Advertisement

Using B-Spline Expansions for Ionosphere Modeling

  • Michael Schmidt
  • Denise Dettmering
  • Florian Seitz
Reference work entry

Abstract

The knowledge of the electron density is the key point in correcting electromagnetic measurements for ionospheric disturbances. In the last 15 years, the space-geodetic observation techniques such as the Global Positioning System (GPS) or radar altimetry have become a promising tool for monitoring the electron distribution in the ionosphere.This chapter gives a detailed overview of the mathematical modeling of ionospheric parameters such as the electron density by means of B-spline expansions. B-splines – which are locally supported basis functions – allow for optimal handling of unevenly distributed observations and data gaps. By combining the one-dimensional basis functions by means of tensor products, multidimensional models can be constructed easily. The unknown model coefficients are estimated based on observations from a number of space-geodetic techniques. In addition to the mathematical model and the basis functions used, the estimation process including variance component estimation (VCE) and multi-scale representation (MSR) is introduced. The feasibility of the approach is shown for one example modeling the vertical total electron content (VTEC) for 24 h in South America.

References

  1. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2011) Guide to reference and standard ionosphere models. AIAA, Reston. ISBN:1-56347-347-XGoogle Scholar
  2. Aragón-Angel A, Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J (2009) Obtaining more accurate density profiles from bending angle with GPS occultation data: FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC constellation. Adv Space Res 43(11):1694–1701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azpilicueta F, Brunini C, Radicella SM (2006) Global ionospheric maps from GPS observations using modip latitude. J Adv Space Res 38:2324–2331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bányai L (1997) Investigation of the single layer model of GPS ionospheric data processing using IRI-90 and the attached diffusive equilibrium model of plasmaspheric electron density. Ann Geophys 40(6):1471–1482. doi:10.4401/ag-3837Google Scholar
  5. Bassiri S, Hajj GA (1993) Higher-order ionopsheric effects on the global positioning system observables and means of modeling them. Manuscr Geodetica 18:280–289Google Scholar
  6. Bayer M, Freeden W, Maier T (2001) A vector wavelet approach in iono- and magnetospheric geomagnetic satellite data. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 63:581–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bilitza D, Reinisch B (2008) International reference ionosphere 2007: improvements and new parameters. Adv Space Res 42:599–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brunini C, Sánchez L (2013) Geodetic reference frame for the Americas. GIM Int 27(3):26–31Google Scholar
  9. Davies K (1990) Ionospheric radio. Peter Peregrinus, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dettmering D (2003) The use of GPS for three-dimensional ionosphere modelling (in German). PhD thesis, Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatic, University of Stuttgart, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  11. Dettmering D, Schmidt M, Heinkelmann R (2011a) Systematic differences between VTEC obtained by different space-geodetic techniques during CONT08. J Geod 85:443–451. doi:10.1007/s00190-011-0473-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dettmering D, Schmidt M, Heinkelmann R, Seitz M (2011b) Combination of different space-geodetic observations for regional ionosphere modeling. J Geod 85:989–998. doi:10.1007/s00190-010-0423-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dettmering D, Schmidt M, Limberger M (2013) Contributions of DORIS to ionosphere modeling. In: Proceedings of “20 years of Progress in Radar Altimetry”, IDS Workshop, Sept 2012, Venice, ESA SP-710, ESA/ESTECGoogle Scholar
  14. Dow JM, Neilan RE, Rizos C (2009) The international GNSS service in a changing landscape of Global navigation satellite systems. J Geod 83:191–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fong C-J, Yen NL, Chu C-H, Yang S-K, Shiau W-T, Huang C-Y, Chi S, Chen S-S, Liou Y-A, Kuo Y-H (2009) FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC spacecraft constellation system, mission results, and prospect for follow-on mission. Terr Atmos Ocean Sci 20:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeden W, Gerhards C (2010) Poloidal and toroidal modeling in terms of locally supported vector wavelets. Math Geosci 42:817–838MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeden W, Gerhards C (2013) Geomathematically oriented potential theory. Taylor and Francis, Boca RatonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. Geese A (2010) Earth’s magnetic field: observation and modelling from global to regional scales. Scientific technical report STR11/03, GFZ Potsdam, doi:10.2312/GFZ.b103-11036Google Scholar
  19. Heise S (2002) Reconstruction of three-dimensional electron density distributions based on CHAMP GPS measurements (in German). PhD thesis, Institute for Meteorology, FU Berlin, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J, Orus R, Garcia-Rigo A, Feltens J, Komjathy A, Schaer SC, Krankowski A (2009) The IGS VTEC map: a reliable source of ionospheric information since 1998. J Geod 83(3–4):263–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hernández-Pajares M, Juan JM, Sanz J, Aragón-Angel A, Garcia-Rigo A, Salazar D, Escudero M (2011) The ionosphere: effects, GPS modeling and the benefits for space geodetic techniques. J Geod 85:887–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Heublein M (2011) Three-dimensional B-Spline models of VTEC from the combination of different geodetic observation methods. Bachelor thesis, Faculty of Geodesy and Geoinformation, Karlsruher Insitut für Technologie KITGoogle Scholar
  23. Hong L, Chen G, Chui CK (1998) A filter-bank-based Kalman filtering technique for wavelet estimation and decomposition of random signals. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst 45(2):237–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Iijima BA, Harris IL, Ho CM, Lindqwister UJ, Mannucci AJ, Pi X, Reyes MJ, Sparks LC, Wilson BD (1999) Automated daily process for global ionospheric total electron content maps and satellite ocean ionospheric calibration based on Global positioning system. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 61(16):1205–1218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jekeli C (2005) Spline representations of functions on a sphere for geophysical modeling. Geodetic and Geoinformation Science, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science, The Ohio State University, Report No. 475, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  26. Koch KR (1999) Parameter estimation and hypothesis testing in linear models. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Koch KR (2007) Introduction to Bayesian statistics. Springer, BerlinzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Koch KR (2009) Identity of simultaneous estimates of control points and of their estimates by the lofting method for NURBS surface fitting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-009-1934-xGoogle Scholar
  29. Koch KR (2011a) Data compression by multi-scale representation of signals. J Appl Geod 5:1–12. doi:10.1515/JAG.2011.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Koch KR (2011b) Thresholds for data compression by multi-scale representation of signals. Allgemeine Vermessungs-Nachrichten 118:293–301Google Scholar
  31. Koch KR, Kusche J (2002) Regularization of geopotential determination from satellite data by variance components. J Geod 76:259–268. doi:10.1007s00190-002-0245-xCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. Koch KR, Schmidt M (2011) Identity of simultaneous estimates of control points and of their estimates by the lofting method for NURBS surface fitting. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-009-1934-xGoogle Scholar
  33. Langley RB (1998) Propagation of the GPS signals. In: Teunissen PJG, Kleusberg A (eds) GPS for geodesy. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  34. Limberger M, Schmidt M, Dettmering D, Liang W, Hugentobler U (2013) Determination of F2 Chapman parameters by means of electron density profiles for regional ionosphere modeling. Ann Geophys 31(12):2215–2227. European Geoscience UnionCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lyche T, Schumaker LL (2001) A multiresolution tensor spline method for fitting functions on the sphere. SIAM J Sci Comput 22(2):724–746MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Maier T (2005) Wavelet Mie-representations for solenoidal vector fields with applications to ionosperic magnetic modeling. SIAM J Appl Math 65:1888–1912MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Mayer C (2004) Wavelet modelling of the spherical inverse spource problem with application to geomagnetism. Inverse Probl 20:1713–1728CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. Mößmer M (2009) Globale drei-dimensionale Ionosphärenmodelle des VTEC (in German). Bachelor’s thesis, Technical University MunichGoogle Scholar
  39. Ogden RT (1997) Essential wavelets for statistical applications and data analysis. Birkhäuser, BostonCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Radicella SM (2009) The NeQuick model genesis, uses and evolution. Ann Geophys 52(3): 417–422Google Scholar
  41. Schaer S (1999) Mapping and predicting the Earth’s ionosphere using the Global positioning system. Ph.D. dissertation, Astronomical Institute, University of Berne, BerneGoogle Scholar
  42. Schmidt M (2007) Wavelet modeling in support of IRI. Adv Space Res 39:932–940CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schmidt M (2012) Towards a multi-scale representation of multi-dimensional signals. In: Sneeuw N et al (eds) VII Hotine-Marussi symposium on mathematical geodesy, Rome. IGA symposia, vol 137, pp 119-127. doi:10.1007978-3-642-22078-4_18Google Scholar
  44. Schmidt M, Dettmering D, Mößmer M, Wang Y, Zang J (2011) Comparison of spherical harmonic and B spline models for the vertical electron content. Radio Sci 46:RS0D11. doi:10.1029/2010RS004609Google Scholar
  45. Schmidt M, Göttl F, Heinkelmann R (2013) Towards the combination of data sets from various observation techniques. In: Proceedings of the 1st international workshop on the quality of geodetic observation and monitoring system (QuGOMS) 2011, MunichGoogle Scholar
  46. Schumaker LL, Traas C (1991) Fitting scattered data on spherelike surfaces using tensor products of trigonometric and polynomial splines. Numer Math 60:133–144MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. Schunk RW, Nagy AF (2000) Ionospheres: physics, plasma physics, and chemistry. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schunk RW et al (2004) Global assimilation of ionospheric measurements (GAIM). Radio Sci 39. doi:10.1029/2002RS002794Google Scholar
  49. Seeber G (2003) Satellite geodesy. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York. ISBN:978-3110175493Google Scholar
  50. Stollnitz EJ, DeRose TD, Salesin DH (1995) Wavelets for computer graphics: a primer, part I. IEEE Comput Graphics Appl 15(3):76–84; part II, IEEE Comput Graphics Appl 15(4):75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Willis P, Fagard H, Ferrage P, Lemoine FG, Noll CE, Noomen R, Otten M, Ries JC, Rothacher M, Soudarin L, Tavernier G, Valette JJ (2012) The international DORIS service (IDS): toward maturity. Adv Space Res 45(12):1408–1420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zeilhofer C (2008) Multi-dimensional B-spline modeling of spatio-temporal ionospheric signals. German Geodetic Commission, Series A, 123, MunichGoogle Scholar
  53. Zeilhofer C, Schmidt M, Bilitza D, Shum CK (2009) Regional 4-D modeling of the ionospheric electron density from satellite data and IRI. Adv Space Res 43:1669–1675CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Schmidt
    • 1
  • Denise Dettmering
    • 1
  • Florian Seitz
    • 1
  1. 1.Deutsches Geodätisches ForschungsinstitutMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations