Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering

Living Edition
| Editors: Michael Beer, Ioannis A. Kougioumtzoglou, Edoardo Patelli, Ivan Siu-Kui Au

Psycho-social Recovery Following Earthquake Disasters

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_341-1

Synonyms

Introduction

Our awareness of our exposure and vulnerability to disaster events, and the challenges in assisting those that survive them, has been heightened by events such as the Canterbury earthquakes and the Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami. Events like these represent a serious disruption to community life, damage to property, reduced or drastically altered economic activity, and serious degradation of the environment. Moreover, they tax resources beyond the regular capacity of the organizations tasked to respond to such events, requiring the appropriation and mobilization of extra resources.

A psychosocial approach to disaster management takes the perspective of understanding the potential mental health impacts that can occur on a large scale to affected populations, as well as at an individual level. Raphael (2007) identified the key specific elements that are included in psychosocial disaster management as resilience, social...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. All right? (2013) Becoming all right?: a summary of the research behind the wellbeing campaign for Canterbury. http://www.healthychristchurch.org.nz/media/100697/allrightresearchsummary.pdf
  2. Baum A, Fleming R, Davidson LM (1983) Natural disaster and technological catastrophe. Environ Behav 15:333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonanno GA, Brewin CR, Kaniasty K, La Greca AM (2010) Weighing the costs of disaster: consequences, risks, and resilience in individuals, families, and communities. Psychol Sci Public Interest 11(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hobfoll SE, Watson P, Bell CC, Bryant RA, Brymer MJ, Friedman MJ, Friedman M, Gersons BPR, de Jong JTVM, Layne CM et al (2007) Five essential elements of immediate and mid – term mass trauma intervention: empirical evidence. Psychiatry 70(4):283–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Johal S, Mounsey Z, Tuohy R, Johnston D (2014a) Patient reactions after the canterbury earthquakes 2010–11: a primary care perspective. PLOS Curr Disaster. doi:10.1371/currents.dis.4ad3beea9e155dd5038a8d2b895f0df4, Edition 1Google Scholar
  7. Johal S, Mounsey Z, Tuohy R, Johnston D (2014b) Coping with disaster: general practitioners’ perspectives on the impact of the canterbury earthquakes. PLOS Curr Disaster. doi:10.1371/currents.dis.cf4c8fa61b9f4535b878c48eca87ed5d, Edition 1Google Scholar
  8. King A, Middleton D, Brown C, Johnston D, Johal S (2014) Insurance: its role in recovery from the 2010–2011 canterbury earthquake sequence. Earthquake Spectra 30(1):475–491Google Scholar
  9. Lock S, Rubin GJ, Murray V, Rogers MB, Amlôt R, Williams R (2012) Secondary stressors and extreme events and disasters: a systematic review of primary research from 2010–2011. PLOS Curr Disaster. Edition 1Google Scholar
  10. McNally RJ, Bryant RA, Ehlers A (2003) Does early psychological intervention promote recovery from posttraumatic stress? Psychol Sci Public Interest 4(2):45–79Google Scholar
  11. Ministry of Health (2007) Planning for individual and community recovery in an emergency event: principles for psychosocial support. National Health Emergency Plan, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  12. Mooney MF, Paton D, de Terte I, Johal S, Karanci AN, Gardner D, Collins S, Glavovic B, Huggins TJ, Johnston L, Chambers R, Johnston D (2011) Psychosocial recovery from disasters: a framework informed by evidence. N Z J Psychol 40(4):26–38Google Scholar
  13. Paton D, Johnston DM (2006) Disaster resilience: an integrated approach. Charles C Thomas, SpringfieldGoogle Scholar
  14. Raphael B (1986) When disaster strikes: how individuals and communities cope with catastrophe. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Raphael B (1993) Disaster management. National Health and Medical Research Council publication/Australian Government Publishing Service, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  16. Raphael B (2007) Chaos, challenge and change. Psychosocial recovery symposium, Queensland Health, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  17. van Emmerik AAP, Kamphuis JH, Hulsbosch AM, Emmelkamp PMG (2002) Single session debriefing after psychological trauma: a meta-analysis. Lancet 360:766–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Joint Centre for Disaster ResearchGNS Science/Massey UniversityWellingtonNew Zealand