Advertisement

Evaluation of Mobile Teaching and Learning Projects, an Introduction

  • Raeal MooreEmail author
Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Abstract

The percentage of people who have access to technological devices has proliferated, which, in turn, has expanded the utility and accessibly of mobile devices for both non-educational and educational purposes. Despite the Joint Information Systems Committee’s (JISC 2010) call for systematic evaluations of mobile learning initiatives almost a decade ago, evaluation projects that take a systematic approach at determining the value of mobile learning are scarce. More knowledge is needed to better understand the organizational support needed for their successful deployment, how to operationalize fidelity of implementation when unintended consequences transpire, and how best to measure the impact of mobility on learning. The chapters in this section, entitled, “Evaluation of Mobile Teaching and Learning Projects, an Introduction”, begin to tackle these issues by articulating the myriad of issues to consider when evaluating mobile learning initiatives in education. These evaluations are primarily positioned in higher education but also span K-12 and informal settings. Taken together, these chapters exhibit the necessity for evaluations to focus on the technology, the user, and the context. Too, the chapters accentuate evaluating the mobility of the person and the learning process, rather than the mobility of the device, per se.

References

  1. Bano, M., D. Zowgi, M. Kearney, S. Schuck, and P. Aubusson. 2018. Mobile learning for science and mathematics school education: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Computers & Education 121: 30–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Crompton, H., and D. Burke. 2018. The use of mobile learning in higher education: A systematic review. Computers & Education 123: 53–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Crompton, H., D. Burke, and K.H. Gregory. 2017. The use of mobile learning in PK-12 education: A systematic review. Computers & Education 110: 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eliasson, J., T. Pargman, J. Nouri, D. Spikol, and R. Ramberg. 2011. Mobile devices as support rather than distraction for mobile learners: Evaluating guidelines for design. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 3 (2): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Goktas, Y., S. Yildirim, and Z. Yildirim. 2009. Main barriers and possible enablers of ICTs integration into pre-service teacher education programs. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 12 (1): 193–204.Google Scholar
  6. JISC InfoNet. 2011. Mobile learning infoKit. Retrieved from: https://2020research.files.wordpress.com/2011/07/mobile-learning-infokit.pdf.
  7. Levene, J., and H. Seabury. 2015. Evaluation of mobile learning: Current research and implications for instructional designers. TechTrends 59 (6): 46–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moore, R. 2018. Smartphones and Laptops are the most accessible technological devices students have at home. Iowa City: ACT. https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/R1680-tech-devices-at-home-2018-05.pdf.
  9. Moore, R, and D. Vitale. 2018. High school students’ access to and use of technology at home and in school. Iowa City: ACT. https://www.act.org/content/dam/act/unsecured/documents/R1692-tech-device-access-2018-07.pdf.
  10. Moore, R., D. Vitale, and N. Stawinoga. 2018. The digital divide and educational equity: A look at students with very limited access to electronic devices at home. Iowa City: ACT.Google Scholar
  11. Motiwalla, L.F. 2007. Mobile learning: A framework and evaluation. Computers & Education 49: 581–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Park, Y. 2011. A pedagogical framework for mobile learning: Categorizing educational applications of mobile technologies into four types. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12 (2): 78–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Purcell, K., Al. Heaps, J. Buchanan, and L. Friedrich. 2013. How teachers are using technology at home and in their classrooms. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/02/28/how-teachers-are-using-technology-at-home-and-in-their-classrooms/.
  14. Sharples, M. 2009. Methods for evaluating mobile learning. In Researching mobile learning: Frameworks, tools, and research designs, ed. G.N. Vavoula, N. Pachler, and A. Kukulska-Hulme, 17–39. Oxford: Peter Lang Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  15. Sharples, M., J. Taylor, and G. Vavoula. 2007. A theory of learning for the mobile age. In The sage handbook of eLearning research, ed. R. Andrews and C. Haythronthwaite, 221–247. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Suarez, A., M. Spechter, F. Prinsen, M. Kalz, and S. Ternier. 2018. A review of the types of mobile activities in mobile inquiry – Based learning. Computers & Education 118: 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sung, Y., K. Chang, and T. Liu. 2016. The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ eLearning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education 94: 252–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vavoula, G., and M. Sharples. 2009. Meeting the challenges in evaluating mobile learning: A 3-level evaluation framework. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning 1 (2): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang, Y.S., M.C. Wu, and H.Y. Wang. 2009. Investigating the determinates and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 40 (1): 92–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wu, W., Y.J. Wu, C. Chen, H. Kao, C. Lin, and S. Huang. 2012. Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis. Computers & Education 59: 817–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ACT, Inc.Iowa CityUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Raeal J. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.Research DivisionACT, IncIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations