Advertisement

Prostitution and Sex Work in an Online Context

  • Christine MilrodEmail author
  • Martin Monto
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of sex work in an online context, exploring the history and progression of discussion boards and review websites catering to male customers who interact with female sex workers online to purchase sexual encounters.

The various online sex markets are investigated in detail, presenting data from three studies of customers in the United States, as well as documenting recent legal challenges to both buyers and sellers of paid sex. The chapter also presents a comparison of the online behaviors of both customers and men who choose not to purchase sex. Differing marketing strategies of independent sex workers are described in their approaches to having a greater stake in the post FOSTA-SESTA (Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act-Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act) online environment, where the attempt to impede the selling of sexual services has been fueled by website shutdowns, arrests, and prison sentences, intended to serve as a deterrent to human trafficking.

Keywords

Sex work Prostitution Online Customers Sexual markets Websites Internet GFE Hobbyist 

References

  1. AIMGroup. (2010). Backpage replaces Craigslist as prostitution-ad leader. Retrieved from https://aimgroup.com/2010/10/19/backpage-replaces-craigslist-as-prostitution-ad-leader/
  2. American Association of Sexuality Educators, Counselors & Therapists. (2018). Position on FOSTA-SESTA and its impact on consensual sex work and the chilling of sexual speech. Retrieved from https://www.aasect.org/position-fosta-sesta-and-its-impact-consensual-sex-work-and-chilling-sexual-speech
  3. Assembly Four. (2019). Retrieved from https://assemblyfour.com
  4. Bernstein, E. (2007). Buying and selling the girlfriend experience: The social and subjective contours of market intimacy. In M. Padilla, J. Hirsch, M. Muñoz-Laboy, R. Sember, & R. Parker (Eds.), Love and globalization: Transformers of intimacy in the contemporary world (pp. 186–202). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blevins, K. R., & Holt, T. J. (2009). Examining the virtual subculture of johns. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 38, 619–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brents, B. G., Reed, J. J., & Jackson, C. A. (2017). Strange confluences: Radical feminism and evangelical Christianity as drivers of US neo-abolitionism. In E. Ward & G. Wylie (Eds.), Feminism, prostitution and the state (pp. 66–85). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Brooks, A. (2012). Verified vs. reviewed. Retrieved from http://www.texasgoldengirl.com/afterhours/verified-escorts/
  8. Calida, P. (2018). They think they have a PhD in whoreology: How lobbying for sex worker rights helps educate us all. Retrieved from https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/kzkxxn/sex-work-lobby-day-washington-dc-phoenix-calida
  9. Castle, T., & Lee, J. (2008). Ordering sex in cyberspace: A content analysis of escort websites. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 11, 107–121.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877907086395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark-Flory, T. (2018). Facing SESTA and political threats, sex worker organizations brace for fallout. Retrieved from https://theslot.jezebel.com/facing-sesta-and-political-threats-sex-worker-organiza-1824257817
  11. Congress.gov. (2000, Oct.28) H.R. 3244, Public Law No: 106–386-Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act. https://www.congress.gov/106/plaws/publ386/PLAW-106publ386.pdf
  12. Cunningham, S., & Kendall, T. D. (2011). Prostitution 2.0: The changing face of sex work. Journal of Urban Economics, 69, 273–287.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2010.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dart v. Craigslist. (2009). 665 F. Supp. 2d 961 (Dist Court ND, Illinois). Retrieved from http://pub.bna.com/eclr/dartvcraigslist.pdf
  14. Data Protection Authority. (2019). Retrieved from https://www.personuvernd.is/information-in-english/
  15. Demand Abolition. (2018). Key facts about preventing trafficking victimization through “demand reduction”. Retrieved from https://www.demandabolition.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Demand_Buyer_Fact_Sheet.062017.pdf
  16. Doherty, Y. K., & Harris, A. (2015). The social construction of trafficked persons: An analysis of the UN protocol and the TVPA definitions. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 26(1), 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dworkin, A. (1997). Life and death. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Eros.com (2019). Terms and conditions of use. Retrieved from https://www.eros.com/disclaimer/terms#03
  19. Facebook.com (2018). Sexual solicitation. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/communitystandards/sexual_solicitation
  20. Holt, T., & Blevins, K. (2007). Examining sex work from the customer’s perspective: Assessing johns using on-line data. Deviant Behavior, 28, 333–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horswill, A., & Weitzer, R. (2018). Becoming a client: The socialization of novice buyers of sexual services. Deviant Behavior, 39, 148–158.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1263083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hunt, S. (2013, September 28). Deconstructing demand: The driving force of sex trafficking. Retrieved from https://www.demandabolition.org/news/deconstructing-demand-driving-force-sex-trafficking/
  23. Internet World Stats. (2017). Internet usage statistics. Retrieved from http://www.internetworldstats.com
  24. Kern, R. (2001). Where’s the action? Criminal motivations among prostitute customers. Doctoral dissertation, Vanderbilt University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 61 (12), 4956A (UMI No. 9996255).Google Scholar
  25. Laumann, E., Gagnon, J., Michael, R., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  26. MacKinnon, C. A. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press.Google Scholar
  27. Mastodon.org (2019). Retrieved from https://joinmastodon.org
  28. Miller, J., & Schwartz, M. D. (1995). Rape myths and violence against street prostitutes. Deviant Behavior, 16, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Miller, E., Romenesko, K., & Wondolkowski, L. (1993). The United States. In N. J. Davis (Ed.), Prostitution – An international handbook (pp. 300–326). Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  30. Milrod, C. (2016). On the erotic highway: A participant-observer approach to researching users of a prostitute review website. In T. J. Holt (Ed.), Crime on-line (3rd ed., pp. 173–198). Durham: Carolina Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Milrod, C., & Monto, M. (2012). The hobbyist and the girlfriend experience: Behaviors and preferences of male customers of internet sexual services providers. Deviant Behavior, 33, 792–810.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2012.707502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Milrod, C., & Monto, M. (2016). Older male clients of female sex workers in the United States. Archives of Sexual Behavior.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0733-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Milrod, C., & Weitzer, R. (2012). The intimacy prism: Emotion management among the clients of escorts. Men and Masculinities, 15, 447–467.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X12452148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Monto, M. (1998). Holding men accountable for prostitution: The unique approach of the Sexual Exploitation Education Project (SEEP). Violence Against Women, 4, 505–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Monto, M. (1999). Focusing on the customers of street prostitutes: A creative approach to reducing violence against women – Final report. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/182860.pdf
  36. Monto, M., & McRee, N. (2005). A comparison of the male customers of female street prostitutes with national samples of men. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 505–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Monto, M., & Milrod, C. (2013). Ordinary or peculiar men? Comparing the customers of sex works with a nationally representative sample of men. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 58, 802–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Motyl, J. (2013). Trading sex for college tuition: How sugar daddy dating sites may be sugar coating prostitution. Penn State Law Review, 117, 927–957.Google Scholar
  39. Raymond, J. G. (1998). Prostitution as violence against women: NGO stonewalling in Beijing and elsewhere. Women’s Studies International Forum, 21(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusions of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sanders, T. (2008). Paying for pleasure: Men who buy sex. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  42. Smith, T. W., Marsden, P. V., & Hout, M. General Social Survey, 1972–2010 [Cumulative File] (ICPSR31521-v1). Storrs: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut/Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [Distributors],  https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR31521.v1
  43. State Attorneys General (2010). Re: Adult services section of Craigslist. Retrieved from https://themarginalized.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/craigslist-joint-letter-from-attorneys-general.pdf
  44. State of Washington, v. Peters and Emmanuel 16-C-00154-54 SEA. (2018). State’s trial memorandum.Google Scholar
  45. Stone, B. (2009). Craigslist expands coverage of cities by 25 percent. New York Times. Retrieved from https://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/21/craigslist-expands-coverage-of-cities-by-25-percent/
  46. Twitter.com. (2019). Twitter media policy. Retrieved from https://help.twitter.com/en/rules-and-policies/media-policy
  47. U.S. Government Publishing Office. (2018). H.R.1865, Public Law No: 115–164 (04/11/2018). Retrieved from https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1865/text
  48. United States of America vs. Lacey et al. (2018). Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/file/1050276/download
  49. Weitzer, R. (2006). Moral Crusade against prostitution. Society, 43(3), 33–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ScholarLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.University of PortlandPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations