Skip to main content

Miracle Eyewitness Reports

Influence of Miracle Claims

Miracle eyewitness reports are of paramount importance to both the history of religions and contemporary experiences of religiosity. However, defining a bona fide “miracle” often proves difficult when variant criteria and metaphysical assumptions are considered. Regardless of whether researchers believe miracles must necessarily circumvent natural physical laws or can occur through those same natural processes, it is evident that miracles inexorably involve the deliberate intervention of deity that causes an anomalous and religiously noteworthy event, which ultimately surpasses the ability of mere natural causal relationships in a given circumstance (Larmer 2014). The three Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) are predicated on such miracles. As is believed among the faithful, God miraculously founded the Israelites (Gen. 21:1–6), and then miraculously liberated them from bondage (Exod. 14:15–31). For Christians, God miraculously dispatched...

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Bibliography

  • Bromby, M. C., & Hall, M. J. J. (2002). The development and rapid evaluation of the knowledge model of ADVOKATE: An advisory system to assess the credibility of eyewitness testimony. In T. J. M. Bench-Capon, A. Daskalopulu, & R. G. F. Winkels (Eds.), Legal knowledge and information system, JURIX 2002: The fifteenth annual conference (pp. 143–152). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, P., & Rogers, P. (2007–2008). Individuals who report being abducted by aliens: Investigating the differences in fantasy proneness, emotional intelligence and the big five personality factors. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 27(2), 139–161.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, I. E., & Pentland, J. (1996). The role of mental imagery in the creation of false childhood memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 101–117.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kassin, S. M., Tubb, V. A., Hosch, H. M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the “general acceptance” of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 56(5), 405–416.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Keener, C. S. (2011). Miracles: The credibility of the New Testament accounts (Vol. 2). Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhnken, G. (1989). Behavioral correlates of statement credibility: Theories, paradigms, and results. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 271–289). New York: Springer.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Larmer, R. A. (2014). The legitimacy of miracle. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, J. P. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(1), 90–95.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, J. P. (1983). Silence is not golden. American Psychologist, 38, 564–572.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lugo, L. (Ed.). (2006). Spirit and power: A 10-country survey of Pentecostals [PDF version]. Washington, DC: Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2006/10/pentecostals-08.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maass, A., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Eyewitness identification: Simulating the “weapon effect”. Law and Human Behavior, 13(4), 397–408.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoni, G., & Memon, A. (2003). Imagination can create false autobiographical memories. Psychological Science, 14(2), 186–188.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Memon, A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility (2nd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merckelbach, H. (2004). Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricated memories. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1371–1382.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peace, K. A., Brower, K. L., & Rocchio, A. (2015). Is truth stranger than fiction? Bizarre details and credibility assessment. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(1), 38–49.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pickel, K. (1999). The influence of context on the “weapon focus” effect. Law and Human Behavior, 23(3), 299–311.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Redman, J. C. S. (2010). How accurate are eyewitnesses? Bauckham and the eyewitnesses in the light of psychological research. Journal of Biblical Literature, 129(1), 177–197.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, J., & MacLeod, M. D. (2002). New evidence on the suggestibility of memory: The role of retrieval-induced forgetting in misinformation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 8(2), 127–142.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Schacter, D. L., & Scarry, E. (Eds.). (2000). Memory, brain, and belief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smalarz, L., & Wells, G. L. (2013). Eyewitness certainty as a system variable. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Reform of eyewitness identification procedures (pp. 161–177). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, D. B., Memon, A., Dalton, G., Milne, R., & Horry, R. (2013). Field studies of eyewitness memory. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Reform of eyewitness identification procedures (pp. 179–201). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darren M. Slade .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Slade, D.M. (2019). Miracle Eyewitness Reports. In: Leeming, D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200227-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200227-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27771-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27771-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social Sciences