Advertisement

Standardisierung als innovationspolitisches Instrument

  • Knut BlindEmail author
Living reference work entry
  • 9 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag zeigt nach einem einleitenden Kapitel mit den wichtigsten Definitionen zunächst die verschiedenen innovationsfördernden Effekte von Standards auf. Anschließend werden die wichtigsten Markt- und Systemversagensgründe bezüglich Innovation vorgestellt und die Potenziale der Standardisierung zu deren Behebung herausgearbeitet. Abschließend werden Möglichkeiten aufgezeigt, das innovationsfördernde Potenzial der Standardisierung und von Standards noch weiter zu steigern.

Schlüsselwörter

Standardisierung Standards Innovation Marktversagen Systemversagen 

Literatur

  1. Baron, Justus, Tim Pohlmann, und Knut Blind. 2016. Essential patents and standard dynamics. Research Policy 45:1762–1773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Besen, Stanley M., und Joseph Farrell. 1994. Choosing how to compete: Strategies and tactics in standardization. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8:117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blind, Knut. 2004. The economics of standards: Theory, evidence and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  4. Blind, Knut. 2009. Standardisation: A catalyst for innovation. Inaugural address given at Rotterdam School of Management. Erasmus University, 28 August.Google Scholar
  5. Blind, Knut. 2012. The influence of regulations on innovation: A quantitative assessment for OECD countries. Research Policy 41:391–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blind, Knut. 2016. The impact of standardisation and standards on innovation. In Handbook of innovation policy impact, Hrsg. Jakob Edler, Paul Cunningham, Abdullah Gök und Philip Shapira, 423–449. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blind, Knut, und Stephan Gauch. 2007. Forscher profitieren von Normung: Normen sollten parallel zu den Forschungsprozessen erarbeitet werden. Wissenschaftsmanagement Special 2/2007: 16–17.Google Scholar
  8. Blind, Knut, und Stephan Gauch. 2008. Trends in ICT standards in European standardisation. Bodies and Standards Consortia. Telecommunications Policy 32(7): 503–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blind, Knut, und Stephan Gauch. 2009. Research and standardisation in nanotechnology: Evidence from Germany. The Journal of Technology Transfer 34(3): 320–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blind, Knut, und Axel Mangelsdorf. 2013. Alliance formation of SMEs: Empirical evidence from standardization committees. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 60(1): 148–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blind, Knut, und Axel Mangelsdorf. 2016. Motives to standardize: Empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation 48–49:13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blind, Knut, Stephan Gauch, und Richard Hawkins. 2010. How stakeholders assess the impacts of ICT standards. Telecommunications Policy 34(3): 162–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blind, Knut, Sören Petersen, und Cesare Riillo. 2017. The impact of standards and regulation on innovation in uncertain markets. Research Policy 46(1): 249–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Botzem, Sebastian, und Leonard Dobusch. 2012. Standardization cycles: A process perspective on the formation and diffusion of transnational standards. Organisation Studies 33:737–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Carlsson, Bo, und Staffan Jacobsson. 1997. In Search of useful public policies: Key lessons and issues for policy makers. In Technological systems and industrial dynamics, Hrsg. Bo Carlsson, 299–315. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. David, Paul A., und Shane Greenstein. 1990. The economics of compatibility standards: An introduction to recent research. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1(1–2): 3–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edler, Jakob, Luke Georghiou, Elvira Uyarra, und Knut Blind. 2012. Evaluating the demand side: New challenges for evaluation. Research Evaluation 21:33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. European Commission. 2007. A lead market initiative for Europe, COM 860 final. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  19. European Commission. 2011a. Horizon 2020 – The framework programme for research and innovation. COM 808 final. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  20. European Commission. 2011b. Proposal for a regulation of the European parliament and of the council establishing horizon 2020 – The framework programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020), COM(2011) 809 final. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission. 2011c. Proposal for a regulation of the european parliament and of the council laying down the rules for the participation and dissemination in ‚Horizon 2020‘ – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020), COM(2011) 810 final. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  22. European Commission. 2019. The European Green Deal, COM(2019) 640. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  23. Freeman, Christopher. 1987. Technology and economic performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Gauch, Stephan, und Knut Blind. 2015. Technological convergence and the absorptive capacity of standardisation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 91:236–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hekkert, Marko P., Roal Roald Suurs, Simona O. Negro, Stefan Kuhlmann, und Ruud E. Smits. 2007. Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74(4): 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lundvall, Bengt-Åke. 1992. National systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  27. Porter, Michael E., und Claas van der Linde. 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives 9(4): 97–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Robertson, Thomas S., und Hubert Gatignon. 1986. Competitive effects on technology diffusion. Journal of Marketing 50:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Swann, G. M. Peter. 2000. The economics of standardization. London: Department of Trade and Industry.Google Scholar
  30. Swann, G. M. Peter. 2010. The economics of standardization: An update. London: Department of Business, Innovation and Skills.Google Scholar
  31. Weitzel, Tim, Daniel Beimborn, und Wolfgang König. 2006. A unified economic model of standard diffusion: The impact of standardization cost, network effects, and network topology. MIS Quarterly 30:489–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wiegmann, Paul M., Henk J. De Vries, und Knut Blind. 2017. Multi-mode standardisation: A critical review and a research agenda. Research Policy 46:1370–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Technologie und ManagementTechnische Universität Berlin & Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und InnovationsforschungBerlinDeutschland

Personalised recommendations