Advertisement

Probabilistic Methods in Toxicology

  • Odile MekelEmail author
  • Rainer Fehr
Living reference work entry
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The concepts of “variability” and “uncertainty” play a central role in exposure and risk assessment. Traditionally applied worst-case scenarios do not adequately reflect the requirements of modern practice. Methods of probabilistic analysis, such as Monte Carlo simulations, are promising developments for sound consideration of these aspects.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Eva Barrenberg for her English translation assistance.

References

  1. Bogen K, Cullen A, Frey HC, Price P (2009) Probabilistic exposure analysis for chemical risk characterization. Toxicol Sci 109(1):4–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiu WA, Axelrad DA, Dalaijamts C, Dockins C, Shao K, Shapiro AJ, Paoli G (2018) Beyond the RfD: broad application of a probabilistic approach to improve chemical dose-response assessments for noncancer effects. Environ Health Perspect 126(6):067009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cullen C, Frey HC (1999) Probabilistic techniques in exposure assessment: a handbook for dealing with variability and uncertainty in models and inputs. Plenum Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Lindtner O (2014) Unsicherheitsanalysen für Datenquellen zur Expositionsschätzung im Rahmen der Lebensmittelsicherheit. Universität Paderborn, Institut für Ernährung, Konsum und Gesundheit 2014. http://digital.ub.uni-paderborn.de/hs/content/titleinfo/1246666
  5. Mekel OCL, Fehr R (2000) Berücksichtigung von Variabilität und Unsicherheit in quantitativen Risikoabschatzungen (QRA). Umweltwiss Schadst Forsch 12:43–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mekel O, Mosbach-Schulz O, Schümann M, Okken P-K, Peters C, Herrmann J, Hehl O, Bubenheim M, Fehr R, Timm J (2007) Evaluation von Standards und Modellen zur probabilistischen Expositionsabschätzung. WaBoLu-Hefte, 02/07–05/07, Umweltbundesamt (UBA), Berlin. http://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/evaluation-von-standards-modellen-zur-2
  7. Schendel T, Jung C, Lindtner O, Greiner M (2018) Guidelines for uncertainty analysis: application of the respective documents of EFSA and BfR for exposure assessments. EFSA Supporting Publications 2018: EN-1472. 113 pp.  https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2018.EN-1472
  8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (US-EPA) (2011) Exposure factors handbook 2011 edition (final). EPA/600/R-09/052F. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Vermeire T, Pieters M, Rennen M, Bos P (2001) Probabilistic assessment factors for human health risk assessment. RIVM report 601516005, TNO report V3489. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, BilthovenGoogle Scholar
  10. World Health Organization (WHO)/International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS) (2008) Uncertainty and data quality in exposure assessment. IPCS harmonization project document no. 6. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division Healthy SettingsNRW Centre for HealthBochumGermany
  2. 2.Department of Public HealthUniversity of BielefeldBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations