Service-Learning Application in an M-Learning Course

  • Margaret Sass
Reference work entry


With the increasing popularity of smartphones, tablets, and laptops among college students, higher education institutions are beginning to implement these devices into the college curriculum. The academic community has realized that using mobile devices may encourage and increase academic intelligence. This troika relationship between the student, the mobile device, and the course is a form of m-learning, a method of teaching that is being practiced more and more throughout national and international campuses. Sharples et al. (Mobile learning. Springer, pp 233–249, 2009) state that “exploration is essentially mobile in that it either involves physical movement or movement through conceptual space, linking experiences and concepts into new knowledge” (p. 4). Education should be exploratory to the student, kindling a desire to learn more and do more.

This chapter examines the pedagogy behind m-learning and discusses the relationship of m-learning with service-learning curriculum. The challenges of m-learning are discussed, as well as the ways to successfully implement social media tools into the college classroom that includes a service-learning project or focus. This discussion’s purpose is to encourage instructors to consider using a form of m-learning in the classroom in collaboration with service learning as a way to engage the student in a familiar platform.


Mobile Device Social Presence Service Learning Social Media Site Technology Enhance Learning 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Antonenko, P. 2015. The instrumental value of conceptual in educational technology research frameworks. Educational Technology Research and Development 63(1): 53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bassa, Avishay. June 4, 2013. Emaze: Nextgen presentation platform. Geektime. Accessed 3 Feb 2014.
  3. Bringle, R.G., and J.A. Hatcher. 1996. Implementing service learning in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education 67: 221–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryant, J., and A. Bates. 2015. Creating a constructivist online instructional environment. TechTrends 59(2): 17–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chareonlarp, E. March 7, 2012. The networked media in the fragmented world. IDG Global Solutions. Accessed 29 Dec 2014.
  6. Clifton, A., and C. Mann. 2011. Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning? Nurse Education Today 31(4): 311–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corbeil, J.R., and M.E. Valdes-Corbeil. 2007. Are you ready for mobile learning? Educause Quarterly 30(2): 51.Google Scholar
  8. Dewey, J., and A.W. Small. 1897. My pedagogic creed (No. 25). New York: EL Kellogg & Company.Google Scholar
  9. Dunlap, J. C., and P. R. Lowenthal. 2014. The power of presence: Our quest for the right mix of social presence in online courses. In A.P. Mizell & A. A. Piña (Eds.) Real life distance education: Case studies in practice (pp. 41–66). Greenwhich, CT: Information Age PublishingGoogle Scholar
  10. Duran, R.L. 1983. Communicative adaptability: A measure of social communicative competence. Communication Quarterly 31(4): 320–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duran, R.L., and L. Kelly. 1988. An investigation into the cognitive domain of competence II: The relationship between communicative competence and interaction involvement. Communication Research Reports 5(1): 91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferdig, R.E., and K.D. Trammell. 2004. Content delivery in the ‘blogosphere’. The Journal 31(7): 12–20.Google Scholar
  13. Fontichiaro, K., and A. Elkordy. 2014. From starts to constellations: Digital badges can chart growth. Learning and Leading with Technology 41(4): 13–15.Google Scholar
  14. Fox, S., K. Zickuhr, and A. Smith. 2009. Twitter and status updating, fall 2009. Pew Internet & American Life Project, 21 Oct 2009.Google Scholar
  15. Heikkilä, A. 2006. Studying in higher education: Students’ approaches to learning, self-regulation, and cognitive strategies. StudieIn Higher Education 31(1): 99–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hullman, G.A. 2007. Communicative adaptability scale: Evaluating its use as an ‘other-report’ measure. Communication Reports 20(2): 51–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Instagram. 2014. Instagram Press. Accessed 31 Jan 2015.
  18. Junco, R., G. Heiberger, and E. Loken. 2011. The effect of Twitter on college student engagement and grades. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 27(2): 119–132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00387.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kaye, Cathryn Berger. 2004. The complete guide to service learning. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Kelly, M., C. Lyng, M. McGrath, and G. Cannon. 2009. A multi-method study to determine the effectiveness of, and student attitudes to, online instructional videos for teaching clinical nursing skills. Nurse Education Today 29(3): 292–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development, vol. 1. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  22. MoLeNET. 2014. Molenet. Accessed 10 May 2014.
  23. Sharples, M., I. Arnedillo-Sánchez, M. Milrad, and G. Vavoula. (2009). Mobile learning, 233–249. Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  24. Shudgon, W., and M. Higgins. 2006. Limitations of mobile phone learning. The Jalt Call Journal 2(1): 3–14.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, Craig. 2015. Bu the numbers: 35+ amazing snapchat statistics. DMR. Accessed 3 Feb 2015.
  26. Snelson, C. 2011. YouTube across the disciplines: A review of the literature. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching.Google Scholar
  27. Sopho, Monthira. 2014. Using snapchat as a higher education tool. Multimedia Portfolio. Accessed 3 Feb 2015.
  28. Thakore, H., and T. McMahon. 2006. Virtually there: E-learning in medical education. The Clinical Teacher 3(4): 225–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Twitter Press. 2014. About. Accessed 15 Dec 2014.
  30. University of Sheffield. 2014. Learning and teaching services. Accessed 24 Dec 2014.
  31. Wheeless, V.E., and R.L. Duran. 1982. Gender orientation as a correlate of communicative competence. Southern Speech Communication Journal 48(1): 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams, J.B., and J. Jacobs. 2014. Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in the higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 20(2): 232–247.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center of Instructional ExcellencePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations