Bromby, M. C., & Hall, M. J. J. (2002). The development and rapid evaluation of the knowledge model of ADVOKATE: An advisory system to assess the credibility of eyewitness testimony. In T. J. M. Bench-Capon, A. Daskalopulu, & R. G. F. Winkels (Eds.), Legal knowledge and information system, JURIX 2002: The fifteenth annual conference (pp. 143–152). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Hough, P., & Rogers, P. (2007–2008). Individuals who report being abducted by aliens: Investigating the differences in fantasy proneness, emotional intelligence and the big five personality factors. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 27(2), 139–161.
Hyman, I. E., & Pentland, J. (1996). The role of mental imagery in the creation of false childhood memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 101–117.
Kassin, S. M., Tubb, V. A., Hosch, H. M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the “general acceptance” of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 56(5), 405–416.
Keener, C. S. (2011). Miracles: The credibility of the New Testament accounts (Vol. 2). Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.
Köhnken, G. (1989). Behavioral correlates of statement credibility: Theories, paradigms, and results. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 271–289). New York: Springer.
Larmer, R. A. (2014). The legitimacy of miracle. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Lipton, J. P. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(1), 90–95.
Lipton, J. P. (1983). Silence is not golden. American Psychologist, 38, 564–572.
Lugo, L. (Ed.). (2006). Spirit and power: A 10-country survey of Pentecostals [PDF version]. Washington, DC: Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2006/10/pentecostals-08.pdf.
Maass, A., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Eyewitness identification: Simulating the “weapon effect”. Law and Human Behavior, 13(4), 397–408.
Mazzoni, G., & Memon, A. (2003). Imagination can create false autobiographical memories. Psychological Science, 14(2), 186–188.
Memon, A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility (2nd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.
Merckelbach, H. (2004). Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricated memories. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1371–1382.
Peace, K. A., Brower, K. L., & Rocchio, A. (2015). Is truth stranger than fiction? Bizarre details and credibility assessment. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(1), 38–49.
Pickel, K. (1999). The influence of context on the “weapon focus” effect. Law and Human Behavior, 23(3), 299–311.
Redman, J. C. S. (2010). How accurate are eyewitnesses? Bauckham and the eyewitnesses in the light of psychological research. Journal of Biblical Literature, 129(1), 177–197.
Saunders, J., & MacLeod, M. D. (2002). New evidence on the suggestibility of memory: The role of retrieval-induced forgetting in misinformation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 8(2), 127–142.
Schacter, D. L., & Scarry, E. (Eds.). (2000). Memory, brain, and belief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Smalarz, L., & Wells, G. L. (2013). Eyewitness certainty as a system variable. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Reform of eyewitness identification procedures (pp. 161–177). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wright, D. B., Memon, A., Dalton, G., Milne, R., & Horry, R. (2013). Field studies of eyewitness memory. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Reform of eyewitness identification procedures (pp. 179–201). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.