Virtual Reality

  • Giuseppe RivaEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_34-1
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

We will probably never go to the Moon, climb Mount Everest, or swim with dolphins. Virtual reality (VR), however, can allow us to do all these things using the simulative power of computers and smartphones. Specifically, what distinguishes VR from other media is the sense of presence: the feeling of “being there” inside the virtual experience produced by the technology. The feeling of presence, associated with the high level of emotional engagement allowed by virtual experiences, turns this technology into a powerful tool for exploring what is possible and engaging with it, supporting personal and clinical change.

Keywords

Virtual reality Presence Telepresence Emotional engagement Personal change Clinical change Transformation of flow Simulation 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Apps, M. A., & Tsakiris, M. (2014). The free-energy self: A predictive coding account of self-recognition. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 41, 85–97. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23416066.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.029.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Azevedo, R. T., Bennett, N., Bilicki, A., Hooper, J., Markopoulou, F., & Tsakiris, M. (2017). The calming effect of a new wearable device during the anticipation of public speech. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 2285. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28536417.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-02274-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai, Y., Maruskin, L. A., Chen, S., Gordon, A. M., Stellar, J. E., McNeil, G. D., … Keltner, D. (2017). Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(2), 185–209. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28481617.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balzarotti, S. & Ciceri, M. R. (2014). News reports of catastrophes and viewers’ fear: threat appraisal of positively versus negatively framed events. Media Psychology, 17(4), 357–377.Google Scholar
  5. Balzarotti, S., Piccini, L., Andreoni, G. & Ciceri, R. (2014). “I Know That You Know How I Feel”: Behavioral and physiological signals demonstrate emotional attunement while interacting with a computer simulating emotional intelligence. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 38(3), 283–299.Google Scholar
  6. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Guerrero, B., Liaño, V., Alcañiz, M., & Rey, B. (2005). The third pole of the sense of presence: Comparing virtual and imagery spaces. PsychNology Journal, 3(1), 90–100. Online: http://www.psychnology.org/index.php?page=abstract—volume-103—banos.Google Scholar
  8. Barrett, L. F. (2017). The theory of constructed emotion: an active inference account of interoception and categorization. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 1–23. Retrieved from <Go to ISI>://WOS:000396504400001.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw154.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, Y. C., & Spence, C. (2017). Assessing the role of the ‘unity assumption’ on multisensory integration: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 445. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28408890.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00445.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Chirico, A., Yaden, D. B., Riva, G., & Gaggioli, A. (2016). The potential of virtual reality for the investigation of awe. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1766. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27881970.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01766.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Chirico, A., Cipresso, P., Yaden, D. B., Biassoni, F., Riva, G., & Gaggioli, A. (2017). Effectiveness of immersive videos in inducing awe: An experimental study. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1218. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28450730.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01242-0.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Clark, A. (2013). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23663408.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Costantini, M. (2014). Body perception, awareness, and illusions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 5(5), 551–560.  https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1309.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Delle Fave, A., Massimini, F., & Bassi, M. (2011). Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures: Social empowerment through personal growth. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Lernia, D., Cipresso, P., Pedroli, E., & Riva, G. (2018a). Toward an embodied medicine: A portable device with programmable interoceptive stimulation for heart rate variability enhancement. Sensors (Basel), 18(8). Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30061531).  https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Lernia, D., Serino, S., Pezzulo, G., Pedroli, E., Cipresso, P., & Riva, G. (2018b). Feel the time. Time perception as a function of interoceptive processing. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12, 74. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29559902.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00074.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehrsson, H. H. (2007). The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science, 317(5841), 1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friston, K. (2009). The free-energy principle: A rough guide to the brain? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(7), 293–301. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19559644.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.04.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: A unified brain theory? Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 11(2), 127–138. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20068583.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2787.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Friston, K., Daunizeau, J., Kilner, J., & Kiebel, S. J. (2010). Action and behavior: A free-energy formulation. Biological Cybernetics, 102(3), 227–260. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20148260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-010-0364-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gaggioli, A. (2015). Transformative experience design. In A. Gaggioli, A. Ferscha, G. Riva, S. Dunne, & I. Viaud-Delmon (Eds.), Human computer confluence: Transforming human experience through symbiotic technologies (pp. 97–121). Warsaw: De Gruyter Open.Google Scholar
  22. Gaggioli, A., Cipresso, P., Serino, S., & Riva, G. (2013). Psychophysiological correlates of flow during daily activities. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 191, 65–69. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23792845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaggioli, A., Pallavicini, F., Morganti, L., Serino, S., Scaratti, C., Briguglio, M., … Riva, G. (2014). Experiential virtual scenarios with real-time monitoring (interreality) for the management of psychological stress: A block randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16(7), e167. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25004803.  https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gaggioli, A., Riva, G., Peters, D., & Calvo, R. A. (2017). Chapter 18 – Positive technology, computing, and design: Shaping a future in which technology promotes psychological well-being. In M. Jeon (Ed.), Emotions and affect in human factors and human-computer interaction (pp. 477–502). London: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2014a). In touch with the future: The sense of touch from cognitive neuroscience to virtual reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2014b). Outside the boundaries of our bodies: The relationship between touch and the representation of the body in our mind. In A. Gallace & C. Spence (Eds.), In touch with the future: The sense of touch from cognitive neuroscience to virtual reality (pp. 102–124). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ginzburg, K., Tsur, N., Barak-Nahum, A., & Defrin, R. (2014). Body awareness: Differentiating between sensitivity to and monitoring of bodily signals. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 37(3), 564–575. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23633239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-013-9514-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Glantz, K., Durlach, N. I., Barnett, R. C. & Aviles, W. A. (1997). Virtual reality (VR) and psychotherapy: Opportunities and challenges. Presence, Teleoperators, and Virtual Environments, 6(1), 87–105.Google Scholar
  29. Guan, F., Xiang, Y., Chen, O., Wang, W., & Chen, J. (2018). Neural basis of dispositional awe. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 12, 209. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30258356.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00209.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Higginson, S., & Mansell, W. (2008). What is the mechanism of psychological change? A qualitative analysis of six individuals who experienced personal change and recovery. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 81, 309–328.  https://doi.org/10.1348/147608308X320125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lenggenhager, B., Tadi, T., Metzinger, T., & Blanke, O. (2007). Video ergo sum: manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science, 317(5841), 1096–1099.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143439. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=17717189. 317/5841/1096 [pii].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maister, L., Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Tsakiris, M. (2015). Changing bodies changes minds: Owning another body affects social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(1), 6–12. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25524273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2014.11.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McLay, R. N., Graap, K., Spira, J., Perlman, K., Johnston, S., Rothbaum, B. O., … Rizzo, A. (2012). Development and testing of virtual reality exposure therapy for post-traumatic stress disorder in active duty service members who served in Iraq and Afghanistan. Military Medicine, 177(6), 635–642. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22730837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Melzack, R. (2005). Evolution of the neuromatrix theory of pain. The Prithvi Raj lecture: Presented at the third world congress of world Institute of Pain, Barcelona 2004. Pain Practice, 5(2), 85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  36. Moseley, G. L., Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2012). Bodily illusions in health and disease: Physiological and clinical perspectives and the concept of a cortical ‘body matrix’. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(1), 34–46. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21477616.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Muratore, M., Tuena, C., Pedroli, E., Cipresso, P., & Riva, G. (2019). Virtual reality as a new tool for the assessment of self-awareness. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00062.
  38. Oliveira, E. C. D., Bertrand, P., Lesur, M. E. R., Palomo, P., Demarzo, M., Cebolla, A., … Tori, R. (2016). Virtual body swap: A new feasible tool to be explored in health and education. Paper presented at the 2016 XVIII Symposium on Virtual and Augmented Reality (SVR), 21–24 June 2016.Google Scholar
  39. Perez-Marcos, D., Slater, M., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2009). Inducing a virtual hand ownership illusion through a brain-computer interface. Neuroreport, 20(6), 589–594. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19938302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Petkova, V. I., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2008). If I were you: Perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS One, 3(12), e3832. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19050755.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003832.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Quesnel, D., & Riecke, B. E. (2018). Are you awed yet? How virtual reality gives us awe and goose bumps. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2158. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30473673.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02158.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Repetto, C., Gorini, A., Algeri, D., Vigna, C., Gaggioli, A., & Riva, G. (2009). The use of biofeedback in clinical virtual reality: The intrepid project. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 144, 128–132. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19592748.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Riva, G. (2008). From virtual to real body: Virtual reality as embodied technology. Journal of Cybertherapy and Rehabiliation, 1(1), 7–22.Google Scholar
  44. Riva, G. (2014). Phenomenology of positive change: Personal growth. In P. Inghilleri, G. Riva, & E. Riva (Eds.), Enabling positive change. Flow and complexity in daily experience (pp. 15–28). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  45. Riva, G. (2016). Embodied medicine: What human-computer confluence can offer to health care. In A. Gaggioli, A. Ferscha, G. Riva, S. Dunne, & I. Viaud-Delmon (Eds.), Human computer confluence: Transforming human experience through symbiotic technologies (pp. 55–79). Warsaw: De Gruyter Open.Google Scholar
  46. Riva, G. (2018). The neuroscience of body memory: From the self through the space to the others. Cortex, 104, 241–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.07.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Riva, G., & Mantovani, F. (2014). Extending the self through the tools and the others: A general framework for presence and social presence in mediated interactions. In G. Riva, J. A. Waterworth, & D. Murray (Eds.), Interacting with presence: HCI and the sense of presence in computer-mediated environments (pp. 12–34). Berlin: De Gruyter Open – Online. www.presence-research.com.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Riva, G., Castelnuovo, G., & Mantovani, F. (2006). Transformation of flow in rehabilitation: The role of advanced communication technologies. Behavior Research Methods, 38(2), 237–244. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=16956100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Riva, G., Banos, R. M., Botella, C., Wiederhold, B. K., & Gaggioli, A. (2012). Positive technology: Using interactive technologies to promote positive functioning. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15(2), 69–77. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22149077.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2011.0139.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Riva, G., Botella, C., Baños, R., Mantovani, F., García-Palacios, A., Quero, S., … Gaggioli, A. (2015). Presence-inducing media for mental health applications. In M. Lombard, F. Biocca, J. Freeman, W. Ijsselsteijn, & R. J. Schaevitz (Eds.), Immersed in media (pp. 283–332). New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  51. Riva, G., Baños, R. M., Botella, C., Mantovani, F., & Gaggioli, A. (2016). Transforming experience: The potential of augmented reality and virtual reality for enhancing personal and clinical change. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 7(164).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00164.
  52. Riva, G., Serino, S., Di Lernia, D., Pavone, E. F., & Dakanalis, A. (2017). Embodied medicine: Mens sana in corpore virtuale sano. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11(120).  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00120.
  53. Riva, G., Wiederhold, B., Chirico, A., Di Lernia, D., Mantovani, F., & Gaggioli, A. (2018). Brain and virtual reality: What do they have in common and how to exploit their potential. Annual Review of Cybertherapy and Telemedicine, 16, 3–7.Google Scholar
  54. Riva, G., Wiederhold, B. K., & Mantovani, F. (2019). Neuroscience of virtual reality: From virtual exposure to embodied medicine. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 22(1), 82–96. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30183347.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.29099.gri.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Rizzo, A. S., Difede, J., Rothbaum, B. O., Reger, G., Spitalnick, J., Cukor, J., & McLay, R. (2010). Development and early evaluation of the Virtual Iraq/Afghanistan exposure therapy system for combat-related PTSD. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1208, 114–125. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20955333.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05755.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Sanchez-Vives, M. V., & Slater, M. (2005). From presence to consciousness through virtual reality. Nature Review Neuroscience, 6(4), 332–339. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=15803164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schultheis, M. T., & Rizzo, A. A. (2001). The application of virtual reality technology in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 46(3), 296–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Serino, S., Pedroli, E., Keizer, A., Triberti, S., Dakanalis, A., Pallavicini, F., … Riva, G. (2016). Virtual reality body swapping: A tool for modifying the allocentric memory of the body. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 19(2), 127–133. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26506136.  https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Slater, M., Perez-Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H. H., & Sanchez-Vives, M. V. (2009). Inducing illusory ownership of a virtual body. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 3(2), 214–220. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=20011144.  https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.01.029.2009.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Suzuki, K., Garfinkel, S. N., Critchley, H. D., & Seth, A. K. (2013). Multisensory integration across exteroceptive and interoceptive domains modulates self-experience in the rubber-hand illusion. Neuropsychologia, 51(13), 2909–2917. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23993906.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.014.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Talsma, D. (2015). Predictive coding and multisensory integration: An attentional account of the multisensory mind. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 9, 19. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25859192.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2015.00019.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 80–91. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15709864.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Vincelli, F., Molinari, E., & Riva, G. (2001). Virtual reality as clinical tool: Immersion and three-dimensionality in the relationship between patient and therapist. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 81, 551–553. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/htbin-post/Entrez/query?db=m&form=6&dopt=r&uid=11317807.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Ward, J., & Meijer, P. (2010). Visual experiences in the blind induced by an auditory sensory substitution device. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 492–500. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053810009001718.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2009.10.006.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Waterworth, J. A., & Waterworth, E. L. (2014). Altered, expanded and distributed embodiment: The three stages of interactive presence. In G. Riva, J. A. Waterworth, & D. Murray (Eds.), Interacting with presence: HCI and the sense of presence in computer-mediated environments (pp. 36–50). Berlin: De Gruyter Open – Online. www.presence-research.com.Google Scholar
  66. Wilson, M. (2006). Covert Imitation, in G. Knoblich, I. M. Thornton, M. Grosjean & M. Shiffrar (a cura di), Human body perception from the inside out, New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 211–228.Google Scholar
  67. Wolfe, B. E. (2002). The role of lived experience in self- and relational observation: A commentary on Horowitz (2002). Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 12(2), 147–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Applied Technology for Neuro-Psychology LabIRCCS Istituto Auxologico ItalianoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo GemelliMilanItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Alice Chirico
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCatholic University of the Sacred Heart in MilanMilanItaly