Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering

2015 Edition
| Editors: Michael Beer, Ioannis A. Kougioumtzoglou, Edoardo Patelli, Siu-Kui Au

Global View of Seismic Code and Building Practice Factors

  • James Edward DaniellEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_407

Synonyms

Building design codes; Construction practice; Earthquake construction; Seismic-resistant codes; Worldwide earthquake standards comparison

Introduction

This entry looks at a review of seismic-resistant codes for each country in the world by examining the historical changes of codes from 1900 to 2013, the years in which updates were made, the number of buildings these codes influence, and a review of the code quality itself with respect to the hazard of that country. Over 160 countries and nations have some form of seismic code. However, the quality, extent of application, and methodologies between seismic-resistant codes differ around the world. An exploration of the location of each of these code changes, in terms of when they have been implemented, to what extent they have been implemented, and which percentage of buildings they encompass, has been undertaken.

The History of Seismic-Resistant Codes Worldwide and Their Components

Seismic-resistant building codes traditionally...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abrahamczyk L, Langhammer T, Schwarz J (2005) Earthquake regions of the Federal Republic of Germany – a statistical analysis (in German). Bautechnik 82(8):500–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambraseys NN, Bilham R (2011) Corruption kills. Nature 469(7329):153–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (1995–1996) Australian National Accounts: estimates of capital stock, catalogue no 5221, various issues. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/ProductsbyCatalogue/8D771B840483335BCA25722E001A7CC8?OpenDocument
  4. Beattie G, Thurston SJ (2006) Changes to the seismic design of houses in New Zealand. In: Proceedings, 2006 New Zealand society for earthquake engineering conference, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, WellingtonGoogle Scholar
  5. Bilham R (2013) Societal and observational problems in earthquake risk assessments and their delivery to those most at risk. Tectonophysics 584:166–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilham R, Hough S (2006) Future earthquakes on the Indian subcontinent: inevitable hazard, preventable risk. South Asian J 12:1–9Google Scholar
  7. Chin MW, Association of Caribbean States (2003) Model building codes for earthquakes and wind loads. Retrieved from http://www.eird.org/cd/acs/English/enmodel.html
  8. Daniell JE, Wenzel F, Khazai B, Vervaeck A (2011) A Country-by-Country Building Inventory and Vulnerability Index for Earthquakes in comparison to historical CATDAT Damaging Earthquakes Database losses. In: Australian Earthquake Engineering Society 2011 conference, Barossa ValleyGoogle Scholar
  9. European Union (2006) EN1998-1:2004. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance: part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: Comite Europeen de NormalisationGoogle Scholar
  10. Giardini D (1999) The global seismic hazard assessment program (GSHAP)-1992/1999, Annals of Geophysics, 42(6)Google Scholar
  11. International Association of Earthquake Engineering (IAEE) (1996) Regulations for seismic design – a world list. Retrieved from http://www.iaee.or.jp/worldlist.html
  12. International Association of Earthquake Engineering (IAEE) (2000) Regulations for seismic design – a world list, Supplement 2000. Retrieved from http://www.iaee.or.jp/worldlist.html
  13. International Association of Earthquake Engineering (IAEE) (2013) Regulations for seismic design – a world list. Retrieved from http://www.iaee.or.jp/worldlist.html
  14. International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (IISEE) (2012) Seismic design code. Retrieved from http://iisee.kenken.go.jp/net/seismic_design_code
  15. McGuire RK (ed) (1993) The practice of earthquake hazard assessment. U.S. Geological Survey, DenverGoogle Scholar
  16. Ministry of Construction (PRC) (2001/2008/2010) Chinese seismic design code: code for seismic design of buildings (GB50011-2001, 2008) (in Chinese), GB 50011-2010. China Building Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  17. Priestley MJN (1993) Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering – conflicts between design and reality. Bull New Zeal Natl Soc Earthquake Eng 26(3):329–341Google Scholar
  18. Priestley MJN, Calvi GM, Kowalsky MJ (2007) Displacement-based seismic design of structures. IUSS Press, Pavia; Distributed by Fondazione EUCENTREGoogle Scholar
  19. Romeo RW (2007) Italian seismic hazard: experiences and new building code application. In: Geohazards conference and EFG council meeting 2007. Retrieved from http://www.icog.es/_portal/uploads/pub_fedgeol/12.pdf
  20. Salic RB, Garevski MA, Milutinovic ZV (2010) The need for advanced seismic hazard assessment of the Republic of Macedonia. In: Proceedings of 14th European conference of earthquake engineering (ECEE) 2010, OhridGoogle Scholar
  21. Santa-Ana PR, Santa-Ana LG, Baez Garcia J (2012) What we have forgotten about earthquake engineering, paper no 4566. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, LisbonGoogle Scholar
  22. Standards Australia (1979) The design of earthquake resistant buildings. AS2121-1979. Standards Australia, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  23. Standards Australia (1993) Minimum design loads on structures: part 4 – earthquake loads. AS1170.4-1993. Standards Australia, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  24. Standards Australia (2007) Structural design actions: part 4: earthquake actions in Australia. AS 1170.4-2007, 2nd edn. Standards Australia, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  25. Standards New Zealand (2004) NZS 1170.5:2004 - Structural design actions. Earthquake actions., Wellington, New ZealandGoogle Scholar
  26. Statistical Office of the European Union (EUROSTAT) (2013) Housing statistics: tables and figures. Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/images/5/59/Housing_statistics_YB2014.xls

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Geophysical Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany