Advertisement

An Analytical Framework for Investigating Complex Institutions in Climate Change Adaptation: The Institutional Environment Matrix

  • Sining C. CuevasEmail author
  • Ann Peterson
  • Tiffany Morrison
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter introduces the institutional environment matrix (IEM), a diagnostic and planning framework designed to analyze complex institutional environments and determine the institutional fit of climate change adaptation responses. The framework argues that the institutional environment is comprised of rules, social structures, and organizations. It establishes the vital role of institutional arrangements in characterizing the functions and functional interdependencies of institutions. The IEM framework has a dual layer design that allows complex institutional relationships to be examined across scales. The institutional environment layer is a comprehensive inventory of institutions that outlines institutional complexities. The institutional matrix layer is the system of institutional arrangements that determines the functional interdependencies of institutions. The matrix explores institutional interplay in relation to several general institutional functions: reducing uncertainty, connecting individuals to society, fostering adaptive capacity, and mobilizing resource utilization. By providing a structure to examine complex institutional relationships, the IEM is a significant innovation for assessing the institutional fit of and interplay between existing and planned climate change adaptation responses. This framework may also be used as an analytical tool in adaptation planning and evaluation.

Keywords

Institutions Institutional environment Climate change adaptation Analytical framework 

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Johnson S (2005) Unbundling institutions. J Pol Econ 113(5):949–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN (2000) Social and ecological resilience: are they related? Prog Human Geog 24:347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adger WN, Arnell NW, Tompkins EL (2005) Successful adaptation to climate change across scales. Global Environ Change 15(2):77–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adger WN, Hughes TP, Folke C, Carpenter SR, Rockström J (2005b) Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters. Science 309(5737):1036–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Adkisson RV (2009) The economy as an open system: an institutionalist framework for economic development. In: Natarajan T (ed) Institutional analysis and praxis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Aggarwal VK (2005) Reconciling institutions: nested, horizontal, overlapping, and independent institutions. Working paper. University of California at Berkeley, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  7. Agrawal A (2008) The role of local institutions in adaptation to climate change, a paper prepared for the Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Social Development Department, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Agrawal A, McSweeney C, Perrin N (2008) Local institutions and climate change adaptation. In: Social development notes: the social dimensions of climate change, vol 113. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Andersson KP, Ostrom E (2008) Analyzing decentralized resource regimes from a polycentric perspective. Pol Sci 41(1):71–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Aoki M (2007) Endogenizing institutions and institutional changes. J Inst Econom 3(1):1–31Google Scholar
  11. Berman R, Quinn C, Paavola J (2012) The role of institutions in the transformation of coping capacity to sustainable adaptive capacity. Environ Develop 2(2):86–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Biermann F (2007) “Earth system governance” as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Glob Environ Change 17(3):326–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boano C, Zetter R, Morris T (2008) Environmentally displaced people: understanding the linkages between environmental change, livelihoods and forced migration. Forced Migration Policy briefing no. 1. Refugee Studies Center, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Boege V (2011) Challenges and pitfalls of resettlement measures: experiences in the Pacific Region. Working papers no. 102. Center on Migration, Citizenship and Development, BielefeldGoogle Scholar
  15. Bromley DW, Cernea MM (1989) The management of common property natural resources: some conceptual and operational fallacies. In: The World Bank Discussion Papers, vol 57. The World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. Brousseau E, Garrouste P, Raynaud E (2011) Institutional changes: alternative theories and consequences for institutional design. J Econom Behav Org 79(1):3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Caldwell M, Segall CH (2007) No day at the beach: sea level rise, ecosystem loss, and public access along the California Coast. Ecol LQ 34(2):533–578Google Scholar
  18. Commonwealth of Australia (1994) Environmental Protection Act 1994. Queensland, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  19. Crowder LB, Osherenko G, Young OR, Airamé S, Norse EA, Baron N, Day JC, Wilson JA (2006) Resolving mismatches in US ocean governance. Science 313(5787):617–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis CL (2006) The choice of institutions for trade disputes, a memo prepared for the Princeton Conference on Nested and Overlapping Institutions, Princeton UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Dorward AR, Omamo SW (2009) A framework for analyzing institutions. In: Kirsten JF, Dorward AR, Poulton C, Vink N (eds) Institutional economics perspectives on African agricultural development. IFPRI, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  22. Eaton D, Meijerink G, Bijman J (2008) Understanding institutional arrangements: fresh fruit and vegetable value chains in East Africa. Markets, chains and sustainable development strategy and policy paper, WageningenGoogle Scholar
  23. Eriksen S, Selboe E (2012) The social organisation of adaptation to climate variability and global change: the case of a mountain farming community in Norway. Appl Geo 33(9):159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feder G, Feeny D (1991) Land tenure and property rights: theory and implications for development policy. WB Econ Rev 5(1):135–153Google Scholar
  25. Gehring T, Oberthur S (2009) The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions. Eur J Int Rel 15(1):125–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greif A, Kingston C (2011) Institutions: rules or equilibria? In: Schofield N, Caballero G (eds) Political economy of institutions, democracy and voting. Springer, Berlin/HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  27. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  28. Gunningham N, Grabosky P (1998) Smart regulation: designing environmental policy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  29. Gupta J, Termeer C, Klostermann J, Meijerink S, van den Brink M, Jong P, Nooteboom S, Bergsma E (2010) The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environ Sci Policy 13(6):459–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hasan L (2000) Property regimes in resource conservation- a framework for analysis. MPRA paper no. 7430. University Library of Munich, MunichGoogle Scholar
  31. Heikkila T, Schlager E, Davis MW (2011) The role of cross-scale institutional linkages in common pool resource management: assessing interstate river compacts. Policy Stud J 39(1):121–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hodgson GM (2006) What are institutions? J Inst Econ 40(1):1–25Google Scholar
  33. Howlett M (2009) Governance modes, policy regimes and operational plans: a multi-level nested model of policy instrument choice and policy design. Pol Sci 42(1):71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Inderberg TH, Eikeland PO (2009) Limits to adaptation: analysing institutional constraints. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O'Brien KL (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  35. Jentoft S (2004) Institutions in fisheries: what they are, what they do, and how they change. Marine Policy 28(2):137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jordan A, O’Riordan T (1997) Social institutions and climate change: applying cultural theory to practice. CSERGE working paper GEC 97–15. CSERGE, UKGoogle Scholar
  37. Kirsten JF, Karaan ASM, Dorward AR (2009) Introduction to the economics of institutions. In: Kirsten JF, Dorward AR, Poulton C, Vink N (eds) Institutional economics perspectives on African agricultural development. IFPRI, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  38. Klein PG (2000) New institutional economics. In: Bouckeart B, de Geest G (eds) Encyclopedia of law and economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UKGoogle Scholar
  39. Kooiman J (2008) Exploring the concept of governability. J Comp Pol Anal Res Pract 10(2):171–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Linnér B-O (2006) Authority through synergism: the roles of climate change linkages. Eur Env 16(5):278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. March J, Friedberg E, Arellano D (2011) Institutions and organizations: differences and linkages from organization theory. Gest Pol Púb 20(2):235–246Google Scholar
  42. March JG, Olsen JP (1996) Institutional perspectives on political institutions. Gov An Intl J Pol Admin 9(3):247–264Google Scholar
  43. Markvart TI (2009) Understanding institutional change and resistance to change towards sustainability: an interdisciplinary theoretical framework and illustrative application to provincial-municipal aggregates policy. University of Waterloo, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  44. Mattingly S (2002) Policy, legal and institutional arrangements, proceedings of the regional workshop on best practices in disaster mitigation. Asian Disaster Preparedness Center, BangkokGoogle Scholar
  45. Meyer JW, Rowan B (1977) Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am J Soc 83(2):340–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nabli MK, Nugent JB (1989) The new institutional economics and its applicability to development. World Dev 17(9):1333–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Næss LO, Bang G, Eriksen S, Vevatne J (2005) Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Glob Environ Change 15(2):125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nelson RR, Nelson K (2002) Technology, institutions, and innovation systems. Res Pol 31(2):265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nelson RR, Sampat BN (2001) Making sense of institutions as a factor shaping economic performance. J Econ Behav Org 44(1):31–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nicholson-Cole S, O'Riordan T (2009) Adaptive governance for a changing coastline: science, policy and publics in search of a sustainable future. In: Adger WN, Lorenzoni I, O'Brien KL (eds) Adapting to climate change: thresholds, values, governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  51. Nilsson M, Zamparutti T, Petersen JE, Nykvist B, Rudberg P, McGuinn J (2012) Understanding policy coherence: analytical framework and examples of sector-environment policy interactions in the EU. Environ Pol Gov 22(6):395–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. North DC (1994) Economic performance through time. Am Econ Rev 84(3):359–368Google Scholar
  54. O’Riordan T, Jordan A (1999) Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Glob Environ Chang 9(2):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Oberthür S, Stokke OS (2011) Decentralized interplay management in an evolving interinstitutional order. In: Oberthür S, Stokke OS (eds) Managing institutional complexity: regime interplay and global environmental change. MIT Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ostrom E (2011) Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Stud J 39(1):7–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pejovich S (1995) Economic analysis of institutions and systems. Kluwer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pfahl S (2005) Institutional sustainability. Int J Sustain Dev 8(1):80–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pradhan NS, Khadgi VR, Schipper L, Kaur N, Geoghegan T (2012) Role of policy and institutions in local adaptation to climate change: case studies on responses to too much and too little water in the Hindu Kush Himalayas. ICIMOD, Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  61. Preston BL, Westaway R, Dessai S, Smith TF (2009) Are we adapting to climate change? Research and methods for evaluating progress, a paper presented at the Greenhouse 2009: climate change and resources, PerthGoogle Scholar
  62. Rakova U (2009) How-to guide for environmental refugees. United Nations University, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  63. Rodima-Taylor D (2012) Social innovation and climate adaptation: local collective action in diversifying Tanzania. Appl Geogr 33(1):128–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sabatier PA (ed) (2007) Theories of the policy process, 2nd edn. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  65. Schlager E, Ostrom E (1992) Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ 68(3):249–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shafritz JM, Ott JS, Jang YS (eds) (2005) Classics of organization theory. Thomson Wadsworth, BelmontGoogle Scholar
  67. Tang SY (1991) Institutional arrangements and the management of common-pool resources. Pub Admin Rev 51(1):42–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Theesfeld I, Schleyer C, Hagedorn K, Callois J-M, Aznar O, Olsson JA (2010) The institutional dimension in policy assessment. In: Brouwer FM, Ittersum M (eds) Environmental and agricultural modelling: integrated approaches for policy impact assessment. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  69. Vallejo L (2011) From international to local: the role of coordination across institutions working on adaptation to climate change. ICARUS II conference – climate vulnerability and adaptation, Ann ArborGoogle Scholar
  70. Williamson CR (2009) Informal institutions rule: institutional arrangements and economic performance. Publ Choice 139(3–4):371–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Young OR (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. MIT, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sining C. Cuevas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ann Peterson
    • 1
  • Tiffany Morrison
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Geography, Planning and Environmental ManagementThe University of QueenslandSt. LuciaAustralia

Personalised recommendations