Encyclopedia of Social Insects

Living Edition
| Editors: Christopher Starr

Swarm-Founding Wasps

  • Robert L. JeanneEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90306-4_123-1
Social vespids fall into two conspicuously dissimilar behavioral groups according to their mode of colony founding. The independent founders initiate new colonies by one or a few inseminated females without the aid of true workers. In contrast, s warm founders initiate colonies by means of a group comprising many workers and a smaller number of inseminated females (queens) (Fig. 1).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.
    Bourke, A. F. G. (1999). Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 12, 245–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jeanne, R. L. (1991). Polyethism. In K. G. Ross & R. W. Matthews (Eds.), The social biology of wasps (pp. 389–425). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jeanne, R. L. (1991). The swarm-founding Polistinae. In K. G. Ross & R. W. Matthews (Eds.), The social biology of wasps (pp. 191–231). Ithaca/New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jeanne, R. L. (2003). Social complexity in the Hymenoptera, with special attention to the wasps. In T. Kikuchi, N. Azuma, & S. Higashi (Eds.), Genes, behaviors and evolution of social insects (pp. 81–130). Sapporo: Japan Hokkaido University Press.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johnson, B. R. (2010). Task partitioning in honey bees: The roles of signals and cues in group-level coordination of action. Behavioral Ecology, 21, 1373–1379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lucas, E. R., & Keller, L. (2014). Ageing and somatic maintenance in social insects. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 5, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Donnell, S. (1998). Reproductive caste determination in eusocial wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Annual Review of Entomology, 43, 323–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pickett, K. M., & Carpenter, J. M. (2010). Simultaneous analysis and the origin of eusociality in the Vespidae (Insecta: Hymenoptera). Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny, 68, 3–33.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ratnieks, F. L. W., & Anderson, C. (1999). Task partitioning in insect societies. Insectes Sociaux, 46, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Seeley, T. D. (1995). The wisdom of the hive: the social physiology of honey bee colonies (p. xiv + 295). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    da Silva, M., Noll, F. B., & Carpenter, J. M. (2014). The usefulness of the sting apparatus in phylogenetic reconstructions in vespids, with emphasis on the Epiponini: More support for the single origin of eusociality in the Vespidae. Neotropical Entomology, 43, 134–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith, A. R., O’Donnell, S., & Jeanne, R. L. (2002). Evolution of swarm communication in eusocial wasps (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Journal of Insect Behavior, 15, 751–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Szathmáry, E., & Maynard Smith, J. (1995). The major transitions in evolution (p. xiv + 346). New York: W. H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Toth, A. L., Sumner, S., & Jeanne, R. L. (2016). Patterns of longevity across a sociality gradient in vespid wasps. Current Opinion in Insect Science, 16, 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wenzel, J. (1991). Evolution of nest architecture. In K. G. Ross & R. W. Matthews (Eds.), The social biology of wasps (pp. 480–519). Ithaca/New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wilson, E. O. (1990). Success and dominance in ecosystems: The case of the social insects (p. 104). Oldendorf/Luhe: Ecology Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA