Advertisement

Digitalisierte Gesellschaften

Soziologische und politiktheoretische Perspektiven
  • Heidrun FrieseEmail author
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer Reference Sozialwissenschaften book series (SRS)

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag thematisiert theoretische Perspektiven und Begrifflichkeiten, mit denen gesellschaftliche Dynamiken als (Post-)Moderne, Wissensgesellschaft, Informationsgesellschaft, postindustrielle Gesellschaft oder flüssige Moderne gefasst werden. Wie deutlich wird, haben digitale Praktiken Anteil an diesen Entwicklungen. Sie konstituieren Gemeinschaften und Subjekte, sie sind Teil von Regierungsformen, Macht, Ideologie, Ungleichheit und damit politischer und ökonomischer Entwicklungen in neoliberalen Zeiten.

Schlüsselwörter

Theorien der Moderne Gemeinschaft Subjekt Regierungsform Ungleichheit Neoliberalismus Digitale Praktiken 

Literatur

  1. Appadurai, Arjun. 1990. Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. In Modernity at large. Cultural dimensions of globalization, 27–47. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  2. Assmann, Aleida, und Heidrun Friese, Hrsg. 2000. Identitäten. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  3. Augé, Marc. 1992. Non-Lieux. Introduction à une anthropologie de la surmodernité. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  4. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2000. Liquid society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  5. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2001. The individualized society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2005. Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  7. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2006. Liquid fear. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  8. Bauman, Zygmunt. 2007. Liquid times. Living in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  9. Bauman, Zygmunt, und David Lyon. 2013. Liquid surveillance. A conversation. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Beck, Ulrich, Anthony Giddens, und Scott Lash. 1994. Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Beer, David. 2009. Power through the algorithm? Participatory web cultures and the technological unconscious. New Media & Society 11(6): 985–1002.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809336551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beer, David. 2013. Popular culture and new media: The politics of circulation. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Beer, David. 2016. Metric power. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beer, David, und Roger Burrows. 2007. Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some initial considerations. Sociological Research Online 12(5).  https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.1560. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html. Zugegriffen am 21.08.2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Beer, David, und Roger Burrows. 2010. Consumption, prosumption and participatory web cultures: An introduction. Journal of Consumer Culture 10(1): 3–12.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540509354009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bell, Daniel. 1973. The coming of post-industrial society. A venture in social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Bell, David, und Barbara M. Kennedy, Hrsg. 2000. The cybercultures reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Boltanski, Luc, und Ève Chiapello. 2003. Der neue Geist des Kapitalismus. Konstanz: UVK (orig. Le nouvel ésprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard, 1999).Google Scholar
  19. Brinkerhoff, Jennifer F. 2009. Digital diasporas. Identity and transnational engagement. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  21. Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Castells, Manuel. 2000. The rise of the network society. The information age: Economy, society and culture, Bd. 1, 2. Aufl. London/Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  23. Castells, Manuel. 2005. The network society. From knowledge to policy. In The network society. From knowledge to policy, Hrsg. Manuel Castells und Gustavo Cardoso, 3–21. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Center for Transatlantic Relations.Google Scholar
  24. Chadwick, Andrew, und Philip N. Howard, Hrsg. 2009. The Routledge handbook of internet politics. New York/Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Cooper, Rosalind. 2019. Pastoral power and algorithmic governmentality. Theory, Culture & Society, 31.07.2019.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419860576.
  26. Couldry, Nick. 2005. Media rituals: Beyond functionalism. In Media anthropology, Hrsg. Eric W. Rothenbuhler und Mihai Coman, 59–69. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Daniels, Jessie, Karen Gregory, und Tressie McMillan Cottom, Hrsg. 2016. Digital sociology in everyday life. Bristol: Bristol University Press/Policy Press.Google Scholar
  28. Daniels, Jessie, Apryl Williams, und Shantel Buggs. 2017. Digital media technologies in everyday life. Information, Communication & Society 20(7): 947–949.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1307435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Deleuze, Gilles, und Félix Guattari. 1976. Rhizome. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
  30. DiMaggio, Paul, Eszter Hargittai, W. Russell Neuman, und John P. Robinson. 2001. Social implications of the internet. Annual Review of Sociology 27(1): 307–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Drucker, Peter F. 1992 [1969]. The age of discontinuity: Guidelines to our changing society. New York: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  32. Dutton, William, Hrsg. 2013. Internet studies. The foundations of a transformative field. In The Oxford handbook of internet studies, 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0001.
  33. Elias, Ana Sofia, und Rosalind Gill. 2018. Beauty surveillance: The digital self-monitoring cultures of neoliberalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies 21(1): 59–77.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417705604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ellison, Nicole B., und Danah M. Boyd. 2013. Sociality through network sites. In The Oxford handbook of internet studies, Hrsg. William H. Dutton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199589074.013.0008.
