Advertisement

Qualitative Religionspsychologie

  • Ulrike Popp-BaierEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Part of the Springer Reference Psychologie book series (SRP)

Zusammenfassung

Eine Religionsforschung, die sich ausdrücklich als psychologisch begreift, hat sich im Kontext theologischer, religionswissenschaftlicher und psychologischer Forschung herausgebildet. Dabei bezeichnen Religion oder Spiritualität keinen Gegenstand, sondern deuten einen Diskurs an, an dem psychologische Forschung beteiligt ist. In diesem Kontext haben qualitative Forschungsansätze (phänomenologische Studien, qualitatives Experiment, psychoanalytische Interpretationen, Grounded-Theory-Methodologie, narrative Studien) immer eine Rolle gespielt, auch wenn sie gegenwärtig nur einen marginalen Platz einnehmen und qualitative Methoden häufig in Kombination mit quantitativen Methoden zum Einsatz kommen.

Schlüsselwörter

Religion Spiritualität Phänomenologische Studien Narrative Studien Methodenkombinationen 

Literatur

  1. Aanstoos, C. M. (1992). Toward a phenomenology of spiritual experience. Journal of the Psychology of Religion, 1, 81–90.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W. (1950). The individual and his religion. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Arnold, M. (2010). Das religiöse Selbst in der Mission: Eine kulturpsychologische Analyse missionarischen Handelns deutscher Protestanten. Hamburg: Verlag Dr. Kovač.Google Scholar
  4. Azari, N. P., Missimer, J., & Seitz, R. J. (2005). Religious experience and emotion: Evidence for distinctive cognitive neural patterns. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15, 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Band, M., Dein, S., & Loewenthal, K. M. (2011). Religiosity, coping, and suicidality within the religious Zionist community of Israel. Mental Health, Religion & Culture: A thematic qualitative analysis.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13674676.2010.548059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belzen, J. A. (2008). Autobiography, psychic functioning and mental health: The role of religion in personal life. In J. A. Belzen & A. Geels (Hrsg.), Autobiography and the psychological study of religious lives (S. 117–157). Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Belzen, J. A. (2010). Towards cultural psychology of religion. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Belzen, J. A. (2015). Religionspsychologie. Eine historische Analyse im Spiegel der Internationalen Gesellschaft. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Belzen, J. A., & Geels, A. (Hrsg.). (2008). Autobiography and the psychological study of religious lives. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  10. Brahier, G., & Johannsen, D. (Hrsg.). (2013). Konstruktionsgeschichten. Narrationsbezogene Ansätze in der Religionsforschung. Würzburg: Ergon.Google Scholar
  11. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Büssing, A., & Kohls, N. (2011). Spiritualität transdisziplinär. Wissenschaftliche Grundlagen im Zusammenhang mit Gesundheit und Krankheit. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Buitelaar, M. (2013). Constructing a Muslim self in a post-migration context: Continuity and discontinuity with parental voices. In M. Buitelaar & H. Zock (Hrsg.), Religious voices in self-narratives. Making sense of life in times of transition (S. 241–274). Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Buitelaar, M., & Zock, H. (Hrsg.). (2013). Religious voices in self-narratives. Making sense of life in times of transition. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  15. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3. Aufl.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Corveleyn, J., Luyten, P., & Dezutter, J. (2013). Psychodynamic psychology and religion. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Hrsg.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (S. 94–117). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Coyle, A. (2008). Qualitative methods and ‘the (partly) ineffable‘ in psychological research on religion and spirituality. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5(1), 56–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Day, J. M. (1993). Speaking of belief: Language, performance, and narrative in the psychology of religion. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 3, 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Day, J. M. (2013). Narration, identity, and human development: Cognitive-Developmental and discursive approaches to understanding religious voices in self-narratives. In M. Buitelaar & H. Zock (Hrsg.), Religious voices in self-narratives. Making sense of life in times of transition (S. 53–82). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  20. Dawson, L. L., & Cowan, D. E. (2004). Religion online. Finding faith on the internet. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. DeMarinis, V. (2000). The impact of postmodernization on existential health in Sweden: Psychology of religion’s function in existential public health analysis. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 30, 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dillon, M., & Wink, P. (2007). In the course of a lifetime. Tracing religious belief, practice, and change. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Engler, S. (2011). Grounded theory. In M. Stausberg & S. Engler (Hrsg.), The Routledge handbook of research methods in the study of religion (S. 256–274). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Erikson, E. H. (1958). Young man Luther: A study in psychoanalysis and history. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  25. Festinger, L., Riecken, H. W., & Schachter, S. (1956). When prophecy fails. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fowler, J. W. (1981). Stages of faith. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  27. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  28. Giorgi, A. (1985). Sketch of a psychological phenomenological method. Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ganzevoort, R. R. (2000). Violated and desecrated. Sexually abused males’ narrative construction of religion. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 23, 231–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ganzevoort, R. R., de Haardt, M., & Scherer-Rath, M. (Hrsg.). (2014). Religious stories we live by. Narrative approaches in theology and religious studies. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  31. Girgensohn, K. (1921). Der seelische Aufbau des religiösen Erlebens. Leipzig: Hirzel.Google Scholar
  32. Granqvist, P., & Kirkpatrick, L.A. (2008). Attachment and religious representations and behavior. In J. Cassedy & P.R. Shaver (Hrsg.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2. Aufl., S. 906–933). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hanegraaff, W. (2013). Western esotericism. A guide for the perplexed. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  34. Heiler, F. (1919). Das Gebet: Eine religionsgeschichtliche und religionspsychologische Untersuchung. München: Ernst Reinhardt.Google Scholar
  35. Höllinger, F., & Tripold, T. (2012). Ganzheitliches Leben. Das holistische Milieu zwischen neuer Spiritualität und postmoderner Wellness-Kultur. Bielefeld: transcript.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hood, R. W., Hill, P. C., & Spilka, B. (2018). The psychology of religion. An empirical approach (5. Aufl.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Hovi, T. (2013). Meanings of healing: Experiences of prayer-team members at the Christian healing rooms service in Finland. In H. Westerink (Hrsg.), Constructs of meaning and religious transformation. Current issues in the psychology of religion (S. 185–205). Göttingen: V & R unipress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hulstoft, H., Hestad, K. A., Lien, L., Møller, P., & Danbolt, L. J. (2013). „If I didn’t have my faith I would have killed myself!“: Spiritual coping in patients suffering from schizophrenia. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 23(2), 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hussain, D., & Bhushan, B. (2011). Cultural factors promoting coping among Tibetan refugees: A qualitative investigation. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 14(6), 575–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jacobson, C. J., Luckhaupt, S. E., Delaney, S., & Tsevat, J. (2006). Religio-biography, coping and meaning-making among persons with HIV/AIDS. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 45(1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. James, W. (1997). Die Vielfalt religiöser Erfahrung. Eine Studie über die menschliche Natur. Frankfurt a. M.: Insel. [Orig. 1902].Google Scholar
  42. Joas, H. (1997). Die Entstehung der Werte. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  43. Keller, B., Klein, C., Hood, R. W., & Streib, H. (2013). Deconversion and religious or spiritual transformation. In H. Westerink (Hrsg.), Constructs of meaning and religious transformation. Current issues in the psychology of religion (S. 119–139). Göttingen: V & R unipress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kimball, C. N., Boyatzis, C. J., Cook, K. V., Leonhard, K. C., & Planagan, K. S. (2013). Attachment to God: A qualitative exploration of emerging adults’ spiritual relationship with God. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 41(3), 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kleining, G. (1986). Das qualitative Experiment. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 38, 724–750.Google Scholar
  46. Koepp, W. (1920). Einführung in das Studium der Religionspsychologie. Tübingen: Mohr.Google Scholar
  47. Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined (2.Aufl.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  48. Laycock, J. P. (2012). „We are spirits of another sort“. Ontological rebellion and religious dimensions of the Otherkin community. Nova Religio: The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, 15(3), 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lindgren, T. (2004). The narrative construction of Muslim identity: A single case study. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 26, 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lindgren, T. (2014). Hjalmar Sundén’s impact on the study of religion in the Nordic countries. Temenos, 50(1), 39–61.Google Scholar
  51. Luhrmann, T. M. (1989). Persuasions of the witch’s craft: Ritual magic in contemporary England. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Luhrmann, T. M. (2012). When God talks back. Understanding the American Evangelical relationship with God. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  53. Lundmark, M. (2010). When Mrs B met Jesus during radiotherapy. A single case study of a Christic vision: Psychological prerequisites and functions and considerations on narrative methodology. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 32, 27–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mattis, J. S. (2002). Religion and spirituality in the meaning-making and coping experiences of African American women: A qualitative analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(4), 309–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. McAdams, D. P., & Albaugh, M. (2008). The redemptive self, generativity and American Christians at midlife: Explorations of the life stories of Evangelical and mainline Protestants. In J. A. Belzen & A. Geels (Hrsg.), Autobiography and the psychological study of religious lives (S. 255–286). Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  56. Mey, G., & Mruck, K. (2009). Methodologie und Methodik der Grounded Theory. In W. Kempf & M. Kiefer (Hrsg.), Forschungsmethoden der Psychologie. Zwischen naturwissenschaftlichem Experiment und sozialwissenschaftlicher Hermeneutik. Band 3: Psychologie als Natur- und Kulturwissenschaft. Die soziale Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit (S. 100–152). Berlin: Regener.Google Scholar
  57. Mey, G., & Mruck, K. (Hrsg.). (2011). Grounded Theory Reader (2., überarb. und erw. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS.Google Scholar
  58. Murken, S. (2002). Religionspsychologie in Deutschland: eine Bestandsaufnahme. Wege zum Menschen, 54, 185–196.Google Scholar
  59. Murken, S. (Hrsg.). (2008). Ohne Gott leben. Religionspsychologische Aspekte des „Unglaubens“. Marburg: Diagonal.Google Scholar
  60. Otto, R. (1917). Das Heilige: Über das Irrationale in der Idee des Göttlichen und sein Verhältnis zum Rationalen. Breslau: Trewendt & Granier.Google Scholar
  61. Paloutzian, R. F., & Park, C. L. (Hrsg.). (2013). Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  62. Park, C. L. (2013). Religion and meaning. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Hrsg.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (S. 357–379). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  63. Pfister, O. (1910). Die Frömmigkeit des Grafen Ludwig von Zinzendorf. Leipzig: Franz Deuticke.Google Scholar
  64. Pollio, H. R., Henley, T., & Thompson, C. B. (1997). The phenomenology of everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Popp-Baier, U. (1998). Das Heilige im Profanen. Religiöse Orientierungen im Alltag. Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  66. Popp-Baier, U. (2006). Zwischen Himmel und Erde: Kulturwissenschaftliche Überlegungen zur gegenwärtigen Religionspsychologie. Handlung Kultur Interpretation, 15, 132–149.Google Scholar
  67. Popp-Baier, U. (2008). Erfahrung, Identität, Religion. Zur psychologischen Analyse individueller Religiosität. Journal für Psychologie, 16(3). http://www.journal-fuer-psychologie.de/index.php/jfp/article/view/203/145. Zugegriffen am 10.04.2017.
  68. Popp-Baier, U. (2010). From religion to spirituality – Megatrend in contemporary society or methodological artefact? A contribution to the secularization debate from psychology of religion. Journal of Religion in Europe, 3(1), 34–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Popp-Baier, U. (2015). ‚Ich sehe den Rücken nun als einen Segen an‘: Krankheit, Religion und Heilung in lebensgeschichtlichen Erzählungen: eine religionspsychologische Analyse. In G. Klinkhammer & E. Tolksdorf (Hrsg.), Somatisierung des Religiösen: empirische Studien zum rezenten religiösen Heilungs- und Therapiemarkt (S. 161–197). Bremen: Universität Bremen.Google Scholar
  70. Rizutto, A.-M. (1979). The birth of the living God: A psychoanalytic study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Roxburgh, E. C., & Roe, C. A. (2013). „Say from whence you owe this strange intelligence“: Investigating explanatory systems of spiritualist mental mediumship using interpretative phenomenological analysis. International Journal of Transpersonal Studies, 32(1), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Roxburgh, E. C., & Roe, C. A. (2014). Reframing voices and visions using a spiritual model. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of anomalous experiences in mediumship. Mental Health, Religion & Culture, 17(6), 641–653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schachter, E. P. (2004). Identity configurations: A new perspective on identity formation in contemporary society. Journal of Personality, 72(1), 167–199.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  74. Schütze, F. (1983). Biographieforschung und narratives Interview. Neue Praxis, 13(3), 283–293.Google Scholar
  75. Shanon, B. (2002). The antipodes of the mind: Charting the phenomenology of the Ayahuasca experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Shepherd, C. (2013). A discursive psychology framework for the analysis of faith attribution in conversation. In H. Westerink (Hrsg.), Constructs of meaning and religious transformation. Current issues in the psychology of religion (S. 81–100). Göttingen: V&R unipress.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. Theory, method and research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  78. Sremac, S. (2013). Addiction and spiritual transformation. Münster: LIT.Google Scholar
  79. Starbuck, E. D. (1899). The psychology of religion: An empirical study of the growth of religious consciousness. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
  80. Staples, C. L., & Mauss, A. L. (1987). Conversion or commitment? A reassessment of the Snow and Machalek approach to the study of conversion. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 26, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stolz, J., Könemann, M., Schneuwly Purdie, M., Engelberger, T., & Krüggeler, M. (2014). Religion und Spiritualität in der Ich-Gesellschaft. Zürich: Theologischer Verlag Zürich.Google Scholar
  82. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  83. Streib, H., Hood, R. W., Keller, B., Csöff, R.-M., & Silver, C. F. (2009). Deconversion. Qualitative and quantitative results from cross-cultural research in Germany and the United States of America. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
  84. Sundén, H. (1966). Die Religion und die Rollen. Eine psychologische Untersuchung der Frömmigkeit. Berlin: Töpelmann.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wikström, O. (1993). The psychology of religion in Scandinavia. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 3, 47–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Williamson, P. W., Pollio, H. R., & Hood, R. W. (2000). A phenomenological analysis of the anointing among religious serpent handlers. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 10, 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wulff, D. M. (1995). Phenomenological psychology and religious experience. In R. W. Hood (Hrsg.), Handbook of religious experience (S. 183–199). Birmingham: Religious Education Press.Google Scholar
  88. Wulff, D. M. (1997). Psychology of religion. Classic and contemporary (2. Aufl.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  89. Wundt, W. (1911). Probleme der Völkerpsychologie. Leipzig: Wiegand.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geschiedenis, Europese studies en ReligiewetenschappenUniversiteit van AmsterdamAmsterdamNiederlande

Personalised recommendations