Encyclopedia of Membranes

Living Edition
| Editors: Enrico Drioli, Lidietta Giorno

Vibrating Membranes

  • M. R. Bilad
  • Ivo Vankelecom
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40872-4_594-4
Applying shear at the membrane surface is the most efficient way to control membrane fouling in a membrane filtration process (Jaffrin 2008). It is traditionally provided by coarse bubble aeration and cross-flow velocity, respectively, in dead-end and cross-flow systems. However, shear rate can also be generated by moving the membrane surfaces instead of the surrounding fluid or by moving a mass very near to the membrane surface. This type of technique is categorized as dynamic filtration systems (DFSs), also called shear-enhanced filtration. A summary of the existing DFSs is given in Table 1.
Table 1

Summary of existing DFSs (Beier 2008)

System

Description

Application and commercial system

VSEP

Membrane is oscillated at high frequency (around 60 Hz) in parallel motion relative to the flat-sheet membrane surface. The vibration energy focuses shear waves directly at the membrane surfaces repelling solids and foulant, while increasing the permeate rates.

UF, NF, RO (Pall Corp, New Logic)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Beier SP (2008) Dynamic microfiltration – critical flux and macromollecular transmission. PhD dissertation. Technical University of Denmark. http://orbit.dtu.dk/fedora/objects/orbit:82470/datastreams/file_4977139/content
  2. Beier SP, Jonsson G (2007) Separation of enzymes and yeast cells with a vibrating hollow fiber membrane module. Sep Purif Technol 53:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beier SP, Guerra M, Garde A, Jonsson G (2006) Dynamic microfiltration with a vibrating hollow fiber membrane module: filtration of yeast suspensions. J Membr Sci 281:281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilad MR, Mezohegyi G, Declerck P, Vankelecom IFJ (2012) Novel magnetically induced membrane vibration (MMV) for fouling control in membrane bioreactors. Water Res 46:63–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Genkin G, Waite TD, Fane AG, Chang S (2006) The effect of vibration and coagulant addition on the filtration performance of submerged hollow fibre membranes. J Membr Sci 281:726–734CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gomaa HG, Rao S, Taweel MA (2011) Flux enhancement using oscillatory motion and turbulence promoters. J Membr Sci 381:64–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jaffrin MY (2008) Dynamic shear-enhanced membrane filtration: a review of rotating disks, rotating membranes and vibrating systems. J Membr Sci 324:7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mezohegyi G, Bilad MR, Vankelecom IFJ (2012) Direct sewage up-concentration by submerged aerated and vibrated membranes. Bioresour Technol 118:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. R. Bilad
    • 1
  • Ivo Vankelecom
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Surface Chemistry and CatalysisKU LeuvenLeuven (Heverlee)Belgium