Climate Change Adaptation Through Science-Farmer-Policy Dialogue in Mali

  • Lin BautzeEmail author
  • Gian L. Nicolay
  • Matthias Meier
  • Andreas Gattinger
  • Adrian Muller
Reference work entry


Climate change increases the number of risks for agricultural production in arid and semiarid regions, especially in Western Africa. Smallholder farmers are particularly vulnerable to climate change risks. These risks affect their socioeconomic situation, as well as the local food sector value chain in general. Therefore, their food security is threatened if smallholder farming structures do not adapt to them. Thus, effective climate change adaptation measures for smallholders are essential and should be implemented without delay. However, success hinges on the acceptance of the promoted measures among various stakeholders. Thus, their acceptance needs to be assessed before promoting.

The project “The potential of sustainable land-use systems to promote adaptation to climate change” analyzes climate change adaptation measures to increase the resilience of smallholders in drought-prone regions of West Africa. This chapter shows the project results of the science-farmer-policy dialogue established in this project, moderated by interdisciplinary researchers and the innovation platform established in Southern Mali. Particular emphasis is given on how effective climate change adaptation measures (both technical and institutional) can be selected in a participatory process with smallholders’ groups as well as taking into account the institutional context within the involved region. Additionally, the project explores how insights from farmers’ groups and extensionists can be utilized and disseminated via innovation platform-based processes and how the latter may serve to identify and develop new solutions. Through innovation platforms, other stakeholders like extensionists, researchers, value chain operators, farmer organizations, and policy makers can support the resilience of smallholders’ farms. Therefore, this chapter presents lessons learned from the process of establishing innovation platforms in Mali. It is essential to learn and exchange these experiences with other farmers, farmer groups, researchers, and policy makers in drought-prone regions to further develop this concept as a practical solution for climate change adaptation in the area.


Climate change adaptation Small-scale farming Innovation platforms Policy advice Mali 



The funding by the Mercator Foundation Switzerland is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. Bautze L, Meier M, Muller A, Gattinger A (in preparation) The potential of agroforestry systems as a climate change adaptation strategy for (smallholder) farmers in Western Africa: a meta-analysis on the nutrient use efficiency (NUE) and additional co-benefits. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), FrickGoogle Scholar
  2. Business Dictionary (2017) Definition of proxy indicator. WebFinance Inc., Fairfax (U.S.). Accessed 19 June 2017
  3. Doumbia S, Sidibé S, Sanogo S, Sissoko F, Glin L, Samaké O (2016) Capacité et pratique d’adaption au Changement Climatique des agriculteurs des communes de Boura et Kléla au Mali Sud. Rapport Final. IER et FiBL. SikassoGoogle Scholar
  4. FAO (2017) The state of food insecurity in the world, 2015. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome. Accessed 17 June 2017Google Scholar
  5. Gattinger A et al (2012) Enhanced top soil carbon stocks under organic farming. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:18226–18231. Scholar
  6. Gattinger A, Meier M, Muller A (in preparation) The impact of organic farming systems on water and nutrient use efficiency. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), FrickGoogle Scholar
  7. Kebe D, Fomba B, Sidibé MC, Djouara H (1999) Le conseil de gestion aux exploitations agricoles: un outil de vulgarisation. Ministère du développement rural et de l’eau. IER. ESPGRN, SikassoGoogle Scholar
  8. Meier M, Heubeck C, Muller A, Gattinger A (in preparation) Nutrient- and water-use efficiency of agricultural practices in West Africa – a meta-analysis. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), FrickGoogle Scholar
  9. Mersmann F, Wehnert T, Göpel M, Arens S, Ujj O (2014) Shifting paradigms: unpacking transformation for climate action. A guidebook for climate finance & development practitioners. Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy GmbH, Berlin. Available via Accessed 17 June 2017Google Scholar
  10. Niang I, Ruppel OC, Abdrabo MA, Essel A, Lennard C, Padgham J, Urquhart P (2014) Africa. In: Barros VR et al (eds) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part B: regional aspects. Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New York, pp 1199–1265Google Scholar
  11. Nicolay G (2016) Theory-based innovation platform management. A contribution of sociology to agriculture research and development. Paper presented at the 12th European IFSA symposium, 2016. Theme 2: methodology and frameworks of farming systems transformation, Harper Adams University, UK, 12–17 July 2016Google Scholar
  12. Nicolay GL, Dabire R, Fliessbach A, Glin L, Sissoko F (2013) Syprobio: farmer-led innovation platforms to address food security, poverty alleviation and resilience to climate change in West African cotton-growing communities. Paper presented at the workshop on agricultural innovation Systems in Africa (AISA), Nairobi, 29–31 May 2013Google Scholar
  13. Pedercini M, Kanamaru H, Derwisch S (2012) Potential impacts of climate change on food security in Mali. Natural Resources Management and Environment Department at the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome. Available via Accessed 17 June 2017
  14. Schut M et al (2015) Innovation platforms: experiences with their institutional embedding in agricultural research for development. Exp Agric 52:537–561. Scholar
  15. Schütz L, Gattinger A, Meier M, Müller A, Boller T, Mäder P, Mathimaran N (2018) Improving crop yield and nutrient use efficiency via biofertilization – a global meta-analysis. Front Plant Sci 8:2204. Scholar
  16. UNdata (2017) A world of information. United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD), New York. Accessed 17 June 2017
  17. WB (2017) Climate change knowledge portal – for development practicioners and policy makers. The World Bank Group, New York. Accessed 17 June 2017Google Scholar
  18. WMO (2017) WMO programmes: world weather information service – official forecasts. United Nations World Meterological Organisation (WMO), New York. Accessed 17 June 2017Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lin Bautze
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gian L. Nicolay
    • 2
  • Matthias Meier
    • 3
  • Andreas Gattinger
    • 4
  • Adrian Muller
    • 5
  1. 1.Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL)Frankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.Department of International CooperationResearch Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL)FrickSwitzerland
  3. 3.Department of Socio-Economic SciencesResearch Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL)FrickSwitzerland
  4. 4.Faculty 9 – Agricultural Sciences, Nutritional Sciences, and Environmental ManagementJustus Liebig University (JLU), Institute of Agronomy and Plant Breeding IIGießenGermany
  5. 5.Department of Socio-Economic SciencesResearch Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL)FrickSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations