Microbial Communities in Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Temperate, Tropical, Alpine, and Polar Soils

  • C. W. Greer
  • L. G. Whyte
  • T. D. Niederberger


Microbial community structures in hydrocarbon-contaminated soils from different geographical origins, soil types and with different physico-chemical properties demonstrate important patterns that alter in response to the contamination event itself, and during subsequent biodegradation. The initial microbial community structure in a soil is a function of the geographical location, the properties of the soil and the environmental conditions. The addition of nutrients, levels of contamination, moisture and other physico-chemical parameters influence the predominant microbial populations. Arid, alpine and polar soils, which are typically nutrient- and moisture-limited are often dominated by K-strategists such as Actinobacteria, that are well adapted to low resource environments, and do not show major alterations as a result of hydrocarbon contamination. In hydrocarbon-contaminated soil, including alpine and polar soils, there is a dominance of Proteobacteria especially in the early stages of hydrocarbon degradation. All groups of Proteobacteria, with the possible exception of the Epsilonproteobacteria, respond positively to the influx of hydrocarbon substrates and also to situations in which supplemental nutrients (N, P) are supplied. This pattern is altered over time as hydrocarbon degradation reaches its plateau, and is frequently dominated by Gammaproteobacteria. In temperate and tropical soils, the microbial community structure is more diverse and the responses are not as pronounced, although again, the Proteobacteria are typically dominant following hydrocarbon contamination. As more information becomes available on the microbial community structures and their response at the community level, more effective biodegradation strategies can be developed to capitalize on this succession of active hydrocarbon degrading microorganisms.


Microbial Community Microbial Community Structure Hydrocarbon Degradation Antarctic Soil Hydrocarbon Biodegradation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aislabie J, Foght J, Saul D (2000) Aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria from soil near Scott Base, Antarctica. Polar Biol 23: 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aislabie J, Fraser R, Duncan S, Farrell RL (2001) Effects of oil spills on microbial heterotrophs in Antarctic soils. Polar Biol 24: 308–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aislabie J, Saul DJ, Foght JM (2006) Bioremediation of hydrocarbon-contaminated polar soils. Extremophiles 10: 171–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baek K-H, Yoon B-D, Kim B-H, Cho D-H, Lee I-S, Oh H-M, Kim H-S (2007) Monitoring of microbial diversity and activity during bioremediation of crude oil-contaminated soil with differing treatments. J Microbiol Biotechnol 17: 67–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Børresen M, Breedveld GD, Rike AG (2003) Assessment of the biodegradation potential of hydrocarbons in contaminated soil from a permafrost site. Cold Regions Sci Technol 37: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braddock, JF, Ruth ML, Catterall PH, Walworth JL, McCarthy KA (1997) Enhancement and inhibition of microbial activity in hydrocarbon-contaminated Arctic soils: Implications for nutrient-amended bioremediation. Environ Sci Technol 31: 2078–2084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bundy JG, Paton GI, Campbell CD (2002) Microbial communities in different soil types do not converge after diesel contamination. J Appl Microbiol 92: 276–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaillan F, Flèche AL, Bury E, Phantavong Y-H, Grimont P, Saliot A, Oudot J (2004) Identification and biodegradation potential of tropical aerobic hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms. Res Microbiol 155: 587–595.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colores GM, Macur RE, Ward DM, Inskeep WP (2000) Molecular analysis of surfactant-driven microbial population shifts in hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 2959–2964.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Coulon F, Pelletier E, Gourhant L, Delille D (2005) Effects of nutrient and temperature on degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons in contaminated sub-Antarctic soil. Chemosphere 58: 1439–1448.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Del Panno MT, Morelli IS, Engelen B, Berthe-Corti L (2005) Effect of petrochemical sludge concentrations on microbial communities during soil bioremediation. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53: 305–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deppe U, Richnow H-H, Michaelis W, Antranikian G (2005) Degradation of crude oil by an arctic microbial consortium. Extremophiles 9: 461–470.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Energy Information Administration (EIA). 2005. International Energy Annual 2005, web site:
  14. Eriksson M, Ka, J-O, Mohn WW (2001) Effects of low temperature and freeze-thaw cycles on hydrocarbon biodegradation in Arctic tundra soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67: 5107–5112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gilichinsky DA, Wilson GS, Friedmann EI, McKay CP, Sletten RS, Rivkina EM, Vishnivetskaya TA, Erokhina LG, Ivanushkina NE, Kochkina GA, Shcherbakova VA, Soina VS, Spirina EV, Vorobyova EA, Fyodorov-Davydov DG, Hallet B, Ozerskaya SM, Sorokovikov VA, Laurinavichyus KS, Shatilovich AV, Chanton JP, Ostroumov VE, Tiedje JM (2007) Microbial populations in Antarctic permafrost: biodiversity, state, age, and implication for astrobiology. Astrobiology 7: 275–311.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Greene EA, Kay JG, Jaber K, Stehmeier LG, Voordouw G (2000) Composition of soil microbial communities enriched on a mixture of aromatic hydrocarbons. Appl Environ Microbiol 66: 5282–5289.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hamamura N, Olson SH, Ward DM, Inskeep WP (2006) Microbial population dynamics associated with crude-oil biodegradation in diverse soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 6316–6324.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hawle-Ambrosch E, Riepe W, Dornmayr-Pfaffenhuemer M, Radax C, Holzinger A, Stan-Lotter H (2007) Biodegradation of fuel oil hydrocarbons by a mixed bacterial consortium in sandy and loamy soils. Biotechnol J 2: 1564–1568.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Head IM, Martin Jones D, Röling WFM (2006) Marine microorganisms make a meal of oil. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 173–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Juck D, Charles T, Whyte LG, Greer CW (2000) Polyphasic microbial community analysis of petroleum hydrocarbon-contaminated soils from two northern Canadian communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 33: 241–249.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaplan CW, Kitts CL (2004) Bacterial succession in a petroleum land treatment unit. Appl Environ Microbiol 70: 1777–1786.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kasai Y, Kishira K, Syutsubo K, Harayama S (2001) Molecular detection of marine bacterial populations on beaches contaminated by the Nakhodka tanker oil-spill accident. Environ Microbiol 3: 246–255.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kasai Y, Takahata Y, Hoaki T, Watanabe K (2005) Physiological and molecular characterization of a microbial community established in unsaturated, petroleum-contaminated soil. Environ Microbiol 7: 806–818.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kleinsteuber S, Riis V, Fetzer I, Harms H, Müller S (2006) Population dynamics within a microbial consortium during growth on diesel fuel in saline environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 3531–3542.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Labbé D, Margesin R, Schinner F, Whyte LG, Greer CW (2007) Comparative phylogenetic analysis of microbial communities in pristine and hydrocarbon-contaminated Alpine soils. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59: 466–475.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leahy JG, Colwell RR (1990) Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment. Microbiol Rev 54: 305–315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Macnaughton SJ, Stephen JR, Venosa AD, Davis GA, Chang Y-J, White DC (1999) Microbial population changes during bioremediation of an experimental oil spill. Appl Environ Microbiol 65: 3566–3574.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Madsen EL (2006) The use of stable isotope probing techniques in bioreactor and field studies on bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17: 92–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malik S, Beer M, Megharaj M, Naidu R (2008) The use of molecular techniques to characterize the microbial communities in contaminated soil and water. Environ Int 34: 265–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Margesin R (2007) Alpine microorganisms: useful tools for low temperature bioremediation. J Microbiol 45: 281–285.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Margesin R, Labbé D, Schinner F, Greer CW, Whyte LG (2003) Characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading microbial populations in contaminated and pristine alpine soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 96: 3985–3092.Google Scholar
  32. Margesin R, Schinner F (1997) Efficiency of indigenous and inoculated cold-adapted soil microorganisms for biodegradation of diesel oil in alpine soils. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 2660–2664.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Margesin R, Schinner F (2001) Biodegradation and bioremediation of hydrocarbons in extreme environments. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 56: 650–663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marshall AG, Rogers RP (2003) Petroleomics: the next grand challenge for chemical analysis. Acc Chem Res 37: 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marzorati M, Wittebolle L, Boon N, Daffonchio D, Verstraete W (2008) How to get more out of molecular fingerprints: practical tools for microbial ecology. Environ Microbiol 10: 1571–1581.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mills DK, Fitzgerald K, Litchfield CD, Gillevet PM (2003) A comparison of DNA profiling techniques for monitoring nutrient impact on microbial community composition during bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils. J Microbiol Methods 54: 57–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muckian L, Grant R, Doyle E, Clipson N (2007) Bacterial community structure in soils contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chemosphere 68: 1535–1541.