Reflexes
Definition
(Taken from Dr. Wilfrid Jänig’s essay on Autonomic reflexes) Reflexes are functionally defined by an efferent (motor) output system that generates a distinct effector response when activated and by the population of afferent neurons stimulated. Reflexes are fragments of more complex somatomotor behaviors and are used in the laboratory as tools to study experimentally the central organization of neural regulation of movement.
Background
There is no universally accepted definition of reflexes that distinguishes them from voluntary responses to stimuli [1]. The Roman poet Ovid used the word reflex to describe “turning or bringing back.” Substitute “feed” for “bring” and we have the word “feedback.” In engineering, feedback refers to information about a process monitored by sensors and supplied to the controller of that process (see Feedback control of movement).
In biology, the first attempt at a definition of reflex is attributable to Georgiy Prochaska [2]: a behavior in...
References
- 1.Prochazka A, Clarac F, Loeb GE, Rothwell JC, Wolpaw JR (2000) What do reflex and voluntary mean? Modern views on an ancient debate. Exp Brain Res 130:417–432PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Prochaska G (1784) The principles of physiology, Prochaska on the nervous system. (De functionibus systematis nervosi. Commentatio. Wolfgang Gerle, Prague (English translation: (1851) A Dissertation on the Functions of the Nervous System). The Sydenham Society, London, p 463Google Scholar
- 3.Bernard C (1878) Leçons sur les phénomènes de la vie communes aux animaux et aux des végéraux. Baillière, Paris, pp 114–121Google Scholar
- 4.Spencer H (1855) Principles of psychology, 2nd edn. Published in 1873. Appleton, New York, p 648Google Scholar
- 5.Sechenov IM (1863) Reflexes of the brain (Refleksy Golovnogo Mozga). In: Subkov AA (ed) Im sechenov, selected works. State Publishing House, MoscowGoogle Scholar
- 6.Hughlings Jackson J (1884) On the evolution and dissolution of the nervous system. Croonian lectures 3, 4 and 5 to the Royal Society of London. Lancet 1:555–739Google Scholar