Interprofessional Practice in Palliative Care
Interprofessional practice informed by and developed through interprofessional education is critical for working within modern healthcare contexts and particularly within healthcare teams. Palliative care is a complex area of healthcare delivery, and interprofessional practice is a way of working together learning from, with, and about other health professionals. This chapter explores the terminology used within the interprofessional working and learning contexts. The challenges, opportunities, and barriers to interprofessional practice are explored in relation to what they are and how they can be constructive instead of creating conflict. One model of interprofessional practice is discussed, and the stages health professionals need to work through are outlined. The importance of interprofessional teamwork and collaborative practice is recognized as being critical to develop in settings such as palliative care where the focus is on the patient and their family.
- Boon H, Verhoef M, O’Hara D, Findlay B. From parallel practice to integrative health care: a conceptual framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4(15) https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-4-15.
- CAIPE. About Us. https://www.caipe.org/about-us. Accessed 2002.
- Canadian Interprofessional Health Collaborative. A national interprofessional competency framework. 2010. Available from: http://www.cihc.ca/files/CIHC_IPCompetencies_Feb1210.pdf
- Clinton M, Scheiwe D. Management in the Australian healthcare industry. Sydney: Harper Educational; 1995.Google Scholar
- Coyle J, Higgs J, McAllister L, Whiteford G. What is an interprofessional health care team anyway? In: Kitto S, Chester J, Thistlethwaite J, Reeves S, editors. Sociology of interprofessional health care practice: critical reflections and concrete solutions. Hauppauge: Nova Science Publishers; 2011.Google Scholar
- Dawson JF, Yan X, West MA. Positive and negative effects of team working in healthcare: real and pseudo-teams and their impact on safety. Birmingham: Aston University; 2007.Google Scholar
- Fulford KWM. Moral theory and medical practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1989.Google Scholar
- Grossman M, Hooton M. The significance of the relationship between discipline and its practice. J Adv Nurs. 1993;18:866–72. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1993.18060866.x/pdf.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hammick M, Freeth D, Copperman J, Goodsman D. Being interprofessional. Cambridge: Polity; 2009.Google Scholar
- Johnson DW, Johnson FP. Group dynamics. In: Johnson DW, Johnson FP, editors. Joining together: group theory and group skills. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson International; 2006.Google Scholar
- Jones EM. Shaping nursing praxis. MEd Admin [thesis]. Palmerston North, Massey University; 1993.Google Scholar
- Jones EM. Shaping team practice in the context of health reforms; opportunities, tensions, benefits. Adelaide: Flinders University; 2000.Google Scholar
- Jones EM, Jamieson I, Anderson L. Perioperative practice in the context of client-centred care. In: Orchard C, Bainbridge L, editors. Interprofessional client-centred collaborative practice. New York: Nova Science; 2015. p. 37–50.Google Scholar
- Katzenbach JR, Smith DK. The wisdom of teams: creating the high-performance organization. Boston: Harvard Business School Press; 1993.Google Scholar
- Lencioni P. The five dysfunctions of a team. Hoboken: Wiley; 2002.Google Scholar
- Manion J, Lorimer W, Leander W. Team based health care organisations: blueprint for success. New York: Aspen Publishers; 1996.Google Scholar
- NHS Institution for Innovation and Improvement (2010). Available from: https://www.hiirc.org.nz/page/18016/the-handbook-of-quality-and-service-improvement/.
- Oishi A, Murtagh FEM. The challenges of uncertainty and interprofessional collaboration in palliative care for non-cancer patients in the community: a systematic review of views from patients, carers and health-care professionals. Palliat Med. 2014;28(9):1081–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216314531999.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Shaw RB. Mental health treatment teams. In: Hackman RJ, editor. Groups that work (and those that don’t): creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey Boss; 1990. p. 330–46.Google Scholar
- Shortell S, Kaluzny A. Health care management: organisation design and behaviour. 3rd ed. New York: Delmar Publishers; 1994.Google Scholar
- Soothill K, Mackay L, Webb C. Interprofessional relations in health care. London: Edward Arnold; 1995.Google Scholar
- Strasen L. The image of professional nursing. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott Co; 1992.Google Scholar
- Thistlethwaite JE. Engaging health professionals in continuing interprofessional development. In: Orchard C, Bainbridge L, editors. Interprofessional client-centred collaborative practice. New York: Nova Publishers; 2015. p. 83–9.Google Scholar
- Thistlethwaite JE, Hawksworth W. Handling ethical dilemmas in multidisciplinary teams: an interprofessional values-based approach. In: Sadler JZ, Fulford KWM, Van Staden CW, editors. The Oxford handbook of psychiatric ethics, vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. p. 1328–45. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198732372.013.41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Walby S, Greenwall J, Mackay J, Soothill K. Medicine and nursing: professions in a changing health service. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.Google Scholar
- West M, Slater J. The effectiveness of teamworking in primary health care. London: HEA Publishing; 1996.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. Global consultation: the contribution to primary health care and the global health agenda. Geneva: WHO; 2009.Google Scholar
- World Health Organization. Framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.Google Scholar
- Zwarenstein M, Goldman J, Reeves S. Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD000072.Google Scholar