Encyclopedia of Neuroscience

2009 Edition
| Editors: Marc D. Binder, Nobutaka Hirokawa, Uwe Windhorst

Bayesian Statistics (with Particular Focus on the Motor System)

  • Konrad Körding
Reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-29678-2_578

Synonyms

Probabilistic inference; Statistical inference; Bayesian inference; Antonym: Frequentist statistics

Definition

As our sensors are not perfect and do not provide information about all the properties of the world, we are faced with sensory uncertainty. Moreover, our muscles also produce noisy outputs and so we are also faced with motor uncertainty. Bayesian statistics is the systematic way of dealing with uncertainty by expressing its many forms in terms of probability.

Description of the Theory

Bayesian statistics can be used to infer the states of variables that are not directly measured, a process called Bayesian inference. “For example, when we see a tennis ball (observed variable) and we know from experience how they usually fly (prior knowledge) then Bayesian statistics allows us to calculate how likely the ball will land at any given position on the field (unobserved variable).” The way inference is done is the following:

(i) The prior knowledgeabout the system is...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Cox RT (1946) Probability, frequency and reasonable expectation. Am J Phys 17:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Freedman DA (1995) Some issues in the foundation of statistics. Found Sci 1:19–83Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Körding KP, Wolpert DM (2004) Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning. Nature 427:244–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ernst MO, Bulthoff HH (2004) Merging the senses into a robust percept. Trends Cogn Sci 8:162–169PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kording K (2007) Decision theory: what “should” the nervous system do? Science 318:606–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269:1880–1882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction problems. J Basic Eng (ASME) 82D:35–45Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Trommershauser J, Maloney LT, Landy MS (2003) Statistical decision theory and the selection of rapid, goal-directed movements. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 20:1419–1433PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    MacKay DJC (2003) Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms. Cambridge University press, Cambridge, UK [also available online at http://www.inference.phy.cam.ac.uk/mackay/itila/book.html]
  10. 10.
    Kording KP, Beierholm U, Ma WJ, Quartz S, Tenenbaum JB, Shams L (2007) Causal inference in multisensory percption. PLoS ONE 2:e943PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konrad Körding
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of NeurologyLondonUK