Encyclopedia of Social Insects

Living Edition
| Editors: Christopher K. Starr

Brood Stimulation Hypothesis

  • Kaitlin M. BaudierEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90306-4_16-1


Brood stimulation theory

A distinctive feature of the colony cycle in some army ants is an alternation between a nomadic phase in which the colony emigrates frequently and a statary phase in which the colony remains in place for longer periods. During an emigration the workers carry brood to a new temporary nesting site known as a “bivouac” (Fig. 1). The transition from the statary to the nomadic phase was previously supposed to be a simple, direct result of exhaustion of the local food supply. Against this, it was originally proposed by Theodore C. Schneirla that transitions between phases are triggered by developmental changes in the colony’s synchronous brood, rather than environmental circumstances or an endogenous rhythm of the adult ants (the brood stimulation hypothesis; [8, 9]). Schneirla suggested that hungry, simultaneously hatching larvae abruptly increase the colony’s demand for food, signaling adult workers to forage and emigrate frequently in order to avoid...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. 1.
    Baudier, K. M., D’Amelio, C., Sulger, E., O’Connor, M., & O’Donnel, S. (2019). Plastic collective endothermy in a complex animal society (army ant bivouacs: Eciton burchellii parvispinum). Ecography, 42, 730–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baudier, K. M., & O’Donnell, S. (2016). Structure and thermal biology of subterranean army ant bivouacs in tropical montane forests. Insectes Sociaux, 63, 467–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chandra, V., Fetter-Pruneda, I., Oxley, P. R., Ritger, A. L., McKenzie, S. K., et al. (2018). Social regulation of insulin signaling and the evolution of eusociality in ants. Science, 361, 398–402.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fowler, H. G. (1979). Notes on Labidus praedator (Fr. Smith) in Paraguay (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Dorylinae: Ecitonini). Journal of Natural History, 13, 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Franks, N. R. (1989). Thermal regulation in army ant bivouacs. Physiological Entomology, 14, 397–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kronauer, D. J. (2009). Recent advances in army ant biology (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Myrmecological News, 12, 51–65.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rettenmeyer, C. W. (1963). Behavioral studies of army ants. University of Kansas Science Bulletin, 44, 281–465.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schneirla, T. (1950). The relationship between observation and experimentation in the field study of behavior. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 51, 1022–1044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schneirla, T. C. (1971). Army ants: A study in social organization. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. 349 pp.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schneirla, T. C., Brown, R. Z., & Brown, F. C. (1954). The bivouac or temporary nest as an adaptive factor in certain terrestrial species of army ants. Ecological Monographs, 24, 269–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Topoff, H., Mirenda, J., Droual, R., & Herrick, S. (1980). Onset of the nomadic phase in the army ant Neivamyrmex nigrescens (Cresson) (Hym. Form.): Distinguishing between callow and larval excitation by brood substitution. Insectes Sociaux, 27, 175–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ulrich, Y., Burns, D., Libbrecht, R., & Kronauer, D. J. (2016). Ant larvae regulate worker foraging behavior and ovarian activity in a dose-dependent manner. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 70, 1011–1018.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    von Beeren, C., Maruyama, M., & Kronauer, D. J. (2016). Cryptic diversity, high host specificity and reproductive synchronization in army ant-associated Vatesus beetles. Molecular Ecology, 25, 990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wang, Y. J., & Happ, G. M. (1974). Larval development during the nomadic phase of a nearctic army ant, Neivamyrmex nigrescens (Cresson) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). International Journal of Insect Morphology and Embryology, 3, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wilson, E. O. (1971). The insect societies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 548 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Social Insect Research Group, School of Life SciencesArizona State University TempeUSA