Advertisement

The Graduation Game: Leveraging Mobile Technologies to Reimagine Academic Advising in Higher Education

  • Tressa M. HaderlieEmail author
  • Apoorva Chauhan
  • Whitney Lewis
  • Breanne K. Litts
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Using the augmented reality features of a mobile game development platform, ARIS, the Utah State University’s psychology department designed a mobile application called The Graduation Game (TGG). TGG addresses issues with current student advising procedures and aims to make advising information and resources more readily available to students. The game seeks to provide an earlier and more meaningful connection between incoming students and their academic advisors and the institution. This chapter discusses the iterative development cycle of TGG describing a series of game design and play testing over the period of 8 months. We conclude with the affordances and constraints of TGG, lessons learned from using a game design approach for academic advising, and implications for leveraging mobile technologies to improve students’ advising experiences.

Keywords

Student orientation Mobile apps Mobile learning Player testing ARIS 

References

  1. Bressler, Denise. 2014. Better than business-as-usual: Improving scientific practices during discourse and writing by playing a collaborative mystery game. Double Helix: A Journal of Critical Thinking and Writing in the STEM Disciplines 2: 1–13 http://qudoublehelixjournal.org/index.php/dh/issue/view/2/showToc.Google Scholar
  2. Bressler, Denise M., and Alec M. Bodzin. 2016. Investigating flow experience and scientific practices during a Mobile serious educational game. Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (5): 795–805.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9639-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, John Seely, Allan Collins, and Paul Duguid. 1989. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher 18 (1): 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carlstrom, A., and M.A. Miller. 2013. NACADA national survey of academic advising (Monograph no. 25). Manhattan: National Academic Advising Association.Google Scholar
  5. Dikkers, Seann, John Martin, and Bob Coulter. 2012. Mobile media learning: Amazing uses of mobile devices for learning. Lexington: lulu.com.Google Scholar
  6. Elizabeth, Harrison. 2009. (Re)visiting academic advising : Nurse educator. LWW, Nurse Educator 34 (2): 64–68.  https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e31819907ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gee, James Paul. 2004. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Gonzalez, Virgilio Ernesto, and Oscar Antonio Perez. 2015. Work-in-progress: Student dashboard for a multi-agent approach for academic advising. In Seattle, Washington. https://peer.asee.org/work-in-progress-student-dashboard-for-a-multi-agent-approach-for-academic-advising.
  9. Gottlieb, Owen. 2016. Who really said what? Mobile historical situated documentary as liminal learning space. Gamevironments 5: 237–257.Google Scholar
  10. Heyman, Errin. 2010. Overcoming student retention issues in higher education online programs. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration 13 (4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ918571.
  11. Holden, C.L., and J.M. Sykes. 2012. Leveraging mobile games for place-based language learning. In Developments in current game-based learning design and deployment, ed. P. Felicia, 27–45. Hershey: IGI Global.Google Scholar
  12. Holden, Christopher L., David J. Gagnon, Breanne K. Litts, and Garrett Smith. 2014. ARIS: An open-source platform for widespread Mobile augmented reality experimentation. In Technology platform innovations and forthcoming trends in ubiquitous learning, 19–34. IGI Global: Hershey https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/aris/92932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holden, Christopher, Seann Dikkers, John Martin, and Breanne Litts, eds. 2015. Mobile media learning: Innovation and inspiration. Pittsburgh: ETC Press http://press.etc.cmu.edu/content/mobile-media-learning-innovation-and-inspiration.Google Scholar
  14. Lave, Jean, and Etienne Wenger. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press https://books.google.com/books/about/Situated_Learning.html?id=CAVIOrW3vYAC.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mathews, James M., and Kurt Squire. 2009. Augmented reality gaming and game design as a new literacy practice. In Media literacy: New agendas in communication, 209–232 Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Muraskin, Lana, and John Lee. 2004. Raising the graduation rates of low-income college students. Washington, DC: Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED490856.Google Scholar
  17. Norman, Don. 2013. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and expanded edition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  18. Pasquini, L. A., and Steele, G. E. (2016). Technology in academic advising: Perceptions and practices in higher education. NACADA Technology in Advising Commission Sponsored Survey 2013.Google Scholar
  19. Spencer, Robert W., E.D. Peterson, and G.L. Kramer. 1983. Designing and implementing a computer-assisted academic advisement program. Journal of College Student Personnel 24 (6): 513–518.Google Scholar
  20. Squire, Kurt. 2006. From content to context: Videogames as designed experience. Educational Researcher 35 (8): 19–29.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035008019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Squire, Kurt. 2011. Video games and learning: Teaching and participatory culture in the digital age. Technology, education--connections. New York: Teachers College Press https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED523599.Google Scholar
  22. Steele, George. 2016. Technology and academic advising. In Beyond foundations: Developing as a master academic advisor, 305–326. Hoboken: Jossey-Bass http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1118922891.html.Google Scholar
  23. Traxler, John. 2011. Learning in a mobile age, a more and more mobile age, 15–27.  https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-481-3.ch002.
  24. Vianden, Jörg, and Patrick J. Barlow. 2015. Strengthen the bond: Relationships between academic advising quality and undergraduate student loyalty. NACADA Journal 35 (2): 15–27.  https://doi.org/10.12930/NACADA-15-026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wagler, Mark, and Jim Mathews. 2012. Up river: Place, ethnography, and design in the St. Louis River estuary. In Mobile media learning. Pittsburgh: ETC Press http://press.etc.cmu.edu/content/river-place-ethnography-and-design-st-louis-river-estuary.Google Scholar
  26. Wehrs, William E. 1992. Using an expert system to support academic advising. Journal of Research on Computing in Education 24 (4): 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tressa M. Haderlie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Apoorva Chauhan
    • 2
  • Whitney Lewis
    • 3
  • Breanne K. Litts
    • 3
  1. 1.The Department of PsychologyUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  3. 3.Instructional Teaching and Learning Sciences departmentUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Rob Power
    • 1
  1. 1.Athabasca UniversityVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations