Encyclopedia of Pain

2013 Edition
| Editors: Gerald F. Gebhart, Robert F. Schmidt

Sex Differences in Descending Pain Modulatory Pathways

Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28753-4_3967

Synonyms

Definition

The midbrain periaqueductal gray (PAG) and its descending projections to the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) have long been recognized as the key neural circuit mediating opioid-based analgesia. It is well established that administration of the opioid morphine produces greater analgesia in males compared to females, and recent studies indicate that this PAG-RVM pathway contributes to the sexually dimorphic actions of morphine. Many anatomical and physiological studies since the 1960s have characterized this descending pathway. However, the majority of these studies were conducted exclusively in males with the implicit assumption that the anatomy and physiology of this circuit was the same in females, and this now is known not to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NIH grant DA16272.

References

  1. Basbaum, A. I., & Fields, H. L. (1979). The origin of descending pathways in the dorsolateral funiculus of the spinal cord of the cat and rat: Further studies on the anatomy of pain modulation. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 187, 513–531.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Basbaum, A. I., & Fields, H. L. (1984). Endogenous pain control systems: Brainstem spinal pathways and endorphin circuitry. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 7, 309–338.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Basbaum, A. I., Clanton, C. H., & Fields, H. L. (1978). Three bulbospinal pathways from the rostral medulla of the cat: An autoradiographic study of pain modulating systems. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 178, 209–224.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Behbehani, M. M. (1995). Functional characteristics of the midbrain periaqueductal gray. Progress in Neurobiology, 46, 575–605.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Behbehani, M. M., & Fields, H. L. (1979). Evidence that an excitatory connection between the periaqueductal gray and nucleus raphe magnus mediates stimulation produced analgesia. Brain Research, 170, 85–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carstens, E., Yokota, T., & Zimmermann, M. (1979). Inhibition of spinal neuronal responses to noxious skin heating by stimulation of mesencephalic periaqueductal gray in the cat. Journal of Neurophysiology, 42, 558–568.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Craft, R. M. (2003). Sex differences in opioid analgesia: “From mouse to man”. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 19, 175–186.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Fillingim, R. (2000). Sex, gender, and pain: Women and men really are different. Current Review of Pain, 4, 24–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Jensen, T. S., & Yaksh, T. L. (1986). III. Comparison of the antinociceptive action of mu and delta opioid receptor ligands in the periaqueductal gray matter, medial and paramedial ventral medulla in the rat as studied by microinjection technique. Brain Research, 372, 301–312.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Krzanowska, E. K., & Bodnar, R. J. (1999). Morphine antinociception elicited from the ventrolateral periaqueductal gray is sensitive to sex and gonadectomy differences in rats. Brain Research, 821, 224–230.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Le Bars, D., Dickenson, A. H., & Besson, J. M. (1980). Microinjection of morphine within nucleus raphe magnus and dorsal horn neurone activities related to nociception in the rat. Brain Research, 189, 467–481.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Loyd, D. R., & Murphy, A. Z. (2006). Sex differences in the anatomical and functional organization of the periaqueductal gray-rostral ventromedial medullary pathway in the rat: A potential circuit mediating the sexually dimorphic actions of morphine. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 496(5), 723–738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Loyd, D. R., & Murphy, A. Z. (2008). Androgen and estrogen (alpha) receptor localization on periaqueductal gray neurons projecting to the rostral ventromedial medulla in the male and female rat. Journal of Chemical Neurology, 36(3–4), 216–226.Google Scholar
  14. Loyd, D. R., & Murphy, A. Z. (2009). The role of the periaqueductal gray in the modulation of pain in males and females: are the anatomy and physiology really that different? Neural Plasticity, doi 10.1155/2009/462879.Google Scholar
  15. Loyd, D. R., Morgan, M. M., & Murphy, A. Z. (2007). Morphine preferentially activates the periaqueductal gray-rostral ventromedial medullary pathway in the male rat: A potential mechanism for sex differences in antinociception. Neuroscience, 147(2), 456–468.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Loyd, D. R., Wang, X., & Murphy, A. Z. (2009). Sex differences in micro-opioid receptor expression in the rat midbrain periaqueductal gray are essential for eliciting sex differences in morphine analgesia. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(52), 14007–14017.Google Scholar
  17. Murphy, A. Z., & Hoffman, G. E. (1999). Distribution of androgen and estrogen receptor containing neurons in the male rat periaqueductal gray. Hormones and Behavior, 36, 98–108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Murphy, A. Z., & Hoffman, G. E. (2001). Distribution of gonadal steroid receptor-containing neurons in the preoptic-periaqueductal gray-brainstem pathway: a potential circuit for the initiation of male sexual behavior. The Journal of Comparative Neurology, 438(2), 191–212.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Reynolds, D. V. (1969). Surgery in the rat during electrical analgesia induced by focal brain stimulation. Science, 164, 444–445.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Wang, X., Traub, R. J., & Murphy, A. Z. (2006). Persistent pain model reveals sex difference in morphine potency. American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 291(2), R300–R306.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.US Army Institute of Surgical ResearchFort Sam HoustonUSA
  2. 2.Neuroscience InstituteGeorgia State UniversityAtlantaUSA