparoscopy for the drainage of abdominal infected fluid collections in children, with the TriPort system: initial experience of 2 cases. Surg Innov. 2010;17(3):261–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson JE, et al. The first national examination of outcomes and trends in robotic surgery in the United States. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(1):107–14; discussion 114–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ayinala S, et al. Temporary gastric electrical stimulation with orally or PEG-placed electrodes in patients with drug refractory gastroparesis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61(3):455–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berlinger NT. Robotic surgery – squeezing into tight places. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(20):2099–101.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blatnik JA, et al. Stitch versus scar – evaluation of laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair: a pilot study in a rabbit model. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22(8):848–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blinman T, Ponsky T. Pediatric minimally invasive surgery: laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in infants and children. Pediatrics. 2012;130(3):539–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bochner BH, et al. A randomized trial of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(4):389–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bruns NE, Soldes OS, Ponsky TA. Robotic surgery may not “Make the Cut” in pediatrics. Front Pediatr. 2015;3:10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cadière G-B, Buset M, et al. Antireflux transoral incisionless fundoplication using EsophyX: 12-month results of a prospective multicenter study. World J Surg. 2008a;32(8):1676–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cadière GB, Rajan A, et al. Endoluminal fundoplication by a transoral device for the treatment of GERD: a feasibility study. Surg Endosc. 2008b;22(2):333–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chandra V, et al. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices. Surgery. 2010;147(6):830–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper MA, et al. Underreporting of robotic surgery complications. J Healthc Qual. 2015;37(2):133–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cundy TP, et al. The first decade of robotic surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg. 2013;48(4):858–65.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dominguez G, et al. Retraction and triangulation with neodymium magnetic forceps for single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(7):1660–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Forster J, et al. Gastric pacing is a new surgical treatment for gastroparesis. Am J Surg. 2001;182(6):676–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Franklin ME, et al. Needlescopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned in 10 years of experience. JSLS. 2006;10(1):43–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Fujimoto T, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in newborn infants. Surg Endosc. 1999;13(8):773–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gagner M, Garcia-Ruiz A. Technical aspects of minimally invasive abdominal surgery performed with needlescopic instruments. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998;8(3):171–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geller EJ, Matthews CA. Impact of robotic operative efficiency on profitability. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209(1):20.e1–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hyman P, et al. Feasibility and safety of gastric electrical stimulation for a child with intractable visceral pain and gastroparesis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2009;49(5):635–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Islam S, et al. Gastric electrical stimulation for children with intractable nausea and gastroparesis. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(3):437–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Islam S, Adams SD, Mahomed AA. SILS: is it cost- and time-effective compared to standard pediatric laparoscopic surgery? Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:807609.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones VS, Cohen RC. Two decades of minimally invasive pediatric surgery-taking stock. J Pediatr Surg. 2008;43(9):1653–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kalfa N, et al. Tolerance of laparoscopy and thoracoscopy in neonates. Pediatrics. 2005;116(6):e785–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krpata DM, Ponsky TA. Instrumentation and equipment for single-site umbilical laparoscopic surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2011;20(4):190–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Krpata DM, Ponsky TA. Needlescopic surgery: what’s in the toolbox? Surg Endosc. 2013;27(3):1040–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lam TY, et al. Radially expanding trocar: a less painful alternative for laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2000;10(5):269–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee KW, et al. Two-port needlescopic cholecystectomy: prospective study of 100 cases. Hong Kong Med J. 2005;11(1):30–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee RS, et al. Pediatric robot assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: comparison with a cohort of open surgery. J Urol. 2006;175(2):683–7; discussion 687.Google Scholar
  32. Leroy J, et al. No-scar transanal total mesorectal excision: the last step to pure NOTES for colorectal surgery. JAMA Surg. 2013;148(3):226–30; discussion 231.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Marescaux J, et al. Transcontinental robot-assisted remote telesurgery: feasibility and potential applications. Ann Surg. 2002;235(4):487–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mattei P. Minimally invasive surgery in the diagnosis and treatment of abdominal pain in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2007;19(3):338–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meehan JJ. Robotic surgery for pediatric tumors. Cancer J. 2013;19(2):183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Meininger DD, et al. Totally endoscopic Nissen fundoplication with a robotic system in a child. Surg Endosc. 2001;15(11):1360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ming YC, et al. Experience of single-incision laparoscopy in children. Minim Access Surg. 2016;12(3):245–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mintz Y, et al. NOTES: a review of the technical problems encountered and their solutions. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2008;18(4):583–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Muls V, et al. Three-year results of a multicenter prospective study of transoral incisionless fundoplication. Surg Innov. 2013;20(4):321–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ostlie DJ, et al. Patient scar assessment after single-incision versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: long-term follow-up from a prospective randomized trial. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(6):553–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Padilla BE, et al. The use of magnets with single-site umbilical laparoscopic surgery. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2011;20(4):224–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Padilla BE, et al. Initial experience with magnet-assisted single trocar appendectomy in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(5):463–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Park MI, Camilleri M. Gastroparesis: clinical update. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(5):1129–39.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Park S, et al. Trocar-less instrumentation for laparoscopy: magnetic positioning of intra-abdominal camera and retractor. Ann Surg. 2007;245:379–84.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parkman HP, et al. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the diagnosis and treatment of gastroparesis. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(5):1592–622.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pearl JP, Ponsky JL. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a critical review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2008;12(7):1293–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Peters CA. Robotically assisted surgery in pediatric urology. Urol Clin N Am. 2004;31(4):743–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ponsky TA. Single port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in adults and children: tools and techniques. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(5):e1–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ponsky TA, Krpata DM. Single-port laparoscopy: considerations in children. J Minim Access Surg. 2011;7(1):96–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Ponsky TA, et al. Early experience with single-port laparoscopic surgery in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(4):551–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Riquelme M, Aranda A, Riquelme-Q M. Laparoscopic pediatric inguinal hernia repair: no ligation, just resection. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2010;20(1):77–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosser JC, Young SM, Klonsky J. Telementoring: an application whose time has come. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(8):1458–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Rothenberg SS, Shipman K, Yoder S. Experience with modified single-port laparoscopic procedures in children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(5):695–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saldaña LJ, Targarona EM. Single-incision pediatric endosurgery: a systematic review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013;23(5):467–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scott DJ, et al. Completely transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy using magnetically anchored instruments. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(12):2308–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shih SP, et al. Hybrid minimally invasive surgery – a bridge between laparoscopic and translumenal surgery. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(8):1450–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. St Peter SD, et al. Single incision versus standard 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 2011;254(4):586–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tagaya N, Rokkaku K, Kubota K. Needlescopic cholecystectomy versus needlescope-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17(5):375–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tichansky DS, Morton J, Jones DB. The SAGES manual of quality, outcomes and patient safety. New York: Springer Science+Business Media; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tsuda S. Teleproctoring in surgery. In: Tichansky DS, Morton J, Jones DB, editors. The SAGES manual of quality, outcomes and patient safety. New York: Springer; 2012. p. 513–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Velhote MCP, Velhote CEP. A NOTES modification of the transanal pull-through. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2009;19(2):255–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yee DS, et al. Initial comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open pyeloplasty in children. Urology. 2006;67(3):599–602.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Pediatric SurgeryAkron Children’s HospitalAkronUSA
  2. 2.Division of Pediatric SurgeryMiami Children’s HospitalMiamiUSA

Personalised recommendations