Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection
Synonyms
Definition
An infection of the urinary tract in a patient who has had an indwelling urinary catheter for a minimum two days or has had a catheter recently removed that was present for 2 days.
Preexisting Condition
Of the 1.7 million healthcare-associated infections that occur annually in the USA, urinary tract infection (UTI) is by far the most common. These infections account for up to 32 %, or 900,000 patients infected (Klevens et al. 2007). Of these infections, approximately 80 % are associated with indwelling urinary catheters (Conway et al. 2012). These are referred to as catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTI).
Application
Diagnosis
- 1.
Presence of an indwelling urinary catheter for more than 2 calendar days with either fever or suprapubic/costovertebral tenderness and a positive urine culture with less than two species of microorganisms. This continues to apply even if the catheter was removed in the last 24 h and there is no other likely cause.
- 2.
Presence of an indwelling catheter for more than 2 calendar days with fever, suprapubic tenderness, and a positive dipstick for nitrite and leukocyte esterase, or pyuria, or positive urine gram stain. This also continues to apply even if the catheter was removed within the last 24 h (Hooton et al. 2010).
Microbiology
In the hospital environment, the spectrum of pathogens that cause UTI is slightly different from those in the community. The most prevalent, just as in community acquired infections, is E. coli, making up 47 % of infections. The next most common pathogens are Enterococcus spp. (13 %), Klebsiella spp. (11 %), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8 %). Together, they make up almost 80 % of hospital-acquired UTI causes. The remaining 20 % are a variety of other species with very low incidences (Gordon and Jones 2003).
Causes and Prevention
Inappropriate use and extended length of urinary catheterization are the most frequent causes of CAUTI. Therefore, optimizing the use and monitoring of catheterization make these infections highly preventable and can significantly decrease the incidence and morbidity associated with them (Gould et al. 2010). Recent studies have found that a single episode of catheter-associated asymptomatic bacteria and a single episode of CAUTI cost an addition of $589 and $676, respectively. If CAUTI leads to bacteremia, this adds an additional cost of $2836 (Tambyah et al. 2002).
The National Institute of Health has approved guidelines concerning the appropriate indications for using an indwelling urinary catheter. Patients who require a urinary catheter include those with urinary retention, those who need close monitoring or intake and output and perioperatively in those who are undergoing long procedures. Other indications include use to assist in healing of perineal or sacral wounds in incontinent patients, but these are special circumstances where alternatives, such as condom catheters in males, should also be considered (Conway et al. 2012).
Even when urinary catheters are used for appropriate indications, best practice dictates expedient removal, when possible. Intraoperative catheters should be used only as necessary instead of routinely and discontinued within 24 h of the end time of operation.
When inserting a catheter, the smallest diameter possible should be used to avoid trauma to the urethra, which can serve as an entry point for infection. Sterile equipment and aseptic technique should be employed upon insertion, and only personnel trained in aseptic technique should participate in catheter insertion. Antiseptic lubricants have shown to be unnecessary for insertion, but the use of antiseptic agents versus sterile water to clean the urethral meatus prior to insertion remains a question that has yet to be answered. Lastly, catheters should be secured after insertion to prevent movement and trauma to the urethra from traction (Gould et al. 2010).
When maintaining a catheter, it is recommended to use a sterile drainage system and most guidelines recommend using a preconnected system with sealed junctions. If the drainage system becomes inadvertently disconnected, the entire apparatus, including the indwelling catheter, must be removed and replaced with a new one using aseptic technique. The drainage bag must be kept below the level of the bladder to prevent backflow, and routine irrigation, without indication, should be avoided (Conway et al. 2012).
Due to the preventable nature of CAUTI, many hospitals in the USA have put in place systems of quality assurance and close monitoring of catheter insertion and maintenance. These systems include urinary catheter removal prompts or reminders, nurse-initiated catheter discontinuation protocols, bedside ultrasound monitoring, and intermittent catheterization. With these methods in place, an annual decrease in CAUTI rates has been observed nationwide. There has been a 6 % decrease in CAUTI from 2009 to 2010, and some states report an even more substantial decrease, such as Michigan with a 25 % decrease (Saint et al. 2013).
Treatment
Two of the most pressing questions when it comes to treatment of CAUTI include duration of therapy and the use of prophylactic antibiotics immediately after catheter removal. In terms of duration, it has been shown that the appropriate course of antibiotics is somewhere between 3 and 10 days, depending on how long the catheter had been in place. More research needs to be done in the area of prophylaxis as no definitive evidence exists. What evidence does support is changing of a long-term catheter prior to beginning treatment for a CAUTI, as this will remove a possible nidus for infection (Traunter 2010).
Cross-References
References
- Conway LJ, Pogorzelska M, Larson E, Stone PW (2012) Adoption of policies to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections in United States intensive care units. Am J Infect Control 40:705–710PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gordon KA, Jones RN (2003) SENTRY participant groups (Europe, Latin America, North America). Susceptibility patterns of orally administered antimicrobials among urinary tract infection pathogens from hospitalized patients in North America: comparison report to Europe and Latin America. Results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2000). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 45:295–301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gould CV, Umscheid CA, Agarwal RK, Kuntz G, Pegues DA (2010) Guideline for prevention of catheter-associated urinary tract infections 2009. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 31(4):319–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hooton TM, Bradley SF, Cardenas DD et al (2010) Diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of catheter-associated urinary tract infections in adults: 2009 international clinical practice guidelines from the infectious disease society of America. Clin Infect Dis 50:625–663PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Klevens RM, Edward JR et al (2007) Estimating health care-associated infections and deaths in U.S. hospitals, 2002. Public Health Rep 122:160–166PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Saint S, Greene MT, Kowalski CP, Watson SR, Hofer TP, Krein SL (2013) Preventing catheter associated urinary tract infection in the United States: a national comparative study. JAMA Intern Med 173:874–879PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tambyah PA, Knasinski V, Maki DG (2002) The direct costs of nosocomial catheter-associated urinary tract infection in the era of managed care. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 23:27–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Traunter BW (2010) Management of catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI). Curr Opin Infect Dis 23(1):76–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar