Advertisement

The Epidemiology of Birth Defects

  • Edwin C. JesudasonEmail author
Reference work entry

Abstract

Birth defects are emerging as the leading cause of infant death worldwide. Their epidemiological investigation was prompted by the recognition of congenital rubella syndrome and of thalidomide-related phocomelia. Pediatric surgeons require good data on birth defects as a baseline for reporting their own outcomes. Hence, birth defects data are the foundation to quality control and improvement in neonatal surgery. However, good epidemiological study of birth defects is challenged practically by limited resources and dispersed populations and scientifically by prioritization of reductionist genetic investigations. Instead, it may be more helpful to see birth defects as complex systems problems, akin to surgical errors. As such, better understanding of birth defects may require surgeons equipped with “engineer style” training in statistics, modelling, and complex dynamic systems, rather than the current vogue for molecular biology approaches. Finally, birth defects are sensitive to widely different influences ranging from assisted reproduction to depleted uranium weapons. So for a broad swathe of population health issues, birth defects may provide an early warning signal – that can be heeded only with proper epidemiological measurement.

Keywords

Birth defects Epidemiology Epigenomics Complex systems Teratology Fetal diagnosis and therapy 

References

  1. Abrejo FG, Shaikh BT, Rizvi N. ‘And they kill me, only because I am a girl’... Review of sex-selective abortions in South Asia. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009;14:10–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed N. How the World Health Organisation covered up Iraq’s nuclear nightmare. The Guardian/Observer Newspaper, Sunday 13th October 2013.Google Scholar
  3. Ahn AC, Tewari M, Poon C-S, Phillips RS. The limits of reductionism in medicine: could systems biology offer an alternative? PLoS Med. 2006;3(6):e208.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Auger N, Fraser WD, Sauve R, Bilodeau-Bertrand M, Kosatsky T. Risk of congenital heart defects after ambient heat exposure early in pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2017;125(1):8–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ba’ath ME, Jesudason EC, Losty PD. How useful is the lung-to-head ratio in predicting outcome in the fetus with congenital diaphragmatic hernia? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007;30:897–906.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barker DJ. The origins of the developmental origins theory. J Intern Med. 2007;261:412–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernal AJ, Jirtle RL. Epigenomic disruption: the effects of early developmental exposures. Birth Defects Res Part A-Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88:938–44.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bittles AH. Consanguineous marriages and congenital anomalies. Lancet. 2013;382(9901):1316–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Botto LD, Flood T, Little J, Fluchel MN, Krikov S, et al. Cancer risk in children and adolescents with birth defects: a population-based cohort study. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e69077.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyd PA, Armstrong B, Dolk H, Botting B, Pattenden S, et al. Congenital anomaly surveillance in England – ascertainment deficiencies in the national system. Br Med J. 2005;330(7481):27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Busby C, Hamdan M, Ariabi E. Cancer, infant mortality and birth sex-ratio in Fallujah, Iraq 2005–2009. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2010;7:2828–37.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Campbell MC, Tishkoff SA. The evolution of human genetic and phenotypic variation in Africa. Curr Biol. 2010;20:R166–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carmona RH. The global challenges of birth defects and disabilities. Lancet. 2005;366:1142–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carozza SE, Langlois PH, Miller EA, Canfield M. Are children with birth defects at higher risk of childhood cancers? Am J Epidemiol. 2012;175:1217–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carter R, Mullassery D, See V, Theocharatos S, Pizer B, et al. Exploitation of chick embryo environments to reprogram MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma cells to a benign phenotype, lacking detectable MYCN expression. Oncogenesis. 2012;1:e24.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cho YH, Kim JK, Kim SH. A personalized recommender system based on web usage mining and decision tree induction. Expert Syst Appl. 2002;23:329–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Condon RJ, Bower C. Rubella vaccination and congenital-rubella syndrome in Western-Australia. Med J Aust. 1993;158:379–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Curry JI, McKinney P, Thornton JG, Stringer MD. The aetiology of gastroschisis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;107:1339–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cuschieri A. Surgical Innovation. 2003:10(3):141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davidz HL, Nightingale DJ. Enabling systems thinking to accelerate the development of senior systems engineers. Syst Eng. 2008;11:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davies MJ, Moore VM, Willson KJ, Van Essen P, Priest K, et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1803–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DiMasi JA, Grabowski HG, Vernon J. R&D costs and returns by therapeutic category. Drug Inf J. 2004;38:211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dindo D, Hahnloser D, Clavien P-A. Quality assessment in surgery riding a lame horse. Ann Surg. 2010;251:766–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duke CW, Correa A, Romitti PA, Martin J, Kirby RS. Challenges and priorities for surveillance of stillbirths: a report on two workshops. Public Health Rep. 2009;124:652–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Elowitz MB, Levine AJ, Siggia ED, Swain PS. Stochastic gene expression in a single cell. Science. 2002;297(5584):1183–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fairbanks TJ, Kanard RC, Del Moral PM, Sala FG, De Langhe SP, et al. Colonic atresia without mesenteric vascular occlusion. The role of the fibroblast growth factor 10 signaling pathway. J Pediatr Surg. 2005;40:390–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feldkamp ML, Carey JC, Sadler TW. Development of gastroschisis: review of hypotheses, a novel hypothesis, and implications for research. Am J Med Genet A. 2007;143A:639–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Forrester MB, Merz RD. Inclusion of early fetal deaths in a birth defects surveillance system. Teratology. 2001;64:S20–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gilbert SF, Sarkar S. Embracing complexity: organicism for the 21st century. Dev Dyn. 2000;219:1–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Goldberger AL, Amaral LAN, Hausdorff JM, Ivanov PC, Peng CK, et al. Fractal dynamics in physiology: alterations with disease and aging. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002;99:2466–72.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grosfeld JL, Rescorla FJ. Duodenal atresia and stenosis – reassessment of treatment and outcome based on antenatal diagnosis, pathological variance, and long-term follow-up. World J Surg. 1993;17:301–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grosse SD, Rogowski WH, Ross LF, Cornel MC, Dondorp WJ, et al. Population screening for genetic disorders in the 21st century: evidence, economics, and ethics. Public Health Genomics. 2010;13:106–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harrison MR, Bjordal RI, Langmark F, Knutrud O. Congenital diaphragmatic-hernia-hidden mortality. J Pediatr Surg. 1978;13:227–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harrison MR, Keller RL, Hawgood SB, Kitterman JA, Sandberg PL, et al. A randomized trial of fetal endoscopic tracheal occlusion for severe fetal congenital diaphragmatic hernia. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1916–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hattori S, Ieee. Spatio-temporal web sensors by social network analysis. 2012 Ieee/Acm International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (Asonam). 2012. p. 988–95.Google Scholar
  36. Hayden EC. The genome hacker. Nature. 2013;497(7448):172–4.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  37. Hindin R, Brugge D, Panikkar B. Teratogenicity of depleted uranium aerosols: a review from an epidemiological perspective. Environ Health: Glob Access Sci Source. 2005;4:17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Homer N, Szelinger S, Redman M, Duggan D, Tembe W, et al. Resolving individuals contributing trace amounts of DNA to highly complex mixtures using high-density SNP genotyping microarrays. PLoS Genet. 2008;4(8):e1000167.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hook EB, Czeizel AE. Can terathanasia explain the protective effect of folic-acid supplementation on birth defects? Lancet. 1997;350:513–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Horan ML. Parental reaction to the birth of an infant with a defect: an attributional approach. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 1982;5:57–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Horton R. Surgical research or comic opera: questions, but few answers. Lancet. 1996;347:984–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Horton R. What is the point of surgery? Lancet. 2010;376(9746):1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Islam AS, Miah SA. Transgenic plants: risks, concerns and effects on ecosystem and human health. Plant Tissue Cult Biotechnol. 2006;16(2):139–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jesudason EC. Challenging embryological theories on congenital diaphragmatic hernia: future therapeutic implications for paediatric surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2002;84:252–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jesudason EC, Connell MG, Fernig DG, Lloyd DA, Losty PD. Early lung malformations in congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35:124–7; discussion 128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Katz SB. The ethic of expediency – classical rhetoric, technology, and the Holocaust. Coll Engl. 1992;54:255–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Keijzer R, Liu J, Deimling J, Tibboel D, Post M. Dual-hit hypothesis explains pulmonary hypoplasia in the nitrofen model of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Am J Pathol. 2000;156:1299–306.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Khoury MJ. Epidemiology of birth defects. Epidemiol Rev. 1989;11:244–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kilby MD. The incidence of gastroschisis – is increasing in the UK, particularly among babies of young mothers. Br Med J. 2006;332:250–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lippman A. Led (Astray) by genetic maps – the cartography of the human genome and health-care. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35:1469–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lumley J. Defining the problem: the epidemiology of preterm birth. Bjog Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2003;110:3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marshall AC. Gulf war depleted uranium risks. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008;18:95–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. McCulloch P, Catchpole K. A three-dimensional model of error and safety in surgical health care microsystems. Rationale, development and initial testing. BMC Surg. 2011;11:23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Monif GRG, Avery GB, Korones SB, Sever JL. Postmortem isolation of Rubella virus from 3 children with Rubella-syndrome defects. Lancet. 1965;1(7388):723–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mortell A, Montedonico S, Puri P. Animal models in pediatric surgery. Pediatr Surg Int. 2006;22:111–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death (NCEPOD). Surgery in children: are we there yet? 2011. http://www.ncepod.org.uk/2011sic.html
  57. Nelson CM, Gleghorn JP. Sculpting organs: mechanical regulation of tissue development. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2012;14(14):129–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Nelson SM, Hajivassiliou CA, Haddock G, Cameron AD, Robertson L, et al. Rescue of the hypoplastic lung by prenatal cyclical strain. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;171:1395–402.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nichol PF, Reeder A, Botham R. Humans, mice, and mechanisms of intestinal atresias: a window into understanding early intestinal development. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:694–700.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Park JY, Park YW. Model-based concurrent systems design for safety. Concurr Eng-Res Appl. 2004;12:287–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Pasternak B, Svanstrom H, Molgaard-Nielsen D, Krause TG, Emborg HD, et al. Risk of adverse fetal outcomes following administration of a pandemic influenza A(H1N1) vaccine during pregnancy. JAMA-J Am Med Assoc. 2012;308:165–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pedersen RN, Calzolari E, Husby S, Garne E, Grp EW. Oesophageal atresia: prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and associated anomalies in 23 European regions. Arch Dis Child. 2012;97:227–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Piedrahita JA. The role of imprinted genes in fetal growth abnormalities. Birth Defects Res Part A-Clin Mol Teratol. 2011;91:682–92.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Putnam CE. Reform and innovation: a repeating pattern during a half century of medical education in the USA. Med Educ. 2006;40(3):227–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Reason J. A systems-approach to organizational error. Ergonomics. 1995;38:1708–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reason J. Human error: models and management. Br Med J. 2000;320:768–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rylander C, Odland JO, Sandanger TM. Climate change and environmental impacts on maternal and newborn health with focus on Arctic populations. Glob Health Action. 2011;4:8452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sheridan E, Wright J, Small N, Corry PC, Oddie S, et al. Risk factors for congenital anomaly in a multiethnic birth cohort: an analysis of the born in Bradford study. Lancet. 2013;382:1350–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Slaughter LM. Your genes and privacy. Science. 2007;316(5826):797.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Spitz L, Kiely EM, Morecroft JA, Drake DP. Oesophageal atresia: at-risk groups for the 1990s. J Pediatr Surg. 1994;29:723–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stege G, Fenton A, Jaffray B. Nihilism in the 1990s: the true mortality of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatrics. 2003;112:532–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stein LD. The case for cloud computing in genome informatics. Genome Biol. 2010;11:207.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stockley L, Lund V. Use of folic acid supplements, particularly by low-income and young women: a series of systematic reviews to inform public health policy in the UK. Public Health Nutr. 2008;11:807–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Taussig HB. Thalidomide and phocomelia. Pediatrics. 1962;30:654–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Thompson SM, Connell MG, Fernig DG, Ten Dam GB, van Kuppevelt TH, et al. Novel ‘phage display antibodies identify distinct heparan sulfate domains in developing mammalian lung. Pediatr Surg Int. 2007;23:411–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. Thompson SM, Fernig DG, Jesudason EC, Losty PD, van de Westerlo EMA, et al. Heparan sulfate phage display antibodies identify distinct epitopes with complex binding characteristics insights into protein binding specificities. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:35621–31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thompson SM, Jesudason EC, Turnbull JE, Fernig DG. Heparan sulfate in lung morphogenesis: the elephant in the room. Birth Defects Res Part C-Embryo Today-Rev. 2010;90(1):32–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Thompson SM, Connell MG, van Kuppevelt TH, Xu R, Turnbull JE, et al. Structure and epitope distribution of heparan sulfate is disrupted in experimental lung hypoplasia: a glycobiological epigenetic cause for malformation? BMC Dev Biol. 2011;11:38.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tinker SC, Reefhuis J, Dellinger AM, Jamieson DJ, Natl Birth Defects Prevention S. Maternal injuries during the periconceptional period and the risk of birth defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997–2005. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2011;25:487–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Turnbull J, Field RA. Emerging glycomics technologies. Nat Chem Biol. 2007;3(2):74–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Van Zutphen AR, Lin S, Fletcher BA, Hwang SA. A population-based case-control study of extreme summer temperature and birth defects. Environ Health Perspect. 2012;120(10):1443–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. de Vries J, Bull SJ, Doumbo O, Ibrahim M, Mercereau-Puijalon O, et al. Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries. BMC Med Ethics. 2011;12:5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Waddington CH. Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature. 1942;150:563–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wald N. Prevention of neural-tube defects-results of the medical-research-council vitamin study. Lancet. 1991;338:131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wjst M. Caught you: threats to confidentiality due to the public release of large-scale genetic data sets. BMC Med Ethics. 2010;11:21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wright R. The evolution of God: the origins of our beliefs: Abacus. 2010.Google Scholar
  87. Yu HYR, Ho SC, So KFE, Lo YL. Short communication: the psychological burden experienced by Hong Kong midlife women during the SARS epidemic. Stress Health. 2005;21:177–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NHS LothianEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations