Mobile Web 2.0 Tools and Applications in Online Training and Tutoring

  • Zuzana PalkovaEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history


Today, over six billion people have access to a connected mobile device and for every person who accesses the internet from a computer to do so from a mobile device as well. Mobile technology is changing the way we live and it is beginning to change the way we learn (UNESCO, Retrieved from, 2014).

Mobile Learning (m-learning), referred also as “anytime and anyplace learning,” has evolved with the introduction of mobile and hand-held devices, such as mobile phones, laptops, notebooks, and tablet PCs, in teaching and learning, together with broadband and wireless data transmission. This greater connectivity creates opportunities for flexible, collaborative modes of learning, while supporting stronger links between learning at work, in the home, at school, and in the community.

As the main advantages of mobile technologies in education can be consider:
  • spontaneity – learning activities take place when the learner feels ready, or can be used to fill “dead time”

  • immediacy – learning becomes possible at the point of need, regardless of location

  • increased access – learning resources can be accessed from the workplace and in the field, while traveling, during classes and lectures

  • portability – communication with peers and tutors; and the capture, storage, and retrieval of information in multimedia formats are possible from one device at any location.

This chapter aims to present the new trends for education – mobile learning, through the outcomes of the Leonardo da Vinci project MobiVET 2.0 – Mobile Web 2.0 e-Training for Vocational Education Trainers (MobiVET 2.0, Retrieved from, 2014). The MobiVET 2.0 project aimed at filling the online training gap between the self-directed learners and VET trainers by developing mobile e-learning 2.0 knowledge and skills of the trainers thus turning them from in-class trainers to skilled online tutors (etutors).


Technology enhance learning Mobile learning Web 2.0 Learning 2.0 Learning methodology Innovation Vocational education and training 


  1. ADDIE. 2014, December 29. ADDIE model. Retrieved from
  2. Agilemodeling. 2014, December 29. Agilemodeling. Retrieved from
  3. Albayrak, D., and Y. Zahide. 2015. Using social networking sites for teaching and learning: Students’ involvement in and acceptance of Facebook® as a course management system. Journal of Educational Computing Research 52 (2): 155–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, P. 2007. What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch, Feb. 2007. Bristol: JISC. Retrieved from
  5. Bartolomé, A. 2008. Web 2.0 and new learning paradigms. elearning Papers 8: 1–10.Google Scholar
  6. Caudill, J.G. 2007. The growth of m-Learning and the growth of mobile computing: Parallel developments. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2).
  7. Crowder, N. 1969. Automatic tutoring by intrinsic programming. Washington, DC: National Education Assn.Google Scholar
  8. De Lima, M., and M.E. Zorrilla. 2017. Social networks and the building of learning communities: An experimental study of a social MOOC. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(1).
  9. Downes, S. 2005. E-learning 2.0. Retrieved from
  10. El-Hussein, M.O. 2010. Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. Educational Technology & Society 13: 12–21.Google Scholar
  11. Figueredo, O.V. 2015. Framework for design of mobile learning strategies. In Zhang Y. (eds) Handbook of mobile teaching and learning. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  12. Hossain, L.W. 2004. ICT enabled virtual collaboration through trust. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10 (1): JCMC1014. Scholar
  13. IDC. 2007. Retrieved from
  14. Ionitescu, S. 2014. Online platform and training methodology in Mobivet 2.0: The optimum tool for self-directed learners and trainers in vocational education and training. Scientific Papers. Series. Management, Economic Engineering in Agriculture and Rural Development 14: 351–357.Google Scholar
  15. JRC. 2009. Learning 2.0 – the impact of Web 2.0 innovations on education and training in Europe. Retrieved from
  16. Kelly, P. 2011. Web 2.0-based e-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. The Journal of Open Learning, Distance and e-Learning 26 (3): 280–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Learning, M. 2014. Mobile learning: Effective anytime, anywhere education. Retrieved from
  18. Lee, M., and C. McLoughlin. 2010. Web 2.0-based E-learning: Applying social informatics for tertiary teaching. (pp. 1-483) Publisher: IGI Global. Retrieved from
  19. Liyanagunawardena, T.R., and S.A. William. 2014. Massive open online courses on health and medicine: Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research 16 (8): e191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCann, K. H. 2009. Virtual communities for educators: An overview of supports and best practices. [Electronic version].In Proceedings from technology, colleges, and community conference, 137–142. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i at Manoa.Google Scholar
  21. MobiVET 2.0. 2014. Retrieved from
  22. O’Reilly, T. 2007. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & Strategies. Retrieved from
  23. O’Reilly, T.. 2014. What is Web 2.0? Retrieved from
  24. Palkova, Z. 2014. Using virtual environments for vocational education: The Avares case.In DIVAI 2014, 147–153. Praha: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  25. Palkova, Z. (2017). An innovative virtual reality educational environment for school physics education: Slovakia case. In EDULEARN17 Proceedings, 7790–7797.Google Scholar
  26. Palkova, Z., and E. Vakhtina. 2015. Innovative learning: From multimedia to virtual worlds. In EDULEARN15 proceedings, 1590–1599.Google Scholar
  27. Palková, Z., A. Bandlerová, L. Schwarczová, and P. Bielik. 2014. WEB2.0 Technologies and their applications in online training. In INTED2014 proceedings, 4960–4966.Google Scholar
  28. Parusheva, S., et al. 2018. Use of social media in higher education. TEM Journal 7 (1): 171–181.Google Scholar
  29. Skinner, B. 1954. The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review 24: 86.Google Scholar
  30. Teachthought. 2014. 12-principles-of-mobile-learning. Retrieved from
  31. Tincanapi. 2014. Retrieved from
  32. W3C. 2014. Retrieved from
  33. Wainfan, L.P. 2004. Challenges in virtual collaboration: Videoconferencing, audioconferencing, and computer-mediated communications. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
  34. Wiener, N. 1961. Cybernetics: Or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Paris/Cambridge, MA: Hermann & Cie/MIT Press.Google Scholar
  35. Zhang, Y. 2015. Characteristics of mobile teaching and learning. In Handbook of mobile teaching and learning. Springer.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering, Automation and Informatics (TF)Slovak University of Agriculture in NitraNitraSlovakia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Hea-Jin Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Education and Human Ecology, Faculty of Mathematics EducationThe Ohio State University at LimaLimaUSA

Personalised recommendations