  35. Featherstone, Mike. 2009. Ubiquitous media: An introduction. Theory, Culture & Society 26(2/3): 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409103104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Foucault, Michel. 1977. Überwachen und Strafen. Die Geburt des Gefängnisses. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp (orig. Surveiller et punir. La naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard, 1975).Google Scholar
  37. Foucault, Michel. 1988. Technologies of the self. In Technologies of the self – A seminar with Michel Foucault, Hrsg. Luther H. Martin, Huck Gutman und Patrick H. Hutton, 16–49. London: Travistock Publications.Google Scholar
  38. Foucault, Michel. 1989. Die Sorge um sich. Sexualität und Wahrheit, Bd. 3. Übers. Ulrich Raulff und Walter Seitter. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp (orig. Histoire de la sexualité 3, Le souci de soi. Paris: Gallimard, 1984).Google Scholar
  39. Foucault, Michel. 2009. Die Regierung des Selbst und der anderen. Vorlesungen am Collège de France 1982/83. Übers. Jürgen Schröder. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  40. Friese, Heidrun. 2005. Cultural identities. In Handbook of contemporary European social theory, Hrsg. Gerard Delanty, 298–310. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Fuchs, Christian. 2008. Internet and society: Social theory in the information age. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Fuchs, Christian. 2018a. Digitale Demagogie: Autoritärer Kapitalismus in Zeiten von Trump und Twitter. Hamburg: VSA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fuchs, Christian. 2018b. Socialising anti-social social media. In Anti-social media: The impact on journalism and society, Hrsg. John Mair, Tor Clark, Neil Fowler, Raimond Snoody und Richard Tait, 58–63. Suffolk: Abramis Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
  44. Fuchs, Christian. 2019. Karl Marx in the age of big data capitalism. In Digital objects, digital subjects: Interdisciplinary perspectives on capitalism, labour and politics in the age of big data, Hrsg. David Chandler und Christian Fuchs, 53–71. London: University of Westminster Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Fuchs, Christian, und David Chandler. 2019. Introduction: Big data capitalism – Politics, activism, and theory. In Digital objects, digital subjects: Interdisciplinary perspectives on capitalism, labour and politics in the age of big data, 1–20. London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar
  46. Fuchs, Christian, und Nick Dyer-Witheford. 2013. Karl Marx @ Internet studies. New Media & Society 15(5): 782–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Fuchs, Christian, und Marison Sandoval, Hrsg. 2013. Critique, social media and the information society. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Garnham, Nicholas. 2004. Information society theory as ideology. In The information society reader, Hrsg. Frank Webster, 165–184. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Goriunova, Olga. 2016. The digital subject: People as data as persons. Theory, Culture & Society bitte einfügen: 16.04.2019.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419840409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Heidenreich, Martin. 2003. Die Debatte um die Wissensgesellschaft. In Wissenschaft in der Wissensgesellschaft, Hrsg. Stefan Böschen und Ingo Schulz-Schaeffer. Wiesbaden: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-07783-1_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Horkheimer, Max, und Theodor W. Adorno. 1997 [1947]. Kulturindustrie. Aufklärung als Massenbetrug. In Dialektik der Aufklärung. Philosophische Fragmente. Gesammelte Schriften, Hrsg. Rolf Tiedemann, Bd. 3, 141–191. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  52. Howard, Philip N. 2004. Embedded media: Who we know, what we know, and society online. In Society online, Hrsg. Philip N. Howard und Steven G. Jones, 1–27. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Howard, Philip N., und Steven G. Jones, Hrsg. 2004. Society online. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  54. Hunger, Uwe, und Kathrin Kisau, Hrsg. 2009. Internet und Migration. Theoretische Zugänge und empirische Befunde. Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Ignatow, Gabe. 2017. Information capitalism. In The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of globalization, Hrsg. George Ritzer. London: Blackwell.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470670590.wbeog299.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ignatow, Gabe, und Laura Robinson. 2017. Pierre Bourdieu: Theorizing the digital. Information, Communication & Society 20(7): 950–966.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. John, Nicholas A. 2013. Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media & Society 15(2): 167–182.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812450684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kollock, Peter, und Marc Smith, Hrsg. 1999. Communities in cyberspace. In Communities in cyberspace, 3–25. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  59. Lanier, Jaron. 2018. Ten arguments for deleting your social media accounts right now. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  60. Lash, Scott. 2002. Critique of information. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  61. Lash, Scott. 2006. Dialectic of information? A response to Taylor. Information, Community & Society 9(5): 572–581.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180600965542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lash, Scott. 2007. Power after hegemony: Cultural studies in mutation? Theory, Culture & Society 2(3): 55–78.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407075956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Lievrouw, Leah A., und Sonia Livingstone, Hrsg. 2000. Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Lupton, Deborah. 2015. Digital sociology. Milton Park/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  65. Lyon, David. 1994. The electronic eye. The rise of surveillance society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  66. Lyon, David. 2001. Surveillance society. Monitoring everyday life. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Lyon, David. 2010. Liquid surveillance: The contribution of Zygmunt Bauman to surveillance studies. International Political Sociology 4:325–338.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2010.00109.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984. The postmodern condition. A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Maasen, Sabine. 2006. Wissensgesellschaft. In Soziologische Basics, Hrsg. Albert Scherr. Wiesbaden: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90237-1_31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Machlup, Fritz. 1962. The production and distribution of knowledge in the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Mannheim, Karl. 1952. Essays on the sociology of knowledge, Hrsg. Paul Kecskemeti. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  72. Marres, Noortje. 2017. Digital sociology: The reinvention of social research. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  73. Marwick, Alice E. 2012. The public domain: Social surveillance in everyday life. Surveillance & Society 9(4): 378–393. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/. Zugegriffen am 20.08.2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Orton-Johnson, Kate, und Nick Prior, Hrsg. 2013. Digital sociology: Critical perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  75. Rheingold, Howard. 2000. The virtual community: Homesteading on the electronic frontier. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Rheingold, Howard. 2008. Using participatory media and public voice to encourage civic engagement. In Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. MacArthur Foundation series on digital media and learning, Hrsg. W. Lance Bennett, 97–118. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.  https://doi.org/10.1162/dmal.9780262524827.097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Romele, Alberto, und Marta Severo. 2016. The economy of the digital gift: From socialism to sociality online. Theory, Culture & Society 33(5): 43–63.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415619474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Rothenbuhler, Eric W., und Mihai Coman, Hrsg. 2005. The promise of media anthropology. In Media anthropology, 1–11. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  79. Sauter, Theresa. 2013. „What’s on your mind?“ Writing on Facebook as a tool for self-formation. New Media & Society 16(5): 823–839.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813495160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sekloča, Peter. 2019. The centre and the periphery: Productivity and the global networked public sphere. tripleC 17(1): 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Slevin, James W. 2000. The Internet and society. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  82. Slevin, James M. 2002. The Internet and society: Central themes and issues. In The Internet and society? Questioning answers and answering questions. Papers from the Centre for Internet Research Aarhus, Hrsg. Niels Brügger und Henrik Bødker, 7–13. http://cfi.au.dk/fileadmin/www.cfi.au.dk/publikationer/cfis_skriftserie/005_brugger_boedker.pdf. Zugegriffen am 20.08.2019.
  83. Slevin, James M. 2007. Internet. In The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology, Hrsg. George Ritzer, 2384–2388. Oxford: Wiley/Blackwell.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeosi061.pub2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stehr, Nico. 1994. Arbeit, Eigentum und Wissen. Zur Theorie von Wissensgesellschaften. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  85. Stehr, Nico. 2002. Knowledge and economic conduct. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Stehr, Nico, und Marian Adolf. 2015. Ist Wissen Macht? Erkenntnisse über Wissen. Weilerswist: Velbrück Wissenschaft.Google Scholar
  87. Thompson, John. 1990. Ideology and modern culture. Critical social theory in the era of mass communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  88. Thompson, John. 1995. Media and modernity. A theory of the media. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  89. Thrift, Nigel. 2005. Knowing capitalism. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  90. Thrift, Nigel. 2006. Re-inventing invention: New tendencies in capitalist commodification. Economy and Society 35(2): 279–306.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140600635755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Touraine, Alain. 1971. The post-industrial society. Tomorrow’s social history: Classes, conflicts and culture in the programmed society. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  92. Touraine, Alain. 1988. Return of the actor. Social theory in postindustrial society. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  93. Wacquant, Loïc. 2006. Pierre Bourdieu. In Key contemporary thinkers, Hrsg. Rob Stones, 261–277. London/New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  94. Ward, Stephen, und Rachel Gibson. 2009. European political organizations and the Internet. Mobilization, participation, and change. In The Routledge handbook of Internet politics, Hrsg. Andrew Chadwick und Philip N. Howard, 25–39. New York/Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
  95. Webster, Frank. 2002a. The information society revisited. In Handbook of new media: Social shaping and consequences of ICTs, Hrsg. Leah A. Lievrouw und Sonia Livingstone, 255–266. London: Sage.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608245.n3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Webster, Frank. 2002b. Theories of the information society. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Webster, Frank, Hrsg. 2004. The information society reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. West, Emily. 2019. Amazon: Surveillance as a service. Surveillance & Society 17(1/2): 27–33. https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/index. Zugegriffen am 20.08.2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut für Germanistik und Interkulturelle KommunikationTechnische Universität ChemnitzChemnitzDeutschland

Personalised recommendations