Advertisement

Balancing Adaptation and Mitigation in the Building Sector of New York State

  • Yasmein OkourEmail author
  • Nicholas B. Rajkovich
  • Martha Bohm
Reference work entry

Abstract

Climate change poses a significant threat to commercial and residential buildings. New buildings must be designed, and existing buildings retrofitted, to be resilient to extreme weather and sea level rise. At the same time, designers and building owners need to address energy consumption because the building stock uses nearly 40% of all energy in the United States. Building professionals will shape how the building stock responds to climate change. However, despite their critical role, few studies have examined how these professionals balance increasing the resilience of the built environment with greenhouse gas emission reduction efforts. To address this gap, data from 42 semi-structured interviews and an online survey were analyzed. The research focused on the response of New York State building professionals. Results indicate that building professionals are aware of potential climate impacts. However, their understanding of climate impacts are framed by where they live. In addition, while climate change is a concern, these building professionals tend to focus on energy efficiency rather than climate-related resilience. This is potentially due to a lack of information, outdated building codes, a lack of resources, and limited support from their clients.

Keywords

Adaptation Energy efficiency Building sector Climate change Mitigation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the New York State Energy Research and Development Authority.

References

  1. Atkinson R, Flint J (2001) Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: snowball research strategies. Soc Res Updat 33(1):1–4Google Scholar
  2. Bazeley P (2007) Qualitative data analysis with NVivo, 2nd edn. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bloch A (2007) Methodological challenges for national and multi-sited comparative survey research. J Refug Stud 20(2):230–247.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brennan T (2010) Indoor environmental quality and climate change. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Coley D, Kershaw T, Eames M (2012) A comparison of structural and behavioural adaptations to future proofing buildings against higher temperatures. Build Environ 55:159–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.12.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Creswell JW (2014) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, vol 4. SAGE, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  7. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL (2011) Designing and conducting mixed methods research, 2nd edn. SAGE, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  8. Dubois B, Krasny ME (2016) Educating with resilience in mind: Addressing climate change in post-Sandy New York City. J Environ Educ 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1167004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ekstrom JA, Moser, SC, Tom M (2011) Barriers to climate change adaption: a diagnostic framework: final project report. California Energy Commission, Sacramento, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  10. Field RW (2010) Climate change and indoor air quality. Retrieved 15 June 2012Google Scholar
  11. Gordon AD (2013) Disposable infrastructure including relocatable buildings: adapting to climate change. Aust J Water Resour 17(2):152–160.  https://doi.org/10.7158/W13-030.2013.17.2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hammer SA, Parshall L, Leichenko R, Vancura P, Panero M (2011) Energy. In: Rosenzweig C, Solecki W, DeGaetano A, O’Grady M, Hassol S, Grabhorn P (eds) Responding to climate change in New York state: the ClimAID integrated assessment for effective climate change adaptation. New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, AlbanyGoogle Scholar
  13. Hasegawa T (2004) Climate change, adaptation and government policy for the building sector. Build Res Inform 32(1):61–64.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321032000148488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hertin J, Berkhout F, Gann D, Barlow J (2003) Climate change and the UK house building sector: perceptions, impacts and adaptive capacity. Build Res Inform 31(3–4):278–290.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0961321032000097683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IOM (2011) Climate change, the indoor environment, and health. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  16. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  17. Kuzel A (1992) Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In: Crabtree BF, Miller WL (eds) Doing qualitative research, vol 3. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  18. Lucon O, Ürge-Vorsatz D, Ahmed AZ, Akbari H, Bertoldi P, Cabeza LF, … Vilariño MV (2014) Buildings. In: Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Kriemann B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, Stechow C v, Zwickel T, Minx JC (eds) Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  19. Mendelsohn R (2000) Efficient adaptation to climate change. Clim Chang 45(3):583–600.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005507810350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Morse JM (1991) Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nurs Res 40(2):120–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Morton TA, Bretschneider P, Coley D, Kershaw T (2011) Building a better future: an exploration of beliefs about climate change and perceived need for adaptation within the building industry. Build Environ 46(5):1151–1158.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.12.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moser SC, Ekstrom JA (2010) A framework to diagnose barriers to climate change adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(51):22026–22031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. NRC (2009) National Research Council: informing decisions in a changing climate. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  24. PlaNYC (2013) PlaNYC: a stronger, more resilient New York. Retrieved from http://www.nyc.gov/html/planyc/html/about/about.shtml
  25. Richards L (2009) Handling qualitative data: a practical guide, vol 2nd. SAGE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  26. Roaf S, Crichton D, Nicol F (2009) Adapting buildings and cities for climate change: a 21st century survival guide, 2nd edn. Architectural Press, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  27. Saldaña J (2013) The coding manual for qualitative researchers, vol 2. SAGE, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  28. Schmeltz MT, González SK, Fuentes L, Kwan A, Ortega-Williams A, Cowan LP (2013) Lessons from hurricane sandy: a community response in Brooklyn, New York. J Urban Health 90(5):799–809.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-013-9832-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott MJ, Huang YJ (2007) Effects of climate change on energy use in the United States. In: T. S. o. G. C. Research (ed) Effects of climate change on energy production and use in the United States. Climate Change Science Program, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  30. Smit B, Burton I, Klein RJT, Wandel J (2000) An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Clim Chang 45(1):223–251.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005661622966CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Strauss AL (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK/New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasmein Okour
    • 2
    Email author
  • Nicholas B. Rajkovich
    • 1
  • Martha Bohm
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Architecture and PlanningState University of New York at BuffaloBuffaloUSA
  2. 2.Department of City Planning and DesignJordan University of Science and TechnologyIrbidJordan

Personalised recommendations