Encyclopedia of Psychology and Religion

Living Edition
| Editors: David A. Leeming

Miracle Eyewitness Reports

  • Darren M. SladeEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27771-9_200227-1

Influence of Miracle Claims

Miracle eyewitness reports are of paramount importance to both the history of religions and contemporary experiences of religiosity. However, defining a bona fide “miracle” often proves difficult when variant criteria and metaphysical assumptions are considered. Regardless of whether researchers believe miracles must necessarily circumvent natural physical laws or can occur through those same natural processes, it is evident that miracles inexorably involve the deliberate intervention of deity that causes an anomalous and religiously noteworthy event, which ultimately surpasses the ability of mere natural causal relationships in a given circumstance (Larmer 2014). The three Abrahamic faiths (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) are predicated on such miracles. As is believed among the faithful, God miraculously founded the Israelites (Gen. 21:1–6), and then miraculously liberated them from bondage (Exod. 14:15–31). For Christians, God miraculously dispatched...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Bibliography

  1. Bromby, M. C., & Hall, M. J. J. (2002). The development and rapid evaluation of the knowledge model of ADVOKATE: An advisory system to assess the credibility of eyewitness testimony. In T. J. M. Bench-Capon, A. Daskalopulu, & R. G. F. Winkels (Eds.), Legal knowledge and information system, JURIX 2002: The fifteenth annual conference (pp. 143–152). Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
  2. Hough, P., & Rogers, P. (2007–2008). Individuals who report being abducted by aliens: Investigating the differences in fantasy proneness, emotional intelligence and the big five personality factors. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 27(2), 139–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hyman, I. E., & Pentland, J. (1996). The role of mental imagery in the creation of false childhood memories. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 101–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kassin, S. M., Tubb, V. A., Hosch, H. M., & Memon, A. (2001). On the “general acceptance” of eyewitness testimony research: A new survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 56(5), 405–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Keener, C. S. (2011). Miracles: The credibility of the New Testament accounts (Vol. 2). Grand Rapids: Baker Academic.Google Scholar
  6. Köhnken, G. (1989). Behavioral correlates of statement credibility: Theories, paradigms, and results. In H. Wegener, F. Lösel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 271–289). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Larmer, R. A. (2014). The legitimacy of miracle. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  8. Lipton, J. P. (1977). On the psychology of eyewitness testimony. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(1), 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lipton, J. P. (1983). Silence is not golden. American Psychologist, 38, 564–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lugo, L. (Ed.). (2006). Spirit and power: A 10-country survey of Pentecostals [PDF version]. Washington, DC: Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/7/2006/10/pentecostals-08.pdf.Google Scholar
  11. Maass, A., & Köhnken, G. (1989). Eyewitness identification: Simulating the “weapon effect”. Law and Human Behavior, 13(4), 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mazzoni, G., & Memon, A. (2003). Imagination can create false autobiographical memories. Psychological Science, 14(2), 186–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Memon, A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility (2nd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Merckelbach, H. (2004). Telling a good story: Fantasy proneness and the quality of fabricated memories. Personality and Individual Differences, 37(7), 1371–1382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Peace, K. A., Brower, K. L., & Rocchio, A. (2015). Is truth stranger than fiction? Bizarre details and credibility assessment. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 30(1), 38–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pickel, K. (1999). The influence of context on the “weapon focus” effect. Law and Human Behavior, 23(3), 299–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Redman, J. C. S. (2010). How accurate are eyewitnesses? Bauckham and the eyewitnesses in the light of psychological research. Journal of Biblical Literature, 129(1), 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saunders, J., & MacLeod, M. D. (2002). New evidence on the suggestibility of memory: The role of retrieval-induced forgetting in misinformation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Applied, 8(2), 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schacter, D. L., & Scarry, E. (Eds.). (2000). Memory, brain, and belief. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Smalarz, L., & Wells, G. L. (2013). Eyewitness certainty as a system variable. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Reform of eyewitness identification procedures (pp. 161–177). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Wright, D. B., Memon, A., Dalton, G., Milne, R., & Horry, R. (2013). Field studies of eyewitness memory. In B. L. Cutler (Ed.), Reform of eyewitness identification procedures (pp. 179–201). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Socio-Historical Examination of Religion and Ministry (SHERM Journal)DenverUSA