Advertisement

Principles of Pediatric Surgical Imaging

  • David ReaEmail author
  • Clare Brenner
  • Terence Montague
Reference work entry

Abstract

Imaging of children differs to the imaging of adults despite using very similar equipment. Infants and young children are often poorly cooperative to keep still, stay in a particular position or hold their breath. This varies with the age of the patient and affects all types of pediatric imaging examinations. Children suffer from different diseases and require different treatments. The care prior to, during, and following the examination differs from the care provided in adults. Most examinations require specific adjustments in children so the study is obtained optimally, safely, and with the least radiation exposure where possible.

Keywords

Pediatric radiology Effects of radiation on children Pediatric contrast agents Sedation/anesthesia in pediatric radiology Pediatric interventional radiology 

References

  1. Brenner DJ, Elliston CD, Hall EJ, Berdon WE. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brody AS, Frush DP, Huda W, Brent RL. Radiation risk to children from computed tomography. Pediatrics. 2007;120:677–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hao D, Ai T, Goerner F, Hu X, Runge VM, Tweedle M. MRI contrast agents: basic chemistry and safety. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;36(5):1060–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Henoy-Bhangle A, Nimkin K, Gee MS. Pediatric imaging: current and emerging techniques. J Postgrad Med. 2010;52(2):98–102.Google Scholar
  5. Jaimes C, Gee MS. Strategies to minimize sedation in pediatric body magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46(6):916–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Stacul F. Current iodinated contrast media. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(4):690–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Stacul F, van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Webb JA, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Almen T, Aspelin P, Bellin MF, Clement O, Heinz-Peer G, Contrast Media Safety Committee of European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR). Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(12):2527–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Thomas A, Miller JL, Couloures K, Johnson PN. Non-intravenous sedatives and analgesics for procedural sedation for imaging procedures in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2015;20(6):418–30.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. UNSCEAR. Corrigendum in May 2011 and May 2016 report sources and effects of ionizing radiation. Volume 1: sources. New York: United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, United Nations; 2008. http://www.unscear.org/unscear/en/publications/2008_1.htmlGoogle Scholar
  10. Weinreb JC, Kuo PH. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009;17(1):159–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyOur Lady’s Children’s HospitalDublinIreland
  2. 2.Department of AnesthesiaOur Lady’s Children’s HospitalDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations