Advertisement

Bindung, Partnerzufriedenheit und Kultur

  • Hans-Werner BierhoffEmail author
  • Elke Rohmann
Living reference work entry
  • 35 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

In diesem Beitrag gehen wir von der Bindungstheorie von Bowlby (1969/1982) aus. In diesem Zusammenhang gehen wir auf die Frage ein, wie Bindung gemessen wird. Wir führen einen Kulturvergleich der Messung von Bindungsstilen und Bindungsdimensionen zwischen den USA und Deutschland durch. Im Weiteren beantworten wir die Frage, ob individuelle Unterschiede in der Befolgung bestimmter Bindungsstile bzw. in der Betonung unterschiedlicher Bindungsdimensionen mit Partnerzufriedenheit zusammenhängt und ob sich kulturelle Unterschiede erkennen lassen, die diesen Zusammenhang modifizieren.

Schlüsselwörter

Bindung Emotionsregulation Kultur Partnerzufriedenheit Sicherheitsstreben 

Literatur

  1. Ainsworth, M., Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment. A psychological study of the Strange Situation. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Alonso-Arbiol, I., Nekane Balluerka, N., Shaver, P. R., & Gillath, O. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Spanish and American versions of the ECR adult attachment questionnaire. A comparative study. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 9–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Argyle, M. (2001). The psychology of happiness. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  4. Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Bokhorst, H., & Schuengel, C. (2004). The importance of shared environment on infant father attachment: A behavioural genetic study of the attachment Q-sort. Journal of Family Psychology, 18, 545–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category-model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berscheid, E., & Reis, H. T. (1998). Attraction and close relationships. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Hrsg.), Handbook of social psychology (Bd. 2, 4. Aufl., S. 193–281). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Bierhoff, H. W., & Fetchenhauer, D. (2006). How to explain prosocial and solidary behavior: A comparison of framing theory with related meta-theoretical paradigms. In D. Fetchenhauer, A. Flache, A. P. Buunk & S. Lindenberg (Hrsg.), Solidarity and prosocial behavior. An integration of sociological and psychological perspectives (S. 225–242). Washington, DC: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Bierhoff, H. W., & Rohmann, E. (2005). Was die Liebe stark macht. Eine neue Psychologie der Paarbeziehung. Reinbek: Rowohlt.Google Scholar
  9. Bierhoff, H.W., Grau, I., & Ludwig, A. (1993). Enge Beziehungen. Philipps-Universität Marburg, Unveröffentlichter Bericht.Google Scholar
  10. Bierhoff, H.W., Ambrosy, B., & Schmohr, M. (1996). Freundschafts- und Liebesbeziehungen in Abhängigkeit von Personenwahrnehmung. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Unveröffentlichter Bericht.Google Scholar
  11. Bierhoff, H. W., Rohmann, E., & Führer, A. (2016). Kulturelle Vielfalt in engen Beziehungen am Beispiel der Liebe. In P. Genkova & T. Ringeisen (Hrsg.), Handbuch Diversity Kompetenz. Band. 2: Gegenstandsbereiche (S. 327–340). Wiesbaden: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bokhorst, C. L., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., Fearon, R. M. P., van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Fonagy, P., & Schuengel, C. (2003). The importance of shared environment in mother-infant attachment security: A behavioral genetic study. Child Development, 74, 1188–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss (Vol. 1. Attachment). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Brennan, K. A., Shaver, P. R., & Tobey, A. E. (1991). Attachment styles, gender and parental drinking behavior. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 8, 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment. An integrative overview. In J. Simpson & W. Rholes (Hrsg.), Attachment theory and close relationships (S. 46–76). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  16. Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology (2. Aufl.). Boston: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  17. Crawford, T. N., Liveley, W. J., Jang, K. L., Shaver, P. R., Cohen, P., & Ganiban, J. (2007). Insecure attachment and personality disorder: A twin study of adults. European Journal of Personality, 21, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davila, J., Karney, B. R., & Bradbury, T. N. (1999). Attachment change processes in the early years of marriage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 783–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Del Giudice, M. (2011). Sex differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fraley, R. C. (2002). Attachment stability from infancy to adulthood: Meta-analysis and dynamic modeling of developmental mechanisms. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6, 123–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fraley, R. C., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2004). A dynamical systems approach to conceptualizing and studying stability and change in attachment security. In W. S. Rholes & J. A. Simpson (Hrsg.), Adult attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (S. 86–132). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  22. Fraley, R. C., Hudson, N. W., Hefferman, M. E., & Segal, N. (2015). Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109, 354–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirkpatrick, L. A., & Davis, K. E. (1994). Attachment style, gender, and relationship stability: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 502–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klohnen, E. C., & Luo, S. (2003). Interpersonal attraction and personality: What is attractive – self similarity, ideal similarity, complementarity, or attachment security? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 709–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., & Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success? Psychological Bulletin, 131, 803–855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maccoby, E. E. (1980). Social development. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  28. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Attachment in adulthood. Structure, dynamics, and change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Miller, G. (2007). Mating intelligence: Frequently asked questions. In G. Geher & G. Miller (Hrsg.), Mating intelligence. Sex relationships, and the Mind’s reproductive system (S. 367–393). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  30. Molero, F., Shaver, P. R., Fernandez, I., Alonso-Arbiol, I., & Recio, P. (2016). Long-term partners’ relationship satisfaction and their perceptions of each other’s attachment insecurities. Personal Relationships, 23, 159–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Neumann, E., Rohmann, E., & Bierhoff, H. W. (2007). Entwicklung und Validierung von Skalen zur Erfassung von Vermeidung und Angst in Partnerschaften: Der Bochumer Bindungsfragebogen (BoBi). Diagnostica, 53, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pietromonaco, P. R., & Barrett, L. F. (2000). The internal working models concept: What do we really know about the self in relation to others? Journal of General Psychology, 4, 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pinquart, M., Schwarzer, G., & Zimmermann, P. (2019). Entwicklungspsychologie – Kindes und Jugendalter (2. Aufl.). Göttingen: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
  34. Rohmann, E. (2008). Zufriedenheit mit der Partnerschaft und Lebenszufriedenheit. In E. Rohmann, M. J. Herner & D. Fetchenhauer (Hrsg.), Sozialpsychologische Beiträge zur Positiven Psychologie (S. 93–117). Lengerich: Pabst.Google Scholar
  35. Rohmann, E., Neumann, E., Herner, M. J., & Bierhoff, H. W. (2012). Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: Self-construal, attachment, and love in romantic relationships. European Psychologist, 17, 279–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schachner, D. A., Shaver, P. R., & Gillath, O. (2008). Attachment style and long-term singlehood. Personal Relationships, 15, 479–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shaver, P. R., Hazan, C., & Bradshaw, D. (1988). Love as attachment. The integration of three behavioral systems. In R. Sternberg & M. Barnes (Hrsg.), The psychology of love (S. 68–99). New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Van Ijzendoorn, M. H., & Kroonenberg, P. M. (1988). Cross-cultural patterns of attachment: A meta-analysis of the strange situation. Child Development, 59, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wei, M., Russell, D. W., Mallinckrodt, B., & Vogel, D. L. (2007). The Experiences in Close Relationships scale (ECR) – Short Form: Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wongpakaran, T., Wongpakaran, N., & Wedding, D. (2012). Gender differences, attachment styles, self-esteem and romantic relationships in Thailand. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 36, 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Arbeitseinheit SozialpsychologieRuhr-Universität BochumBochumDeutschland
  2. 2.Arbeitseinheit Sozialpsychologie, Fakultät für PsychologieRuhr-Universität BochumBochumDeutschland

Personalised recommendations