Advertisement

28 Prospects and Pitfalls

  • Jean-Jacques Hublin
Reference work entry

Abstract

Paleoanthropology is primarily rooted in the study of fossils and the analysis of sites. Dependence on these resources leads to challenges resulting from the difficulty in gaining access to scarce, precious, and sometimes overprotected materials, and from issues of control over field sites. The development of virtual paleoanthropology can sometimes be a way to partially solve the first problem. However on some occasions, the access to and utilization of numerical data has also become an issue of dispute. In parallel, recent advances in studies focusing on microstructures, isotopic composition, and paleogenetics require direct sampling of the fossils. The trend in paleoanthropology is to integrate approaches from different scientific fields, and this is especially visible in developmental sciences, genetics, and environmental studies. In the meantime, dealing with human evolution remains a sensitive topic, subject to clear ideological and religious biases. The interest of the media and of the public in this science does not always contribute to an objective approach to the questions. Finally, among other issues, the expansion of paleoanthropology studies in developing countries must contend with the decline of a colonial mode of thinking.

Keywords

Physical Anthropology Extinct Species Fossil Specimen Virtual Representation Fossil Hominid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ambrose SH (1986) Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of human and animal diet in Africa. J Hum Evol 15: 707–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bard E, Rostek F, Ménot-Combes G (2004) A better radiocarbon clock. Science 303: 178–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bocherens H, Fizet M, Mariotti A, Lange-Badre B, Vandermeersch B, Borel JP, Bellon G (1991) Isotopic biogeochemistry (13C, 15N) of fossil vertebrate collagen: Application to the study of a past food web including Neandertal man. J Hum Evol 20: 481–492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bocherens H, Billieu D, Patou-Mathis M, Bonjean D, Otte M, Mariotti A (1997) Paleobiological implications of the isotopic signatures (13C, 15N) of fossil mammal collagen in Scladina Cave (Sclayn, Belgium). Quat Res 48: 370–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bocquet-Appel JP, Masset C (1982) Farewell to paleodemography. J Hum Evol 11: 321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bocquet-Appel JP, Masset C (1996) Paleodemography: Expectancy and false hope. Am J Phys Anthropol 99(4): 571–583CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Collard M, Wood B (2000) How reliable are human phylogenetic hypotheses? Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(9): 5003–5006PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Coqueugniot H, Hublin J-J, Veillon F, Houët F, Jacob T (2004) Early brain growth in Homo erectus and implications for cognitive ability. Nature 431: 299–302CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Currat M, Excoffier L (2004) Modern humans did not admix with Neanderthals during their range expansion into Europe. PLOS Biol 2: 2264–2274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dean C, Leakey MG, Reid D, Schrenk F, Schwartz GT, Stringer C, Walker A (2001) Growth processes in teeth distinguish modern humans from Homo erectus and earlier hominins. Nature 414: 628–631CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dean MC (1987) Growth layers and incremental markings in hard tissues: A review of the literature and some preliminary observations about enamel structure in Paranthropus boisei. J Hum Evol 16: 157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fabig A, Herrmann B (2002) Trace elements buried in human bones: Intra-population variability of Sr/Ca and Ba/Ca ratios – diet or diagenesis? Naturwissenschaften 89: 115–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitz Gerald CM (1998) Do enamel microstructures have regular time dependency? Conclusions from the literature and a large-scale study. J Hum Evol 35: 371–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harvati K (2002) Models of shape variation within and among species and the Neanderthal taxonomic position: A 3-D geometric morphometric approach on temporal bone morphology. In: Mafart B, Delingette (eds) Three dimensional imaging in paleoanthropology and prehistoric archaeology. BAR, LiegeGoogle Scholar
  15. Hublin J-J, Spoor F, Braun M, Zonneveld F, Condemi S (1996) A late Neanderthal associated with Upper Palaeolithic artefacts. Nature 381: 224–226CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Humphrey LT, Jeffries TE, Dean MC (2004) Investigation of age at weaning using Sr/Ca ratios in human tooth enamel. Am J Phys Anthropol 123(Suppl. 38): 117Google Scholar
  17. Huxley TH (1863) Evidence as to man's place in nature. Williams and Norgate, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalvin AD, Dean D, Hublin J-J, Braun M (1992) Vizualization in anthropology: Reconstruction of human fossils from multiple pieces. Comput Sci 1–14Google Scholar
  19. Krings M, Stone A, Schmitz RW, Krainitzki H, Stoneking M, Paabo S (1997) Neandertal DNA sequences and the origin of modern humans. Cell 90: 19–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lieberman D (1993) Life history variables preserves in dental cementum microstructure. Science 261: 1162–1164CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lieberman DE (1999) Homology and hominid phylogeny: Problems and potential solutions. Evol Anthropol 7: 142–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ludovic O, Bonjean D, Bocherens H, Thenot A, Argant A, Otte M, Hänni C (2002) Ancient DNA and the population genetics of cave bears (Ursus spelaeus) through space and time. Mol Biol Evol 19: 1920–1933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martin LB, Olejniczak AJ, Maas MC (2003) Enamel thickness and microstructure in pitheciin primates, with comments on dietary adaptations of the middle Miocene hominoid Kenyapithecus. J Hum Evol 45: 351–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mitteroecker P, Gunz P, Bernhard M, Schaefer K, Bookstein FL (2004) Comparison of cranial ontogenetic trajectories among great apes and humans. J Hum Evol 46: 679–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Nielsen-Marsh CM, Richards MP, Hauschkad PV, Thomas-Oatese JE, Trinkaus E, Pettitt PB, Karavanic’ I, Hendrik Poinari H, Collins MJ (2005) Osteocalcin protein sequences of Neanderthals and modern primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102(12): 4409–4413PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Orlando L, Bonjean D, Bocherens H, Thenot A, Argant A, Otte M, Hänni C (2002) Ancient DNA and the Population Genetics of Cave Bears (Ursus spelaeus) Through Space and Time. Molecular and Evolution 19: 1920–1933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ponce de Leon MS, Zollikofer CPE (1999) New evidence from Le Moustier 1: Computer-assisted reconstruction and morphometry of the skull. Anat Rec 254: 474–489CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Ponce de León MS, Zollikofer CPE (2001) Neanderthal cranial ontogeny and its implications for late hominid diversity. Nature 412: 534–538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Radosevich SC (1993) The six deadly sins of trace element analysis: A case of wishful thinking in science. In: Sandford MK (ed) Investigations of ancient human tissue: Chemical analyses in anthropology. (Food and Nutrition in History and Anthropology, vol. 10) Gordon and Breach, Langhorne, pp 269–332Google Scholar
  30. Ramirez Rozzi FV, Bermudez de Castro JM (2004) Surprisingly rapid growth in Neanderthals. Nature 428: 936–939CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Richards MP, Pettitt PB, Trinkaus E, Smith FH, Paunovic M, Karavanic I (2000) Neanderthal diet at Vindija and Neanderthal predation: The evidence from stable isotopes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97: 7663–7666PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Richards MP, Pettitt PB, Stiner MC, Trinkaus E (2001) Stable isotope evidence for increasing dietary breadth in the European mid-Upper Paleolithic. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98: 6528–6532PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Schoeninger MJ (1985) Trophic level effects on N-15 N-14 and C-13 C-12 ratios in bone collagen and strontium levels in bone mineral. J Hum Evol 14: 515–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwartz GT, Liu W, Zheng L (2003) Preliminary investigation of dental microstructure in the Yuanmou hominoid (Lufengpithecus hudienensis), Yunnan Province, China. J Hum Evol 44: 189–202CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Serre D, Langaney A, Chech M, Teschler NM, Paunovic M, Mennecier P, Hofreiter M, Possnert G, Pääbo S (2004) No evidence of Neandertal mtDNA contribution to early modern humans. PLoS Biol 2: 313–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith TM, Martin LB, Leakey MG (2003) Enamel thickness, microstructure and development in Afropithecus turkanensis. J Hum Evol 44: 283–306CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Spoor F, Wood B, Zonneveld F (1996) Evidence for a link between human semicircular canal size and bipedal behaviour. J Hum Evol 30: 183–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Strait DS, Grine FE (2004) Inferring hominoid and early hominid phylogeny using craniodental characters: The role of fossil taxa. J Hum Evol 47: 399–452CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Stringer CB, Dean MC, Martin RD (1990) A comparative study of cranial and dental development within a recent British sample and among Neandertals. In: DeRousseau CJ (ed) Primate life history and evolution. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 115–152Google Scholar
  40. Tafforeau P, Boistel R, Boller E, Bravin A, Brunet M, Chaimanee Y, Cloetens P, Feist M, Hoszwska J, Jaeger J-J, Kay RF, Lazzari V, Marivaux L, Nel A, Nemoz C, Thibault X, Vignaud P, Zabler S (2006) Applications of X-ray synchrotron microtomography for non-destructive 3D studies of paleontological specimens. Applied Physics A 83(2): 195–202Google Scholar
  41. Trinkaus E (1990) Cladistics and the hominid fossil record. Am J Phys Anthropol 83: 1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wagner GP (1996) Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Am Zool 36: 36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wagner GP, Altenberg L (1996) Perspective: Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50: 967–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams TA, Nagy LM (2001) Developmental modularity and the evolutionary diversification of arthropod limbs. J Exp Zool 291: 241–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Wind J (1984) Computerized X-ray tomography of fossil hominid skulls. Am J Phys Anthropol 63: 265–282CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wind J, Zonneveld FW (1985) Radiology of fossil hominid skulls. In: Tobias PV (ed) Hominid evolution: Past, present and future. Proceedings of the Taung Diamond Jubilee international symposium, Johannesburg and Mmabatho, Southern Africa, January 27–February 4, 1985. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 437–442Google Scholar
  47. Winther RG (2001) Varieties of modules: Kinds, levels, origins, and behaviors. J Exp Zool 291: 116–129CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wood B (1999) Homoplasy: Foe and friend? Evol Anthropol 8: 79–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zhao L-X, Lu Q-W, Xu Q-H (2000) Enamel microstructure of Lufengpithecus lufengensis. In: Wu X, Zhang S, Dong W (eds) Proceedings of 1999 Beijing international symposium on paleoanthropology: In commemoration of the 70th anniversary of the discovery of the first skull-cap of the Peking Man. Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, pp 77–82Google Scholar
  50. Zollikofer CPE, Ponce de Leon MS, Martin RD, Stucki RD (1995) Neanderthal computer skulls. Nature 375: 283–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Zonneveld FW, Wind J (1985) High-resolution computed tomography of fossil hominid skulls: A new method and some results. In: Tobias PV (ed) Hominid evolution: Past, present and future. Proceedings of the Taung Diamond Jubilee international symposium, Johannesburg and Mmabatho, Southern Africa, January 27–February 4, 1985. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 427–436Google Scholar
  52. Zonneveld FW, Spoor CF, Wind J (1989) The use of CD in the study of the internal morphology of hominid fossils. Medicamundi 34: 117–128Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean-Jacques Hublin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations