Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education

Living Edition
| Editors: Steve Lerman

Instrumentation in Mathematics Education

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77487-9_80-3

Introduction

In order to define instrumentation in the context of mathematics education, it is necessary to define instruments: at this stage of this entry, we do not differentiate between instruments and artifacts, i.e., regard them as things that are created and used by humans to help, assist, support, enlarge, empower their activity. Instrumentation is the action to give someone an instrument, or the action by which someone acquires an instrument, in order to perform a given activity. The notion of instrumentation is part of a network of concepts; we will focus here on the main dialectical relationships between them.

Instrumentation and Instruction

Contrary to the common perception that mathematics is a pure mental activity, the importance of tools in mathematical activity has been largely acknowledged: “many of the actions of doing mathematics involve selecting, using and creating tools.” (Monaghan et al. 2016, p. 4). What is true in general is all the more true for these...

Keywords

Appropriation Affordances Artifact Digital resources Design process Instrument Instrumental approach to didactics Instrumental genesis Instrumental orchestration Instrumentalization Instrumentation Orchestration Resources System of instruments 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Ghislaine Gueudet and Birgit Pepin for their reading of the first version of this article.

References

  1. Artigue M (2002) Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: the genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. Int J Comput Math Learn 7(3):245–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bacon F (1620/1858) Novum Organum. In: Spedding J, Ellis RL, Heath DD (eds) The collected works of Francis Bacon. Longmans, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Balacheff N (1994) Didactique et intelligence artificielle. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques 14(1/2):9–42Google Scholar
  4. Drijvers P, Doorman M, Boon P, Reed H, Gravemeijer K (2010) The teacher and the tool: instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educ Stud Math 75(2):213–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engeström Y, Miettinen R, Punamäki RL (1999) Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibson JJ (1979) The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt (HMH), BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. Gueudet G, Trouche L (2009) Towards new documentation systems for mathematics teachers? Educ Stud Math 71(3):199–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guin D, Trouche L (1999) The complex process of converting tools into mathematical instruments. The case of calculators. Int J Comput Math Learn 3(3):195–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guin D, Ruthven, Trouche L (eds) (2005) The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Lagrange J-B, Artigue M, Laborde C, Trouche L (2003) Technology and mathematics education: a multidimensional study of the evolution of research and innovation. In: Bishop AJ, Clements MA, Keitel C, Kilpatrick J, Leung FKS (eds) Second international handbook of mathematics education. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 239–271Google Scholar
  11. Maschietto M, Trouche L (2010) Mathematics learning and tools from theoretical, historical and practical points of view: the productive notion of mathematics laboratories. ZDM Int J Math Educ 42(1):33–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Monaghan J, Trouche L, Borwein J (2016) Tools and mathematics: instruments for learning. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Noss R, Hoyles C (eds) (1996) Windows on mathematical meanings – learning cultures and computers. Kluwer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  14. Proust C (2012) Masters’ writings and students’s writings: school material in Mesopotamia. In: Gueudet G, Pepin B, Trouche L (eds) From text to ‘lived’ resources. Mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development. Springer, New York, pp 161–179Google Scholar
  15. Salaün J-M (2012) Vu, lu, su, les architectes de l’information face à l’oligopole du web. La découverte, ParisGoogle Scholar
  16. Trouche L (2004) Managing the complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: guiding students’ command process through instrumental orchestrations. Int J Comput Math Learn 9:281–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Trouche L (2005) An instrumental approach to mathematics learning in symbolic calculators environments. In: Guin D, Ruthven K, Trouche L (eds) The didactical challenge of symbolic calculators: turning a computational device into a mathematical instrument. Springer, New York, pp 137–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Trouche L, Drijvers P (2010) Handheld technology for mathematics education, flashback to the future. ZDM Int J Math Educ 42(7):667–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vergnaud G (1996) The theory of conceptual fields. In: Steffe LP, Nesher P, Cobb P, Goldin GA, Greer B (eds) Theories of mathematical learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Ass, Mahwah, pp 219–239Google Scholar
  20. Verillon P, Rabardel P (1995) Cognition and artifact: a contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrument activity. Eur J Psychol Educ 9(3):77–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vygotsky LS (1981) The instrumental method in psychology. In: Wertsch JW (ed) The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. M.E. Sharpe, ArmonkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.French Institute of EducationEcole Normale Supérieure de LyonLyonFrance

Section editors and affiliations

  • Bharath Sriraman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Mathematical SciencesThe University of MontanaMissoulaUSA