Multiscale Modeling of the Geomagnetic Field and Ionospheric Currents

  • Christian Gerhards
Reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter reports on the recent application of multiscale techniques to the modeling of geomagnetic problems. Two approaches are presented: a spherical harmonics-oriented one, using frequency packages, and a spatially oriented one, using regularizations of the single layer kernel and Green’s function with respect to the Beltrami operator. As an example both approaches are applied to the separation of the magnetic field with respect to interior and exterior sources and the reconstruction of radial ionospheric currents.

Keywords

Spherical Harmonic Beltrami Operator Spherical Harmonic Degree Radial Current Wavelet Kernel 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Amit H, Olsen P (2004) Helical core flow from geomagnetic secular variation. Phys Earth Planet Inter 147:125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Backus GE (1986) Poloidal and toroidal fields in geomagnetic field modeling. Rev Geophys 24:75–109CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Backus GE, Parker R, Constable C (1996) Foundations of geomagnetism. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayer M, Freeden W, Maier T (2001) A vector wavelet approach to iono- and magnetospheric geomagnetic satellite data. J Atm Sol-Ter Phys 63:581–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birkeland K (1908) The Norwegian aurora polaris expedition 1902–1903, vol 1. H. Aschehoug, OsloGoogle Scholar
  6. Chambodut A, Panet I, Mandea M, Diament M, Holschneider M (2005) Wavelet frames: an alternative to spherical harmonic representation of potential fields. J Geophys Int 163:875–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dahlke S, Dahmen W, Schmitt W, Weinreich I (1995) Multiresolution analysis and wavelets on S 2 and S 3. Numer Funct Anal Optim 16:19–41MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. Driscoll J, Healy D (1994) Computating Fourier transforms and convolutions on the 2-sphere. Adv Appl Math 15:202–250MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. Edmonds AR (1957) Angular momentum in quantum mechanics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. Fehlinger T, Freeden W, Gramsch S, Mayer C, Michel D, Schreiner M (2007). Local modelling of sea surface topography from (geostrophic) ocean flow. ZAMM 87:775–791MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. Fehlinger T, Freeden W, Mayer C, Schreiner M (2008) On the local multiscale determination of the earths disturbing potential from discrete deflections of the vertical. Comput Geosci 12:473–490MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Freeden W (1998) The uncertainty principle and its role in physical geodesy. In: Freeden W (ed) Progress in geodetic science. Shaker, AachenGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeden W, Gerhards C (2010) Poloidal–toroidal modeling by locally supported vector wavelets. Math Geosc, doi:10.1007/s11004-009-9262-0MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. Freeden W, Mayer C (2008) Wavelets generated by layer potentials. App Comp Harm Ana 14:195–237CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Freeden W, Schreiner M (1995) Non-orthogonal expansion on the sphere. Math Meth Appl Sci 18:83–120MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeden W, Schreiner M (2010) Special functions in mathematical geosciences - an attempt of categorization. In: Freeden W, Nashed Z, Sonar T (eds), Handbook of geomathematics. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Freeden W, Schreiner M (2009) Spherical functions of mathematical (geo-) sciences. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  18. Freeden W, Gervens T, Schreiner M (1998) Constructive approximation on the sphere – with applications to geosciences. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Friis-Christensen E, Lühr H, Hulot G (2006) Swarm: A constellation to study the Earth’s magnetic field. Earth Planets Space 58:351–358Google Scholar
  20. Gauss CF (1839) Allgemeine Theorie des Erdmagnetismus. Resultate aus den Beobachtungen des Magnetischen Vereins im Jahre 1838. Göttinger Magnetischer Verein, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerlich G (1972) Magnetfeldbeschreibung mit Verallgemeinerten Poloidalen und Toroidalen Skalaren. Z Naturforsch 8:1167–1172MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Haagmanns R, Kern M, Plank G (2008) Swarm - the earth’s magnetic field and environment explorers. RSSD Seminar ESTEC.Google Scholar
  23. Haines GV (1985) Spherical cap harmonic analysis. J Geophys Res 90:2583–2591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holschneider M (1996) Continuous wavelet transforms on the sphere. J Math Phys 37:4156–4165MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. Holschneider M, Chambodut A, Mandea M (2003) From global to regional analysis of the magnetic field on the sphere using wavelet frames. Phys Earth Planet Inter 135:107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hulot G, Sabaka TJ, Olsen N (2007) The present field. In: Kono M (ed), Treatise on Geophysics, vol 5. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Jackson JD (1975) Classical electrodynamics. Wiley, New YorkMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson A (1997) Time-dependency of tangentially geostrophic core surface motions. Earth Planet Inter 103:293–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kuvshinov A, Sabaka TJ, Olsen N (2006) 3-D electromagnetic induction studies using the swarm constellation: mapping conductivity anomalies in the Earth’s mantle. Earth Planets Space 58:417–427Google Scholar
  30. Langel RA (1987) The main field. In: Jacobs JA (ed), Geomagnetism, vol 1. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. Langel RA, Hinze WJ (1998) The magnetic field of the Earth’s lithosphere: the satellite perspective. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lowes FJ (1966) Mean square values on sphere of spherical harmonic fields. J Geophys Res 71:2179Google Scholar
  33. Lühr H, Korte M, Mandea M (2009) The recent magnetic field. In: Glassmeier K-H, Soffel H, Negendank JW (eds), Geomagnetic variations. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  34. Maier T (2005) Wavelet-Mie-representation for solenoidal vector fields with applications to ionospheric geomagnetic data. SIAM J Appl Math 65:1888–1912MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  35. Maier T, Mayer C (2003) Multiscale downward continuation of the crustal field from CHMAP FGM data. In: First CHAMP mission results for gravity, magnetic and atmospheric studies. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. Mauersberger P (1956) Das Mittel der Energiedichte des Geomagnetischen Hauptfeldes an der Erdoberfläche und Seine Sekuläre Änderung. Gerl Beitr Geophys 65:207–215Google Scholar
  37. Mayer C (2003) Wavelet modeling of ionospheric currents and induced magnetic fields from satellite data. PhD Thesis, University of KaiserslauternGoogle Scholar
  38. Mayer C, Maier T (2006) Separating inner and outer Earth’s magnetic field from CHAMP satellite measurements by means of vector scaling functions and wavelets. Geophys. J Int 167: 1188–1203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Michel V (2006) Fast approximation on the 2-sphere by optimally localized approximate identities. Schriften zur Funktionalanalysis und Geomathematik 29, University of Kaiser-slauternGoogle Scholar
  40. Moehring S (2010) Multiscale modeling of ionospheric current systems. Diploma Thesis, University of Kaiserslautern.Google Scholar
  41. Olsen N (1997) Ionospheric F-region currents at middle and low latitudes estimated from MAGSAT data. J Geophys Res 102:4563–4576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Olsen N (1999) Induction studies with satellite data. Surv Geophys 20:309–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Olsen N, Glassmeier K-H, Jia X (2009) Separation of the magnetic field into external and internal parts. Space Sci Rev, doi:10.1007/s11214-009-9563-0Google Scholar
  44. Pais MA, Oliviera O, Nogueira F (2004) Nonuniqueness of inverted core-mantle boundary flows and deviations from tangential geostrophy. J Geophys Res 109:doi:10.1029/2004JB003012Google Scholar
  45. Sabaka T, Hulot G, Olsen N (2010) Mathematical properties relevant to geomagnetic field modeling. In: Freeden W, Nashed Z, Sonar T (eds), Handbook of geomathematics. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  46. Schröder P, Swelden W (1995) Spherical wavelets on the sphere. In: Approximation theory, vol VIII. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  47. Thebault E, Schott JJ, Mandea M (2006) Revised spherical cap harmonics analysis (R-SCHA): validation and properties. J Geophys Res 111:doi:10.1029/2005JB003836Google Scholar
  48. Tsyganenko NA, Sitnov MI (2007) Magnetospheric configurations from a high-resolution data-based magnetic field model. J Geophys Res 112:doi:10.1029/2007JA012260Google Scholar
  49. Untied J (1967) A model of the equatorial electrojet involving meridional currents. J Geophys Res 72:5799–5810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zatman S, Bloxham J (1997) Torsional oscillations and the magnetic field within the Earth’s core. Nature 388:760763CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Gerhards
    • 1
  1. 1.Geomathematics Group, Department of MathematicsUniversity of KaiserslauternKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations