Advertisement

M-Learning and U-Learning Environments to Enhance EFL Communicative Competence

  • Soraya Garcia-SanchezEmail author
  • Carmen Lujan-Garcia
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Abstract

Today mobile learning and ubiquitous learning are hand in hand when planning higher education courses. On the one hand, m-learning implies that learners have access to digital information by using any mobile device such as their tablets or smartphones. On the other hand, u-learning suggests that the walls of the traditional classroom are extended to more open spaces that facilitate not only the access to information but also to participation anywhere and at any time. Moreover, tasks can be designed having in mind either an individual or cooperative learning approach, in which the interaction between learners is the key to succeed in their learning process. U-learning activities such as online glossaries, discussion forums, and interactive digital exercises allow today’s English as a foreign language (EFL) student to effectively enhance and perform their communicative language competence in the foreign language. Thanks to technology, current higher education students can improve the key skills of a foreign language (use of English, vocabulary, reading, listening, writing, and even speaking with other participants) using mobile devices and a u-learning approach. This chapter aims to demonstrate the work EFL tertiary learners have produced by using both m-learning and u-learning environments. The outcomes reveal that the communicative competence and the foreign language skills are being improved by using the appropriate technology, content, and tasks that are especially adapted to today’s digital students.

Keywords

Communicative competence EFL Interaction M-learning U-learning 

References

  1. Abachi, Hamid R., and Ghulam Muhammad. 2014. The impact of m-learning technology on students and educators. Computers in Human Behavior 30: 491–496.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.06.018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abu-Al-Aish, Ahmad, and Steve Love. 2013. Factors influencing students’ acceptance of m-learning: An investigation in higher education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 14 (5): 82–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aljohani, NaifRadi, Hugh C. Davis, and Seng W. Loke. 2012. A comparison between mobile and ubiquitous learning from the perspective of human-computer interaction. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organization 6 (3–4): 218–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anshari, Muhammad, et al. 2017. Smartphones usage in the classrooms. Learning aid or interference? Education and Information Technologies 22 (6): 3063–3079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Banerjee, Kamalika. 2018. How to incorporate open educational resources (OER) into the infrastructure and pedagogy for promoting ubiquitous learning. In Innovations in open and flexible education, 177–184. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bergmann, Jonathan, and Aaron Sams. 2012. Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene: ISTE.Google Scholar
  7. Bomsdorf, B. 2005. Adaptation of learning spaces: Supporting ubiquitous learning in higher distance education. In Mobile Computing and Ambient Intelligence, Germany.Google Scholar
  8. Burbules, Nicholas C. 2012. El aprendizaje ubicuo y el futuro de la enseñanza. Encounters 13: 3–14.Google Scholar
  9. Canale, Michael, and Merrill Swain. 1980. Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics 1: 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Castillo, Sergio, and Gerardo Ayala. 2012. Mobile learning. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, ed. Norbert M. Seel, 2293–2295. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, Da-Ren, Mu-Yen Chen, Tien-Chi Huang, and Weng-Pao Hsu. 2013. Developing a mobile learning system in augmented reality context. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks 2013: 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/594627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cope, Bill, and Mary Kalantzis, eds. 2010. Ubiquitous learning: Exploring the anywhere/anytime possibilities for learning in the age of digital media. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
  13. Dörnyei, Zoltán. 1997. Psychological processes in cooperative language learning: Group dynamics and motivation. The Modern Language Journal 81: 482–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dörnyei, Zoltán. 2001. Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. García-Sánchez, Soraya. 2012. English in class and on the go: Multimodal u-learning. The Eurocall Review 20 (2): 94–102.Google Scholar
  16. García-Sánchez, Soraya. 2014. Knowledge creation and digital collaboration in higher education. In Collaborative learning: Theory, strategies and educational benefits, ed. Stephen Rutherford, 1–14. New York: Nova.Google Scholar
  17. García-Sánchez, Soraya. 2017. Collaborative ubiquitous learning: A 21st-century approach to (in)formal scenarios. In Informal learning: Perspectives, challenges and opportunities, ed. Stephen Rutherford, 57–71. New York: Nova.Google Scholar
  18. García-Sánchez, Soraya, and Nicholas C. Burbules. 2017. A revision of activity theory to foster communicative 21st century skills. The International Journal of Learning: Annual Review 24 (1): 1–12.Google Scholar
  19. García-Sánchez, Soraya, and Carmen Luján-García. 2016. Ubiquitous knowledge and experiences to foster EFL learning affordances. Computer Assisted Language Learning Journal 29 (7): 1169–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Graf, Sabine, and Kinshuk. 2012. Personalized learning systems. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, ed. Norbert Seel, 878. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Guerra-Artal, Cayetano, Soraya García-Sánchez, and María Dolores Afonso-Suárez. 2012. Picasst: An innovative web-based tool for recording classes. Ubiquitous Learning: An International Journal 4 (3): 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huiping, Ning, and Garry Hornby. 2014. The impact of cooperative learning on tertiary EFL learners’ motivation. Educational Review 66 (1): 108–124.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.853169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kalantzis, Mary, and Bill Cope. 2012. New learning: Elements of a science of education. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kim, ChanHin, and Reinhard Pekrun. 2014. Emotions and motivation in learning and performance. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, ed. J. Michael Spector, M. David Merrill, Jan Elen, and M.J. Bishop, 65–75. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim, Eunice, Jhih-Syuan Lin, and Yongjun Sung. 2013. To app or not to app: Engaging consumers via branded mobile apps. Journal of Interactive Advertising 13 (1): 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu, Gi-Zen, and Gwo-Jen Hwang. 2010. A key step to understanding paradigm shifts in e-learning: Towards context-aware ubiquitous learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 41 (2): E1–E9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00976.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luján-García, Carmen. 2011. The impact of English on Spanish daily life and some pedagogical implications. Nordic Journal of English Studies 11 (1): 1–21.Google Scholar
  28. Luján-García, Carmen, and Soraya García-Sánchez. 2012. M-learning: Transforming present education and designing future education. Frontiers of Language and Teaching 3: 1–12.Google Scholar
  29. Marrero, Darias, Soraya García-Sánchez Agustín, and Ana Ruth Vidal Luengo. 2013. Aprendizaje móvil, ubicuo y autónomo de lenguas extranjeras en la ULPGC. Cuadernos de InnovaciónEducativa 1: 11–35.Google Scholar
  30. Mellati, Morteza, Marzieh Khademi, and Majid Abolhassani. 2018. Creative interaction in social networks: Multi-synchronous language learning environments. Education and Information Technologies: 1–19.Google Scholar
  31. Milrad, Marcello, and H. Ulrich Hoppe. 2012. Learning with collaborative mobile technologies. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, ed. Norbert Seel, 684. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. MoLeNET: The mobile learning network. 2007. http://www.molenet.org.uk/. Accessed 10 Nov 2014.
  33. Pintrich, Paul R. 2003. A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology 95 (4): 667–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Psotka, Joe. 2012. Interactive learning environments. In Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, ed. Norbert Seel, 1604–1606. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Rudd, Denis P., II, and Denis P. Rudd. 2014. The value of video in online education. Journal of Instruction Pedagogy 13: 1–7 http://www.aabri.com/manuscripts/131760.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2014.Google Scholar
  36. Sappington, Thomas E. 1984. Creating learning environments conducive to change: The role of fear/safety in the adult learning process. Innovative Higher Education 9 (1): 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schuck, Sandy, Matthew Kearney, and Kevin Burden. 2017. Exploring mobile learning in the third space. Technology, Pedagogy and Education 26 (2): 121–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sears, David A., and Hui-Hua Pai. 2013. Effects of cooperative versus individual study on learning and motivation after reward-removal. The Journal of Experimental Education 80: 246–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Silva, Elena. 2009. Measuring skills for 21st century learning. Phi Delta Kappan 80 (9): 630–634 http://216.78.200.159/RandD/Phi%20Delta%20Kappan/Measuring%20Skills%20for%2021st%20Century%20-%20Silva.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. The e-Learning Guild: Community and resources for eLearning professionals. 2014. http://www.elearningguild.com/. Accessed 5 Nov 2014.
  41. Vizoso, Martín, and María, Clara. 2013. Los MOOCs un estilo de educación 3.0. In Scopeo informe n° 2. Mooc: estado de la situación actual, posibilidades, retos y futuro, 239–261. http://scopeo.usal.es/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/scopeoi002.pdf. Accessed 21 Oct 2014.
  42. Wu, Wen-Chi Vivian, Ling Ling Yen, and Michael Marek. 2011. Using online EFL interaction to increase confidence, motivation, and ability. Educational Technology and Society 14 (3): 118–129.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Modern Philology, Translation and InterpretingUniversidad de Las Palmas de Gran CanariaLas Palmas de Gran CanariaSpain

Section editors and affiliations

  • Kshama Pandey
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationMahatma Jyotiba Phule Rohilkhand UniversityBareillyIndia

Personalised recommendations