Medico Legal Organization in Portugal and Legal Medicine

Reference work entry

Abstract

Legal Medicine is a medical multidisciplinary branch of knowledge that includes different areas of medicine and law. This justifies that Legal Medicine cannot be a medical speciality, as many others, since it demands a wide and deep group of information that goes from Medicine to Law, impossible to reach nowadays, due to the constant development of other medical specialities and to the human capacity to absorb knowledge.

Legal Medicine is a kind of umbrella under which many different scientific subjects, all of them with legal connection, can find a shelter, in order to reach a more reliable decision in judicial problems.

The Portuguese medicolegal organization is based on a wide definition of Legal Medicine, contrary to most common concepts about it. The development of this medicolegal organization, established at the end of nineteenth century, expanded and is very different from the Anglo-Saxon countries and even different from the great majority of the Latin ones.

The cost and efficiency of this organization are questioned.

Keywords

Forensic Medicine Forensic Pathology Legal Medicine Violent Death Forensic Toxicology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Beran R. What is legal medicine – are legal and forensic medicine the same? J Forensic Leg Med. 2010;17:137–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pinto da Costa J. Curso Básico de Medicina Legal. Porto: Eudito; 2009. p. 7–44.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    França GV. Direito Médico. 5th ed. S. Paulo: BYK; 1992. p. 25–36.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Derobert L. Droit Medical et Deontologie Médicale. Paris: Flamarion Médecine-Sciences; 1974. p. 20–45.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mathiharan K. Origin and development of forensic medicine in India. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2005;26:254–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kharoshah MA, Zaki MK, Galeb SS, Moulana AA, Elsebaay EA. Origin and development of forensic medicine in Egypt. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011;18:10–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    França GV. Medicina legal. 8th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 2008. p. 1–6.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Webel S. The world’s earliest “journal of legal medicine”. J Leg Med (NY). 1975;3:36–9.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coppola G. Medicine as ars in the Roman world. Its advance from sacral to secular approach, its trading and public diffusion: socio-political considerations and their legal consequences. Med Secoli. 1995;7:1–100.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hua P, Cameron JM, Tao JJ. Forensic medicine in China: its history to the present day. Med Sci Law. 1987;27:2–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wecht CH. The history of legal medicine. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2005;33:245–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hurren ET. Remaking the medico-legal scene: a social history of the late-Victorian coroner in Oxford. J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2010;65:207–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kumar V. Forensic medicine: a globally neglected branch. J Indian Med Assoc. 2010;108:470.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Sousa MJ C. Cerebral death. The paradigm of a new conception on teaching law. Porto: ICBAS; 1997. p. 10–32.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brinkmann B, Ceccchi R, Duchesne A. Legal medicine in Europe – Quo Vadis? Int J Leg Med. 1994;107:57–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arena V, Capelli A. Autopsy pathology: a subspeciality that must be recognized. Hum Pathol. 2009;40:903–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mihalţan F. Paradigm of forensic medicine–trends of development. Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2007;57:178–9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Boissevain I. The recognizable specialist. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 2006;131:582–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Madea B, Saukko P. Future in forensic medicine as an academic discipline-focussing on research. Forensic Sci Int. 2007;17:87–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Wood MJ, Guha AK. Declining clinical autopsy rates versus increasing medico legal autopsy rates in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001;125:924–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pounder D, Jones M, Peschel H. How can we reduce the number of coroner autopsies? Lessons from Scotland and the Dundee initiative. J R Soc Med. 2011;104:19–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bolechała F. Common paths of psychiatry and forensic medicine–history and evolution of insanity defense concept from antiquity to modern times. Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2009;59:300–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Somville FJ, Broos PL, Van Hee R. Some notes on medical liability in ancient times. Acta Chir Belg. 2010;110:405–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Simonin C. Médecine Légale Judiciaire. 3rd ed. Paris: Libririe Mloine; 1955. p. 5–26.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Derobert L. Médecine Légale. Paris: Flamarion; 1974. p. 10–45.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Franchitto N, Faurie C, Franchitto L, Minville V, Telmon N, Rougé D. Self-inflicted burns: The value of collaboration between medicine and law. J Forensic Sci. 2011;56:638–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Voo TC, Karim SA, Chan YH, Campbell AV. Evaluating the effects of an integrated medical ethics curriculum on first-year students. Ann Acad Med. 2011;40:4–15.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    31 – Law 1889 (August 17).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    32 – Decree 4808 (November 11, 1918).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Decree 5023 (November 29, 1918).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Decree Law 42216 (April 15, 1959).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Decree-Law 375 (July 17, 1975).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Decree Law 387-C (December 29, 1987).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Decree-Law 431 (November 2, 1991).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Decree-Law 11 (January 24, 1998).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Governmental Order 247 (April 21, 1998).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Decree–Law 96 (March 26, 2001).Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Decree-Law 3 (January 3, 2006).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Governmental Order 183 (February 22, 2006).Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Law 45 (August 19, 2004).Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Decree Law 131 (April 27, 2007).Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Decree Law 132 (April 27, 2007).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Deliberation 849 (May 7, 2010).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Law and Psychology FacultiesUniversidade Portucalense Infante D. Henrique and Universidade Lusíada do PortoPortoPortugal
  2. 2.Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas de Abel SalazarOporto UniversityPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations