Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering

2015 Edition
| Editors: Michael Beer, Ioannis A. Kougioumtzoglou, Edoardo Patelli, Siu-Kui Au

Safety Assessment of Piled Buildings in Liquefiable Soils: Mathematical Tools

  • Subhamoy BhattacharyaEmail author
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35344-4_232
  • 215 Downloads

Synonyms

Case study of pile damage during the 1995 Kobe earthquake; Geotechnical analysis of pile foundation in liquefiable soils; Numerical Modeling; Pile foundations in liquefiable soils; Reliability of pile foundations; Seismic Analysis of Pile Foundations; Soil-Structure Interaction

Introduction

Piles are routinely used as foundations to support short-to-medium span bridges and buildings typically over four stories and other structures. Collapse and/or severe damage of pile-supported structures is still observed in liquefiable soils after most major earthquakes such as the 1995 Kobe earthquake (Japan), the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake (Turkey), and the 2001 Bhuj earthquake (India). The failures not only occurred in laterally spreading (sloping) ground but were also observed in level ground where no lateral spreading would be anticipated. A good discussion on the failure modes can be found in Bhattacharya and Madabhushi (2008).

The failures were often accompanied by settlement and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adhikari S, Bhattacharya S (2008) Dynamic instability of pile-supported structures in liquefiable soils during earthquakes. Shock and Vibration 16(6):665–685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson AW, Blume JA, Degenkolb HJ, Hammill HB, Knapik EM, Marchand HL, Powers HC, Rinne JE, Sedgwick GA, Sjoberg HO (1952) Lateral forces of earthquake and wind. Trans ASCE 117:716–80Google Scholar
  3. Bhattacharya S (2003) Pile instability during earthquake liquefaction. Ph.D Thesis, University of Cambridge, U.K.Google Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya S (2006) Safety assessment of existing piled foundations in liquefiable soils against buckling instability. ISET J Earthquake Technol 43:133–147Google Scholar
  5. Bhattacharya S, Goda K (2013) Probabilistic buckling analysis of axially loaded piles in liquefiable soils. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 45:13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhattacharya S, Madabhushi SPG (2008) A critical review of methods for pile design in seismically liquefiable soils. Bull Earthquake Eng 6:407–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bhattacharya S, Madabhushi SPG, Bolton MD (2004) An alternative mechanism of pile failure in liquefiable deposits during earthquakes. Geotechnique 54:203–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharya S, Madabhushi SPG, Bolton MD (2005) Reply to the two discussions on the paper “An alternative mechanism of pile failure in liquefiable deposits during earthquakes”. Geotechnique 55(3):259–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhattacharya S, Adhikari S, Alexander NA (2009) A simplified method for unified buckling and free vibration analysis of pile-supported structures in seismically liquefiable soils. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 29:1220–1235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CEN (2004) Eurocode 8, design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, EN 1998-1:2004. Comite Europeen de Normalisation, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  11. Cetin KO, Der Kiureghian A, Seed RB (2002) Probabilistic model for the initiation of seismic soil liquefaction. Struct Safety 24:67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cetin KO, Seed RB, Der Kiureghian A, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF Jr, Kayen RE, Moss RES (2004) Standard Penetration Test-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130:1314–1340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dash SR, Bhattacharya S, Blakeborough A (2010) Bending-buckling interaction as a failure mechanism of piles in liquefiable soils. Soil Dyn Earthquake Eng 30:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goda K, Atkinson GM, Hunter JA, Crow C, Motazedian D (2011) Probabilistic liquefaction hazard analysis for four Canadian cities. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:190–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IS 1893 (2001) Indian Standard for Seismic DesignGoogle Scholar
  16. JRA (1996) Japanese Road Association, Specification for Highway Bridges, Part V, Seismic DesignGoogle Scholar
  17. Juang CH, Yang SH, Yuan H (2005) Model uncertainty of shear wave velocity-based method for liquefaction potential evaluation. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131:1274–1282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lombardi D, Bhattacharya S (2014) Modal analysis of pile-supported structures during seismic liquefaction. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 43(3):119–138. doi:10.1002/eqe.2336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mavroeidis GP, Papageorgiou AS (2003) A mathematical representation of near-fault ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 93:1099–1131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moss RES, Seed RB, Kayen RE, Stewart JP, Der Kiureghian A, Cetin KO (2006) CPT-based probabilistic and deterministic assessment of in situ seismic soil liquefaction potential. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 132:1032–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. NEHRP (2000) National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP, 2000): commentary for Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA, USA 369) on seismic regulations for new buildings and other structuresGoogle Scholar
  22. Public Works Research Institute (1995) Strong-motion acceleration records from Public Works in Japan (No. 21). Ministry of Construction, Tsukuba, JapanGoogle Scholar
  23. Rankine WJM (1866) Useful rules and tables. LondonGoogle Scholar
  24. Seed HB, Idriss IM (1971) Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential. J Soil Mech Found Div 97:1249–1273Google Scholar
  25. Tokimatsu K, Ohoka H, Shamoto Y, Asaka Y (1997) Failure and deformation modes of piles due to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading in 1995 Hyogoken-Nambu earthquake. J Struct Constr Eng, AIJ 495:95–100Google Scholar
  26. Uzuoka R, Sento N, Yashima A, Zhang F (2002) 3-dimensional effective stress analysis of a damaged group-pile foundation adjacent to a quay wall. J Jpn Assoc Earthq Eng 2:1–14Google Scholar
  27. Zhao JX, Zhang J, Asano A, Ohno Y, Oouchi T, Takahashi T, Ogawa H, Irikura K, Thio HK, Somerville PG, Fukushima Y, Fukushima Y (2006) Attenuation relations of strong ground motion in Japan using site classification based on predominant period. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96:898–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SurreyGuildfordUK