The Heart-Brain Connection in Patients with Disorders of Consciousness

  • Francesca PistoiaEmail author
  • Simona Sacco
  • Marco Sarà
  • Antonio Carolei
Living reference work entry


Recently, there has been a growing emphasis on better understanding how the brain-heart axis works and in which way the brain may influence cardiac performances both in physiological and in pathological conditions. A new research field, named as neurocardiology, investigates the whole spectrum of cardiac syndromes, which arise as a result of a widespread or a strategic brain injury in the absence of a real ischemic heart disease. Disorders of consciousness, such as coma, vegetative state and minimally conscious state, have been recently reported to be associated with multiple medical comorbidities, also including cardiovascular manifestations like arrhythmias, arterial hypertension, and conditions of myocardial stunning. There is growing evidence that such clinical events are the consequence of an autonomic imbalance within the autonomic nervous system, with the sympathetic activation outweighing the parasympathetic one. Either a widespread anoxic brain injury or a vascular/traumatic damage in specific cortical areas, which usually slow down the activity of the sympathetic branch, may produce a wide pattern of cardiac manifestations ultimately interfering with the prognosis of patients. Investigating the cardiac behavior in patients with disorders of consciousness is mandatory in order to avoid further medical complications, prevent the secondary injury occurring in the minutes to months following the primitive brain damage, and improve survival and long-term outcomes. Moreover, the study of the brain-heart interface offers a window for a better understanding of the natural history of disorders of consciousness and the identification of chances for recovery. This is because the heart behavior, with its physiological fluctuations, may represent an indirect sign of the residual complexity of cortical-subcortical networks responsible for consciousness recovery.


Coma Vegetative state Unresponsive wakefulness syndrome Minimally conscious state Comorbidities Heart 


  1. 1.
    Pistoia F, Sacco S, Franceschini M, Sarà M, Pistarini C, Cazzulani B, Simonelli I, Pasqualetti P, Carolei A. Comorbidities: a key issue in patients with disorders of consciousness. J Neurotrauma. 2015;315(32):682–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Samuels MA. The brain-heart connection. Circulation. 2007;116(1):77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Plum F, Posner JB. The diagnosis of stupor and coma. Contemp Neurol Ser. 1972;10:1–286.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state: first of two parts. N Engl J Med. 1994;1994(330):1499–508.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    The Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state: second of two parts. N Engl J Med. 1994;330(22):1572–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, Zasler ND. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002;58:349–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalmar K, Giacino JT. The JFK coma recovery scale – revised. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005;15(3–4):454–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lombardi F, Gatta G, Sacco S, Muratori A, Carolei A. The Italian version of the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R). Funct Neurol. 2007;22(1):47–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Levy ER, McVeigh U, Ramsay AM. Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity (sympathetic storm) in a patient with permanent vegetative state. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(12):1355–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Meyfroidt G, Baguley IJ, Menon DK. Paroxysmal sympathetic hyperactivity: the storm after acute brain injury. Lancet Neurol. 2017;16(9):721–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Finsterer J, Wahbi K. CNS-disease affecting the heart: brain-heart disorders. J Neurol Sci. 2014;345(1–2):8–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tahsili-Fahadan P, Geocadin RG. Heart-brain axis: effects of neurologic injury on cardiovascular function. Circ Res. 2017;120(3):559–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murthy SB, Shah S, Venkatasubba Rao CP, Suarez JI, Bershad EM. Clinical characteristics of myocardial stunning in acute stroke. J Clin Neurosci. 2014;21(8):1279–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daniele O, Caravaglios G, Fierro B, Natalè E. Stroke and cardiac arrhythmias. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2002;11(1):28–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Woolf PD, Hamill RW, Lee LA, Cox C, McDonald JV. The predictive value of catecholamines in assessing outcome in traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg. 1987;66(6):875–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hamill RW, Woolf PD, McDonald JV, Lee LA, Kelly M. Catecholamines predict outcome in traumatic brain injury. Ann Neurol. 1987;21(5):438–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    El-Menyar A, Goyal A, Latifi R, Al-Thani H, Frishman W. Brain-heart interactions in traumatic brain injury. Cardiol Rev. 2017;25(6):279–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patel MB, McKenna JW, Alvarez JM, Sugiura A, Jenkins JM, Guillamondegui OD, Pandharipande PP. Decreasing adrenergic or sympathetic hyperactivity after severe traumatic brain injury using propranolol and clonidine (DASH after TBI study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012;13:177. Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gao L, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Ercole A. Early asymmetric cardio-cerebral causality and outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2017;34(19):2743–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gao L, Smielewski P, Czosnyka M, Ercole A. Cerebrovascular signal complexity six hours after intensive care unit admission correlates with outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2016;33(22):2011–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sarà M, Sebastiano F, Sacco S, Pistoia F, Onorati P, Albertini A, Carolei A. Heart rate non linear dynamics in patients with persistent vegetative state: a preliminary report. Brain Inj. 2008;22:33–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sarà M, Pistoia F. Complexity loss in physiological time series of patients in vegetative state: a pilot study. Nonlinear Dynamics Psychol Life Sci. 2010;14:1–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sarà M, Pistoia F. Defining consciousness: lessons from patients and modern techniques. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27:771–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Sarà M, Onorati P, Albertini G, Pistoia F. Consciousness: no matter what is, no matter where is – an edge shot approach. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2010;7:231–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Daley V. Emergent phenomena and complexity. In: Brooks R, Maes P, editors. Artificial life IV, Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1994.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Laureys S. The neural correlate of (un)awareness: lessons from the vegetative state. Trends Cogn Sci. 2005;9(12):556–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Riganello F, Larroque SK, Bahri MA, Heine L, Martial C, Carrière M, Charland-Verville V, Aubinet C, Vanhaudenhuyse A, Chatelle C, Laureys S, Di Perri C. A heartbeat away from consciousness: heart rate variability entropy can discriminate disorders of consciousness and is correlated with resting-state fMRI brain connectivity of the central autonomic network. Front Neurol. 2018;9:769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sarà M, Pistoia F, Pasqualetti P, Sebastiano F, Onorati P, Rossini PM. Functional isolation within the cerebral cortex in the vegetative state: a nonlinear method to predict clinical outcomes. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25(1):35–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Schiff ND. Recovery of consciousness after severe brain injury: the role of arousal regulation mechanisms and some speculation on the heart-brain interface. Cleve Clin J Med. 2010;77(Suppl 3):S27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Degan D, Ornello R, Tiseo C, Carolei A, Sacco S, Pistoia F. The role of inflammation in neurological disorders. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(14):1485–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francesca Pistoia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Simona Sacco
    • 1
  • Marco Sarà
    • 2
    • 3
  • Antonio Carolei
    • 1
  1. 1.Neurological Institute, Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical SciencesUniversity of L’AquilaL’AquilaItaly
  2. 2.Post-Coma Rehabilitative UnitSan Raffaele HospitalCassinoItaly
  3. 3.IRCCS San Raffaele PisanaRomeItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Roberto Bergamaschi
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto Neurologico Nazionale ‘C. Mondino’PaviaItaly

Personalised recommendations