Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering

Editors: Michael Beer, Ioannis A. Kougioumtzoglou, Edoardo Patelli, Siu-Kui Au

Insurance and Reinsurance Models for Earthquake

  • Katsuichiro Goda
  • Friedemann Wenzel
  • James Edward Daniell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_261

Introduction

Building sustainable and resilient communities against extremely large earthquakes is a global and urgent problem in active seismic regions. A catastrophic earthquake and its cascading events, such as tsunami and fire, affect multiple structures and infrastructure simultaneously and have far-reaching economic impact across various sectors in a complex manner. Incurred seismic damage includes loss of life and limb, direct financial loss to building properties and lifeline facilities (capital stock), and indirect loss due to the ripple effects of the direct loss across regional and national economies. All these consequences are revealed in an abrupt reduction of gross domestic product (GDP) for national economy and of stock indices and prices for companies.

One of such devastating events was the 2011 M w9.0 Tohoku earthquake in Japan among recent earthquake disasters around the world (e.g., 2004 Sumatra, 2008 Wenchuan, and 2010 Haiti earthquakes). For instance, a...
This is a preview of subscription access content, login to check access

References

  1. Asprone D, Jalayer F, Simonelli S, Acconcia A, Prota A, Manfredi G (2013) Seismic insurance model for the Italian residential building stock. Struct Saf 44:70–79Google Scholar
  2. Bommer J, Spence R, Erdik M, Tabuchi S, Aydinoglu N, Booth E, del Re D, Peterken O (2002) Development of an earthquake loss model for Turkish catastrophe insurance. J Seismol 6:431–446Google Scholar
  3. Cossette H, Duchesne T, Marceau E (2003) Modeling catastrophes and their impact on insurance portfolios. N Am Actuar J 7:1–22MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Cummins JD (2008) CAT bonds and other risk-linked securities: state of the market and recent developments. Risk Manag Insur Rev 11:23–47Google Scholar
  5. Daniell JE, Khazai B, Wenzel F, Vervaeck A (2011) The CATDAT damaging earthquakes database. Nat Hazards Earth Sys Sci 11:2235–2251Google Scholar
  6. Dong W, Grossi P (2005) Insurance portfolio management. In: Grossi P, Kunreuther H (eds) Catastrophe modeling: a new approach to managing risk. Springer, New York, pp 119–133Google Scholar
  7. Ehrlich I, Becker GS (1972) Market insurance, self-insurance, and self-protection. J Polit Econ 80:623–648Google Scholar
  8. Goda K (2014) Seismic risk management of insurance portfolio using catastrophe bonds. Comput Aided Civ Infrastruct Eng. doi:10.1111/mice.12093Google Scholar
  9. Goda K, Ren J (2013) Seismic risk exposure modelling of insurance portfolio using extreme value theory and copula. In: Tesfamariam S, Goda K (eds) Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 760–786Google Scholar
  10. Goda K, Yoshikawa H (2012) Earthquake insurance portfolio analysis of wood-frame houses in south-western British Columbia, Canada. Bull Earthq Eng 10:615–643Google Scholar
  11. Grace MF, Klein RW, Kleindorfer PR, Murray MR (2003) Catastrophe insurance: consumer demand, markets and regulation. Kluwer, BostonGoogle Scholar
  12. Johnson EJ, Hershey J, Meszaros J, Kunreuther H (1993) Framing, probability distortions, and insurance decisions. J Risk Uncertainty 7:35–51Google Scholar
  13. Kahneman D (2003) Maps of bounded rationality: psychology for behavioral economics. Am Econ Rev 93:1449–1475Google Scholar
  14. Kajitani Y, Chang SE, Tatano H (2013) Economic impacts of the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake and tsunami. Earthq Spectra 29:S457–S478Google Scholar
  15. Kaufmann R, Gadmer A, Klett R (2001) Introduction to dynamic financial analysis. ASTIN Bull 31:213–249Google Scholar
  16. Kleindorfer P, Grossi P, Kunreuther H (2005) The impact of mitigation on homeowners and insurers: an analysis of model cities. In: Grossi P, Kunreuther H (eds) Catastrophe modeling: a new approach to managing risk. Springer, New York, pp 167–188Google Scholar
  17. Kunreuther H (1996) Mitigating disaster losses through insurance. J Risk Uncertainty 12:171–187Google Scholar
  18. Lalonde D (2005) Risk financing. In: Grossi P, Kunreuther H (eds) Catastrophe modeling: a new approach to managing risk. Springer, New York, pp 135–164Google Scholar
  19. Maccaferri S, Cariboni F, Campolongo F (2011) Natural Catastrophes: risk relevance and insurance coverage in the EU. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, IspraGoogle Scholar
  20. McNeil AJ, Frey R, Embrechts P (2005) Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques, and tools. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Michel-Kerjan E, Hochrainer-Stigler S, Kunreuther H, Linnerooth-Bayer J, Melcher R, Muir-Wood R, Ranger N, Vaziri P, Young M (2013) Catastrophe risk models for evaluating disaster risk reduction investments in developing countries. Risk Anal 33:984–999Google Scholar
  22. Mossin J (1968) Aspects of rational insurance purchasing. J Polit Econ 91:304–311Google Scholar
  23. Muir-Wood R (2011) Designing optimal risk mitigation and risk transfer mechanisms to improve the management of earthquake risk in Chile. OECD working papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions (No. 12). OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  24. Non-Life Insurance Rating Organization of Japan (NLIRO) (2008) Earthquake insurance in Japan. NLIRO, Tokyo. http://www.giroj.or.jp/english/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  25. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2008) Financial management of large scale catastrophes. Policy Issues in Insurance (No. 12). OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  26. Palm R (1995) Earthquake insurance – a longitudinal study of California homeowners. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  27. Porrini P, Schwarze R (2012) Insurance models and European climate change policies: an assessment. Eur J Law Econ. doi:10.1007/s10657-012-9376-6Google Scholar
  28. Rolski T, Schmidli H, Schmidt V, Teugels J (1999) Stochastic processes for insurance and finance. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Schlesinger H (2000) The theory of insurance demand. In: Dionne G (ed) Handbook of insurance. Kluwer, Boston, pp 131–151Google Scholar
  30. Viscusi WK, Evans WN (2006) Behavioral probabilities. J Risk Uncertainty 32:5–15MATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Wesson RL, Perkins DM, Luco N, Karaca E (2009) Direct calculation of the probability distribution for earthquake losses to a portfolio. Earthq Spectra 25:687–706Google Scholar
  32. Yucemen MS (2013) Probabilistic assessment of earthquake insurance rates for buildings. In: Tesfamariam S, Goda K (eds) Handbook of seismic risk analysis and management of civil infrastructure systems. Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, pp 787–814Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katsuichiro Goda
    • 1
  • Friedemann Wenzel
    • 2
  • James Edward Daniell
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Geophysical Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany