Advertisement

Applying the Techniques of Neutralization to the Study of Cybercrime

  • Russell BrewerEmail author
  • Sarah Fox
  • Caitlan Miller
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Cybercrime scholars have used a wide range of criminological theories to understand crime and deviance within digital contexts. Among the most frequently cited theoretical frameworks used in this space has been the techniques of neutralization, first proposed by Gresham Sykes and David Matza. This body of work has demonstrated the myriad ways that individual cyber-delinquents have applied the techniques of neutralization as a justification for their deviance. A thorough review of this research reveals decidedly mixed support for neutralization theory. This chapter provides an in-depth review of these studies and seeks to account for this mixed result. This is done by chronicling the methodological underpinnings of this work, and in doing so highlights the challenges facing this literature with respect to the conceptualization and measurement of Sykes and Matza’s theory in the cyber realm. This is accomplished in two parts. First, we review the body of literature that analyzes the techniques of neutralization as a single combined construct (i.e., items are combined to produce a single measure of neutralization), and flag some of the advantages, but also pitfalls of this approach. Second, we review the treatment of individual techniques of neutralization as distinct constructs within the literature (i.e., a technique is measured and analyzed separate to others) and detail some of the common methodological hurdles encountered by researchers. The chapter concludes by elaborating on persistent gaps or challenges posed in making such assessments and proposes a path forward for future cybercrime research incorporating this framework.

Keywords

Techniques of neutralization Sykes and Matza 

References

  1. Akers, R. L. (2009). The social learning theory of criminal and deviant behavior. In Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Brewer, R., Cale, J., Goldsmith, A., & Holt, T. (2018). Young people, the internet, and emerging pathways into criminality: A study of Australian adolescents. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 12(1), 115–132.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, S. C. (2016). Where do beliefs about music piracy come from and how are they shared? International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 10(1), 21–39.Google Scholar
  4. Brunton-Smith, I., & McCarthy, D. J. (2016). Explaining young people’s involvement in online piracy: An empirical assessment using the offending crime and justice survey in England and Wales. Victims & Offenders, 11(4), 509–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryan, A. (2014). Digital piracy: Neutralising piracy on the digital waves. Plymouth Law and Criminal Justice Review, 6(1), 214–235.Google Scholar
  6. Burruss, G. W., Bossler, A. M., & Holt, T. J. (2012). Assessing the mediation of a fuller social learning model on low self control’s influence on software piracy. Crime & Delinquency, 59(8), 1157–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chua, Y. T., & Holt, T. J. (2016). A cross-national examination of the techniques of neutralization to account for hacking behaviors. Victims & Offenders, 11(4), 534–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. W. (1985). The criminal elite: The sociology of white collar crime. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  9. Copes, H. (2003). Societal attachments, offending frequency, and techniques of neutralization. Deviant Behavior, 24(2), 101–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cromwell, P., & Thurman, Q. (2003). The devil made me do it: Use of neutralizations by shoplifters. Deviant Behavior, 24(6), 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. D’Ovidio, R., Mitman, T., El-Burkia, I. J., & Shumar, W. (2009). Adult-child sex advocacy websites as social learning environments: A content analysis. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3(1), 421–440.Google Scholar
  12. Durkin, K. F., & Bryant, C. D. (1999). Propagandizing pederasty: A thematic analysis of the on-line exculpatory accounts of unrepentant pedophiles. Deviant Behavior, 20(2), 103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldsmith, A., & Brewer, R. (2015). Digital drift and the criminal interaction order. Theoretical Criminology, 19(1), 112–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goode, S., & Cruise, S. (2006). What motivates software crackers? Journal of Business Ethics, 65(2), 173–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrington, S. J. (1996). The effect of codes of ethics and personal denial of responsibility on computer abuse judgments and intentions. MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Harris, L. C., & Dumas, A. (2009). Online consumer misbehaviour: An application of neutralization theory. Marketing Theory, 9(4), 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Henry, S. (1990). Degrees of deviance: Student accounts of their deviant behaviour. Salem: Sheffield Publishing.Google Scholar
  18. Higgins, G. E., Wolfe, S. E., & Marcum, C. D. (2008). Music piracy and neutralization: A preliminary trajectory analysis from short-term longitudinal data. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 2(2), 324–336.Google Scholar
  19. Hinduja, S. (2007). Neutralization theory and online software piracy. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(1), 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holt, T. J., & Copes, H. (2010). Transferring subcultural knowledge on-line: Practices and beliefs of persistent digital pirates. Deviant Behavior, 31(7), 625–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Holt, T. J., & Morris, R. G. (2009). An exploration of the relationship between MP3 player ownership and digital piracy. Criminal Justice Studies, 22(4), 381–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holt, T. J., Burruss, G. W., & Bossler, A. M. (2010). Social learning and cyber-deviance: Examining the importance of a full social learning model in the virtual world. Journal of Crime and Justice, 33(2), 31–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holt, T. J., Brewer, R., & Goldsmith, A. (2019). Digital drift and the “sense of injustice”: Counter-productive policing of youth cybercrime. Deviant Behavior, 40(9), 1144–1156.Google Scholar
  24. Hutchings, A. (2013). Hacking and fraud: Qualitative analysis of online offending and victimization. In Global criminology: Crime and victimization in a globalized era (pp. 93–114). Boca Raton: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hutchings, A., & Clayton, R. (2016). Exploring the provision of online Booter services. Deviant Behavior, 37(10), 1163–1178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hwang, J., Lee, H., Kim, K., Zo, H., & Ciganek, A. P. (2016). Cyber neutralisation and flaming. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35(3), 210–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ingram, J. R., & Hinduja, S. (2008). Neutralizing music piracy: An empirical examination. Deviant Behavior, 29(4), 334–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kettleborough, D. G., & Merdian, H. L. (2017). Gateway to offending behaviour: Permission-giving thoughts of online users of child sexual exploitation material. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 23(1), 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Klockars, C. B. (1974). The professional fence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. Kos Koklic, M., Kukar-Kinney, M., & Vida, I. (2016). Three-level mechanism of consumer digital piracy: Development and cross-cultural validation. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(1), 15–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lowry, P. B., Zhang, J., Wang, C., & Siponen, M. (2016). Why do adults engage in cyberbullying on social media? An integration of online disinhibition and deindividuation effects with the social structure and social learning model. Information Systems Research, 27(4), 962–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. MacNeill, K. (2017). Torrenting game of thrones: So wrong and yet so right. Convergence, 23(5), 545–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Maratea, R. J. (2011). Screwing the pooch: Legitimizing accounts in a zoophilia on-line community. Deviant Behavior, 32(10), 918–943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marcum, C. D., Higgins, G. E., Wolfe, S. E., & Ricketts, M. L. (2011). Examining the intersection of self-control, peer association and neutralization in explaining digital piracy. Western Criminology Review, 12(3), 60–74.Google Scholar
  35. Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/pubs/books/431645A
  36. Maruna, S. (2004). Desistance from crime and explanatory style: A new direction in the psychology of reform. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 20(2), 184–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maruna, S., & Copes, H. (2005). What have we learned from five decades of neutralization research? Crime and Justice, 32, 221–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Matza, D. (1964). Delinquency and drift. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  39. Minor, W. W. (1981). Techniques of neutralization: A reconceptualization and empirical examination. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 18(2), 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore, R., & McMullan, E. C. (2009). Neutralizations and rationalizations of digital piracy: A qualitative analysis of university students. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 3(1), 441–451.Google Scholar
  41. Morris, R. G. (2011). Computer hacking and the techniques of neutralization: An empirical assessment. In T. J. Holt & B. H. Schell (Eds.), Corporate hacking and technology-driven crime: Social dynamics and implications (pp. 1–17). Hershey: Information Science Reference.Google Scholar
  42. Morris, R. G., & Higgins, G. E. (2009). Neutralizing potential and self-reported digital piracy: A multitheoretical exploration among college undergraduates. Criminal Justice Review, 34(2), 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Halloran, E., & Quayle, E. (2010). A content analysis of a “boy love” support forum: Revisiting Durkin and Bryant. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 16(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Renfrow, D. G., & Rollo, E. A. (2014). Sexting on campus: Minimizing perceived risks and neutralizing behaviors. Deviant Behavior, 35(11), 903–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Siponen, M., Vance, A., & Willison, R. (2012). New insights into the problem of software piracy: The effects of neutralization, shame, and moral beliefs. Information & Management, 49(7), 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Smallridge, J. L., & Roberts, J. R. (2013). Crime specific neutralizations: An empirical examination of four types of digital piracy. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 7(2), 125–140.Google Scholar
  47. Steinmetz, K. F., & Tunnell, K. D. (2013). Under the pixelated Jolly Roger: A study of on-line pirates. Deviant Behavior, 34(1), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Thongmak, M. (2017). Ethics, neutralization and digital piracy. International Journal of Electronic Commerce Studies, 8(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  50. Ulsperger, J. S., Hodges, S. H., & Paul, J. (2010). Pirates on the plank: Neutralization theory and the criminal downloading of music among generation Y in the era of late modernity. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture, 17(1), 124–151.Google Scholar
  51. Vandiver, D. M., Bowman, S., & Vega, A. (2012). Music piracy among college students: An examination of low self-control, techniques of neutralization, and rational choice. The Southwest Journal of Criminal Justice, 8(2), 76–95.Google Scholar
  52. Vida, I., Kos Koklič, M., Kukar-Kinney, M., & Penz, E. (2012). Predicting consumer digital piracy behavior: The role of rationalization and perceived consequences. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 6(4), 298–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vysotsky, S., & McCarthy, A. L. (2017). Normalizing cyberracism: A neutralization theory analysis. Journal of Crime and Justice, 40(4), 446–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yu, S. (2012). College students’ justification for digital piracy: A mixed methods study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(4), 364–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yu, S. (2013). Digital piracy justification: Asian students versus American students. International Criminal Justice Review, 23(2), 185–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhang, S., & Leidner, D. (2018). From improper to acceptable: How perpetrators neutralize workplace bullying behaviors in the cyber world. Information & Management, 55(7), 850–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhang, S., Yu, L., Wakefield, R. L., & Leidner, D. (2016). Friend or foe: Cyberbullying in social network sites. The Database for Advances in Information Systems, 47(1), 51–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations