CIRP Encyclopedia of Production Engineering

Living Edition
| Editors: The International Academy for Production Engineering, Sami Chatti, Tullio Tolio

Product Architecture

  • Peihua Gu
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35950-7_6463-4

Synonyms

Definition

In engineering design, product architecture is related to the functional elements and physical components of products and is used to define “the basic physical building blocks of the product in terms of what they do and what their interfaces are to the rest of the device” (Ulrich and Eppinger 2000). One of the most widely accepted definitions of product architecture was given by Ulrich (1995) as “the scheme by which the function of a product is allocated to physical components,” more precisely as “(1) the arrangement of functional elements; (2) the mapping from functional elements to physical components; (3) the specification of the interfaces among interacting physical components.”

Some slightly different definitions from different points of views can also be found. For example, Fixson (2005) defined product architecture from an information point of view as “a comprehensive description of a bundle of product characteristics, including number and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Dieter GE (2000) Engineering design: a materials and processing approach, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Fisher M, Ramdas K, Ulrich KT (1999) Component sharing in the management of product variety: a study of automotive braking system. Manag Sci 45(3):297–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fixson SK (2005) Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions. J Oper Manag 23(3–4):345–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gu P, Hashemian M, Sosale S, Rivin E (1997) An integrated modular design methodology for life cycle engineering. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 46(1):71–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gu P, Hashemian M, Nee AYC (2004) Adaptable design. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53(2):539–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Krishnan V, Gupta S (2001) Appropriateness and impact of platform-based product development. Manag Sci 47(1):52–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Newcomb PJ, Bras B, Rosen DW (1998) Implications of modularity on product design for the life cycle. J Mech Des 120(3):483–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Robertson D, Ulrich KT (1998) Planning for product platforms. Sloan Manag Rev 39(4):19–31Google Scholar
  9. Simpson TW, Maier JRA, Mistree F (2001) Product platform design: method and application. Res Eng Des 13:2–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Suzue T, Kohdate A (1990) Variety reduction program. Productivity Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  11. Ulrich KT (1995) The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Res Policy 24(3):419–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ulrich KT, Ellison DJ (1999) Holistic customer requirements and the design-select decision. Manag Sci 45(5):641–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ulrich KT, Eppinger SD (2000) Product design and development. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Yassine AA, Wissmann LA (2007) The implications of product architecture on the firm. Syst Eng 10(2):118–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CIRP 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing EngineeringUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Section editors and affiliations

  • Eric Lutters
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Twente, Faculty of Engineering Technology Laboratory of Design, Production and ManagementEnschedeThe Netherlands