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Popp N, Schlömann M, Mau M (2006) Bacterial diversity in the active stage of a bioremediation system for mineral oil hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. Microbiology 152: 3291–3304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Powell SM, Ferguson SH, Bowman JP, Snape I (2006) Using real-time PCR to assess changes in the hydrocarbon-degrading microbial community in Antarctic soil during bioremediation. Microb Ecol 52: 523–532.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Prince RC, Lessard RR, Clark JR (2003) Bioremediation of marine oil spills. Oil Gas Sci Technol 58: 463–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pucci OH, Bak MA, Peressutti SR, Klein I, Härtig C, Alvarez HM, Wünsche L (2000) Influence of crude oil contamination on the bacterial community of semiarid soils of Patagonia (Argentina). Acta Biotechnol 20: 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Quatrini P, Scaglione G, De Pasquale C, Riela S, Puglia AM (2008) Isolation of Gram-positive n-alkane degraders from a hydrocarbon-contaminated Mediterranean shoreline. J Appl Microbiol 104: 251–259.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Radwan S (2008) Microbiology of oil-contaminated desert soils and coastal areas in the Arabian Gulf region. In Microbiology of Extreme Soils, Soil Biology, vol. 13. P Dion, CS Nautiyal (eds.). Berlin: Springer-Verlag, pp. 275–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Riis V, Kleinsteuber S, Babel W (2003) Influence of high salinities on the degradation of diesel fuel by bacterial consortia. Can J Microbiol 49: 713–721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Saul DJ, Aislabie JM, Brown CE, Harris L, Foght JM (2005) Hydrocarbon contamination changes the bacterial diversity of soil from around Scott Base, Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53: 141–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stapleton RD, Savage DC, Sayler GS, Stacey G (1998) Biodegradation of aromatic hydrocarbons in an extremely acidic environment. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 4180–4184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Steven B, Briggs G, McKay CP, Pollard WH, Greer CW, Whyte LG (2007) Characterization of the microbial biodiversity in a permafrost sample from the Canadian high Arctic using culture-dependent and culture-independent methods. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 59: 513–523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Supaphol S, Panichsakpatana S, Trakulnaleamsai S, Tungkananuruk N, Roughjanajirapa P, O’Donnell AG (2006) The selection of mixed microbial inocula in environmental biotechnology: Example using petroleum contaminated tropical soils. J Microbiol Methods 65: 432–441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thomassin-Lacroix EJM, Eriksson M, Reimer KJ, Mohn WW (2002) Biostimulation and bioaugmentation for on-site treatment of weathered diesel fuel in Arctic soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 59: 551–556.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vinas M, Sabaté J, Espuny MJ, Solanas AM (2005) Bacterial community dynamics and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation during bioremediation of heavily creosote-contaminated soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 71: 7008–7018.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Vishnivetskaya TA, Petrova MA, Urbance J, Ponder M, Moyer CL, Gilichinsky DA, Tiedje JM (2006) Bacterial community in ancient Siberian permafrost as characterized by culture and culture-independent methods. Astrobiology 6: 400–415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ward DM, Brock TD (1978) Hydrocarbon degradation in hypersaline environments. Appl Environ Microbiol 35: 353–359.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Whyte LG, Bourbonnière L, Greer CW (1997) Biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons by pschrotrophic Pseudomonas strains possessing both alkane (alk) and naphthalene (nah) catabolic pathways. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 3719–3723.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Whyte LG, Goalen B, Hawari J, Labbé D, Greer CW, Nahir M (2001) Bioremediation treatability assessment of hydrocarbon-contaminated soils from Eureka. Nunavut Cold Reg Sci Technol 32: 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Whyte LG, Hawari J, Zhou E, Bourbonnière L, Inniss WE, Greer CW (1998) Biodegradation of variable-chain-length alkanes at low temperatures by a psychrotrophic Rhodococcus sp. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 2578–2584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhao B, Poh CL (2008) Insights into environmental bioremediation by microorganisms through functional genomics and proteomics. Proteomics 8: 874–881.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. W. Greer
    • 1
  • L. G. Whyte
    • 2
  • T. D. Niederberger
    • 2
  1. 1.National Research Council, Biotechnology Research Institute(NRC–BRI)Canada
  2. 2.Department of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill UniversitySte-Anne-de-BellerneCanada

Personalised recommendations