Introduction to the Semantic Web Technologies

Reference work entry

Keywords

Sugar Europe Coherence Arena Harness 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Ian Horrocks and Michael Kifer from preventing mistakes in the sections of the chapter related to logic. We also thank Neil Benn for his help in the final formatting stages.

References

  1. 1.
    Adida, B., Birbeck, M. (eds.): RDFa primer: bridging the human and data webs, W3C Working Group Note (Oct 2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antoniou, G., van Harmelen, F.: A Semantic Web Primer, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benjamins, V.R., Plaza, E., Motta, E., Fensel, D., Studer, R., Wielinga, B., Schreiber, G., Zdrahal, Z., Decker, S.: IBROW3 an intelligent brokering service for knowledge-component reuse on the world-wide web. In: Proceedings of the 11th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based System Workshop (KAW 1998), Banff. http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW98/benjamins3/ (1998). Accessed Aug 2010
  5. 5.
    Berners-Lee, T.: Information management: a proposal. March 1989 and later redistributed unchanged apart from the date added in May 1990. http://www.w3.org/History/1989/proposal.html (1989). Accessed Aug 2010
  6. 6.
    Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Scientific American Magazine, pp. 29–37 (May 2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bizer, C., Heath, T., Berners-Lee, T.: Linked data – the story so far. Int. J. Semant. Web Inf. Syst. 5(3), 1–22 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brachman, R.J., Levesque, H.J.: Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brickley, D., Guha, R.V. (eds.): RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema. W3C Recommendation (Feb 2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Brin, S., Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 30(1–7), 107–117 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bush, V.: As we may think. The Atlantic Monthly, July 1945. http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/unbound/flashbks/ computer/bushf.htm (1945). Accessed Aug 2010
  12. 12.
    Cerf, V., Kahn, B.: “A Protocol for Packet Network Interconnection”, which specified in detail the design of a Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) (1974)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, W., Kiefer, M., David, S.W.: HiLog: a foundation for higher-order logic programming. J. Log Program 15(3), 187–230 (1993)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Clocksin, W.F., Mellish, C.S.: Programming in Prolog, 5th edn. Springer, New York (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Codd, E.F.: The Relational Model for Database Management: Version 2. Addison-Wesley Longman, New York (1990)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dean, M., Schreiber, G. (eds.): OWL web ontology language reference, W3C Recommendation (Feb 2004)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Feigenbaum, E.A.: The art of artificial intelligence: themes and case studies of knowledge engineering. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1977), Cambridge (1977)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fensel, D., Decker, S., Erdmann, M., Studer, R.: Ontobroker: the very high idea. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference (FLAIRS 1998), Sanibel Island, pp. 131–135 (1998)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fensel, D., Angele, J., Decker, S., Erdmann, M., Schnurr, H.-P., Studer, R., Witt, A.: Lessons learned from applying AI to the web. J. Cooperat. Inf. Syst. 9(4) (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fensel, D., van Harmelen, F., Horrocks, I., McGuinness, D.L., Patel-Schneider, P.F.: OIL: an ontology infrastructure for the semantic web. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(2), 38–45 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Fensel, D., Lausen, H., Polleres, A., De Bruijn, J., Stollberg, M., Roman, D., Domingue, J.: Enabling Semantic Web Services: The Web Service Modeling Ontology. Springer, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fensel, D.: Ontologies: Silver Bullet for Knowledge Management and Electronic Commerce. Springer, Berlin (2001), 2nd edn. Springer (2003)MATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Garcia-Molina, H., Ullman, J.D., Widom, J.: Database Systems: The Complete Book, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Giarratano, J.C., Riley, G.D.: Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, 4th edn. PWS, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5(2), 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gruber, T.: Siri: a virtual personal assistant. Keynote Presentation at Semantic Technologies Conference. http://tomgruber.org/writing/semtech09.htm (2009). Accessed Aug 2010
  27. 27.
    Gruber, T.: Big Think Small Screen: how semantic computing in the cloud will revolutionize the consumer experience on the phone. Keynote Presentation at Web 3.0 Conference. http://tomgruber.org/writing/web30jan2010.htm (2010). Accessed Aug 2010
  28. 28.
    Halpin, H., Davis, I. (eds.): GRDDL primer, W3C Working Group Note (June 2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hedman, S.: A First Course in Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)MATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Horrocks, I.: Using an expressive description logic: FaCT or fiction? In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’ 1998), pp. 636–647 (1999)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Grosof, B., Dean, M.: SWRL: A semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML, W3C Member Submission (May 2004)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    ter Horst, H.J.: Completeness, decidability and complexity of entailment for RDF schema and a semantic extension involving the owl vocabulary. J. Web Semant. 3(2–3), 79–115 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Isaac, A., Summers, E. (eds.): SKOS simple knowledge organization system primer, W3C Working Group Note (Aug 2009)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.H.: Speech and Language Processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2009)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kelly, J.: The Essence of Logic. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1997)MATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kifer, M., Boley, H. (eds.): RIF overview, W3C Working Group Note (June 2010)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kifer, M., Lausen, G., Wu, J: Logic foundations of object-oriented and frame-based systems. J. ACM 42, 741–843 (1995)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Lausen, H., Farrell, J. (eds.): Semantic annotations for WSDL and XML schema, W3C Recommendation (Aug 2007)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lloyd, J.W.: Foundations of Logic Programming, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (1987)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Luke, S., Specto, L., Rager, D., Hendler, J.: Ontology-based Web agents. In: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Autonomous Agents (ICAA 1997), Marina del Rey, pp. 59–66 (1997)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., Schutze, H.: Introduction to Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Manola, F., Miller, E. (eds.): RDF primer, W3C Recommendation (Feb 2004)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Maslow, H.: The Psychology of Science. Harper & Row, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mauritius National Assembly: The constitution. http://www.gov.mu/portal/AssemblySite/menuitem.ee3d58b2c32c60451251701065c521ca/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  45. 45.
    Mead, G.H.: Mind, Self, and Society. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1934)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Moens, M.-F.: Information Extraction: Algorithms and Prospects in a Retrieval Context. Springer, New York (2006)MATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Motik, B., Grau, B.C., Horrocks, I., Wu, Z., Lutz, C. (eds.): OWL 2 web ontology language profiles, W3C Recommendation (Oct 2009)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Nelson, T.H.: A file structure for the complex, the changing, and the indeterminate. In: Proceedings of the 20th National Conference, Association for Computing Machinery, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL web ontology language semantics and abtrsct syntax. Section 5. RDF-compatible model-theoretic semantics, W3C (2004)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pingdom: Internet 2009 in numbers. http://royal.pingdom.com/2010/01/22/internet-2009-in-numbers/ (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  51. 51.
    Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL query language for RDF, W3C Recommendation (Jan 2008)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Reynolds, D.: OWL 2 RL in RIF, W3C Working Group Note (June 2010)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Robinson, A., Voronkov, A. (eds.): Handbook of Automated Reasoning. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (2001)MATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence – A Modern Approach, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (2003)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Schreiber, G., Akkermans, H., Anjewierden, A., de Hoog, R., Shadbolt, N., Van de Velde, W., Wielinga, B.: Knowledge Engineering and Management: The Common KADS Methodology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tomasello, M.: Origins of Human Communication. MIT Press, Cambridge (2008)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
  58. 58.
  59. 59.
  60. 60.
    http://challenge.semanticweb.org/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  61. 61.
  62. 62.
  63. 63.
  64. 64.
  65. 65.
    http://dublincore.org/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  66. 66.
    http://www.everyhit.com. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  67. 67.
    http://www.fipa.org/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  68. 68.
    http://www.foaf-project.org/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  69. 69.
  70. 70.
  71. 71.
  72. 72.
    http://ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  73. 73.
  74. 74.
    http://www.larkc.eu/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  75. 75.
    http://microformats.org/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  76. 76.
  77. 77.
  78. 78.
  79. 79.
    http://store.levi.com/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  80. 80.
  81. 81.
  82. 82.
  83. 83.
  84. 84.
  85. 85.
    http://WordNet.princeton.edu/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  86. 86.
    Wikipedia: Controlled vocabulary. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controlled_vocabulary (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  87. 87.
    Wikipedia: Energy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  88. 88.
    Wikipedia: Equipment. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipment (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  89. 89.
    Wikipedia: Formal_semanics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_semantics (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  90. 90.
    Wikipedia: Idea. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idea (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  91. 91.
    Wikipedia:. Intention. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intention (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  92. 92.
    Wikipedia: Machine. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  93. 93.
    Wikipedia: NLS (computer system). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NLS_%28computer_system%29 (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  94. 94.
    Wikipedia: OSI model. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OSI_model (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  95. 95.
    Wikipedia: Purpose. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purpose (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  96. 96.
    Wikipedia: Second-order logic. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second-order_logic (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  97. 97.
    Wikipedia: Semantic HTML. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantic_HTML (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  98. 98.
    Wikipedia: Semantics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semantics (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  99. 99.
    Wikipedia: SLD_resolution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SLD_resolution (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  100. 100.
    Wikipedia:. SQL. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQL (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  101. 101.
    Wikipedia: Tag cloud. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tag_cloud (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  102. 102.
    Wikipedia: Taxonomies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxonomies (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  103. 103.
    Wikipedia: Tower of Babel. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tower_of_Babel (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  104. 104.
    Wiktionary: Device. http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/device (2010). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  105. 105.
    World Wide Web Consortium: OWL web ontology language reference, W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/ (Feb 2004). Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  106. 106.
    World Wide Web Consortium: RDB2RDF working group. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  107. 107.
    World Wide Web Consortium: RDF primer, W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  108. 108.
    World Wide Web Consortium: The global structure of an HTML document, W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/global.html#edef-META. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  109. 109.
    World Wide Web Consortium: XML technology, W3C Standard. http://www.w3.org/standards/xml/. Accessed 6 Sept 2010
  110. 110.
    Yeates, G.: Earthworms. Te Ara – the encyclopedia of New Zealand (updated 1 March 2009). http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/earthworms/3/1 (2009). Accessed 6 Sept 2010

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • John Domingue
    • 1
  • Dieter Fensel
    • 2
  • James A. Hendler
    • 3
  1. 1.Knowledge Media InstituteThe Open UniversityMilton KeynesUK
  2. 2.STI InnsbruckUniversity of InnsbruckInnsbruckAustria
  3. 3.Department of Computer ScienceRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteTroyUSA

Personalised recommendations